Vigolo Suelen, Zuckermann Joice, Bittencourt Rosane Isabel, Silla Lúcia, Pilger Diogo André
Department of Analyzes, Faculty of Pharmacy, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.
Pharmacy Service, Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.
Hematol Oncol Stem Cell Ther. 2017 Sep;10(3):135-142. doi: 10.1016/j.hemonc.2017.05.027. Epub 2017 Jun 15.
OBJECTIVE/BACKGROUND: Chemotherapy followed by autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) remains the standard treatment for multiple myeloma (MM). Thalidomide or bortezomib may be combined with cyclophosphamide and dexamethasone, in what are known as the CTD and VCD protocols, respectively. The objective of this study was to evaluate the clinical characteristics and response rates obtained with CTD and VCD, observing whether the inclusion of bortezomib to treat MM patients in Brazil increases therapeutic efficiency.
Forty-three MM patients treated with induction protocols CTD and VCD between January 2010 and March 2015 were included. The parameters analyzed were staging, frequency of comorbidities prior to treatment, response rates obtained at each induction cycle, progression-free survival, and overall survival of patients.
Very good partial response and complete response obtained with the VCD protocol were superior, compared with the CTD treatment. The presence of comorbidities was similar in the two groups, except kidney failure, which prevailed in the VCD group. Also, 78.3% and 48.3% of patients treated with the VCD and CTD protocols underwent autologous HSCT, respectively. In patients given the VCD protocol, 45.5% had complete response before autologous HSCT. Among those given CTD, this number was only 7.1% (p=0.023). Disease progression after autologous HSCT did not differ between the two groups.
VCD afforded better responses than the CTD protocol, and improved patient condition before autologous HSCT. However, more studies are necessary including more patients and addressing various clinical conditions, besides the analysis of cost-effectiveness of these treatments.
目的/背景:化疗后进行自体造血干细胞移植(HSCT)仍是多发性骨髓瘤(MM)的标准治疗方法。沙利度胺或硼替佐米可分别与环磷酰胺和地塞米松联合使用,即分别称为CTD和VCD方案。本研究的目的是评估CTD和VCD方案的临床特征及缓解率,观察在巴西将硼替佐米纳入MM患者治疗是否能提高治疗效果。
纳入2010年1月至2015年3月期间接受诱导方案CTD和VCD治疗的43例MM患者。分析的参数包括分期、治疗前合并症的发生率、每个诱导周期的缓解率、无进展生存期和患者的总生存期。
与CTD治疗相比,VCD方案获得的非常好的部分缓解和完全缓解更优。两组合并症的情况相似,但肾衰竭在VCD组更为常见。此外,接受VCD和CTD方案治疗的患者分别有78.3%和48.3%接受了自体HSCT。接受VCD方案的患者中,45.5%在自体HSCT前获得了完全缓解。在接受CTD方案的患者中,这一数字仅为7.1%(p = 0.023)。两组自体HSCT后的疾病进展情况无差异。
VCD方案比CTD方案疗效更好,且在自体HSCT前改善了患者状况。然而,除了分析这些治疗的成本效益外,还需要进行更多研究,纳入更多患者并涉及各种临床情况。