Diwanji Tejan P, Molitoris Jason K, Chhabra Arpit M, Snider James W, Bentzen Soren M, Tkaczuk Katherine H, Rosenblatt Paula Y, Kesmodel Susan B, Bellavance Emily C, Cohen Randi J, Cheston Sally B, Nichols Elizabeth M, Feigenberg Steven J
Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Maryland Medical Center, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2017 Sep;165(2):445-453. doi: 10.1007/s10549-017-4345-y. Epub 2017 Jun 21.
Results from four major hypofractionated whole-breast radiotherapy (HF-WBRT) trials have demonstrated equivalence in select patients with early-stage breast cancer when compared with conventionally fractionated WBRT (CF-WBRT). Because relatively little data were available on patients receiving neoadjuvant or adjuvant chemotherapy, consensus guidelines published in 2011 did not endorse the use of HF-WBRT in this population. Our goal is to evaluate trends in utilization of HF-WBRT in patients receiving chemotherapy.
We retrospectively analyzed data from 2004 to 2013 in the National Cancer DataBase on breast cancer patients treated with HF-WBRT who met the clinical criteria proposed by consensus guidelines (i.e., age >0 years, T1-2N0, and breast-conserving surgery), regardless of receipt of chemotherapy. We employed logistic regression to delineate and compare clinical and demographic factors associated with utilization of HF-WBRT and CF-WBRT.
A total of 56,836 women were treated with chemotherapy and WBRT (without regional nodal irradiation) from 2004 to 2013; 9.0% (n = 5093) were treated with HF-WBRT. Utilization of HF-WBRT increased from 4.6% in 2004 to 18.2% in 2013 (odds ratio [OR] 1.21/year; P < 0.001). Among patients receiving chemotherapy, factors most dramatically associated with increased odds of receiving HF-WBRT on multivariate analysis were academic facilities (OR 2.07; P < 0.001), age >80 (OR 2.58; P < 0.001), west region (OR 1.91; P < 0.001), and distance >50 miles from cancer reporting facility (OR 1.43; P < 0.001). Factors associated with decreased odds of receiving HF-WBRT included white race, income <$48,000, lack of private insurance, T2 versus T1, and higher grade (all P < 0.02).
Despite the absence of consensus guideline recommendations, the use of HF-WBRT in patients receiving chemotherapy has increased fourfold (absolute = 13.6%) over the last decade. Increased utilization of HF-WBRT should result in institutional reports verifying its safety and efficacy.
四项主要的大分割全乳放疗(HF-WBRT)试验结果表明,与传统分割全乳放疗(CF-WBRT)相比,部分早期乳腺癌患者疗效相当。由于接受新辅助或辅助化疗患者的数据相对较少,2011年发布的共识指南未认可在该人群中使用HF-WBRT。我们的目标是评估接受化疗患者中HF-WBRT的使用趋势。
我们回顾性分析了2004年至2013年国家癌症数据库中接受HF-WBRT治疗且符合共识指南提出的临床标准(即年龄>0岁、T1-2N0且保乳手术)的乳腺癌患者数据,无论其是否接受化疗。我们采用逻辑回归来描述和比较与HF-WBRT和CF-WBRT使用相关的临床和人口统计学因素。
2004年至2013年共有56,836名女性接受了化疗和全乳放疗(无区域淋巴结照射);9.0%(n = 5093)接受了HF-WBRT。HF-WBRT的使用率从2004年的4.6%增至2013年的18.2%(比值比[OR]为1.21/年;P < 0.001)。在接受化疗的患者中,多因素分析显示与接受HF-WBRT几率增加最显著相关的因素为学术机构(OR 2.07;P < 0.001)、年龄>80岁(OR 2.58;P < 0.001)、西部地区(OR 1.91;P < 0.001)以及距离癌症报告机构>50英里(OR 1.43;P < 0.001)。与接受HF-WBRT几率降低相关的因素包括白人种族、收入<$48,000、缺乏私人保险、T2期与T1期相比以及更高分级(所有P < 0.02)。
尽管缺乏共识指南推荐,但在过去十年中,接受化疗患者中HF-WBRT的使用增加了四倍(绝对值=13.6%)。HF-WBRT使用的增加应促使机构报告核实其安全性和有效性。