Hussein Ahmed, Das Moloy, Chaturvedi Vivek, Asfour Issa Khalil, Daryanani Niji, Morgan Maureen, Ronayne Christina, Shaw Matthew, Snowdon Richard, Gupta Dhiraj
Institute of Cardiovascular Medicine and Science, Department of Cardiology, Liverpool Heart and Chest Hospital, Liverpool, UK.
Department of Cardiology, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2017 Sep;28(9):1037-1047. doi: 10.1111/jce.13281. Epub 2017 Jul 26.
Late recovery of ablated tissue leading to reconnection of pulmonary veins remains common following radiofrequency catheter ablation for AF. Ablation Index (AI), a novel ablation quality marker, incorporates contact force (CF), time, and power in a weighted formula. We hypothesized that prospective use of our previously published derived AI targets would result in better outcomes when compared to CF-guided ablation.
Eighty-nine consecutive drug-refractory AF patients (49% paroxysmal) underwent AI-guided ablation (AI-group). AI targets were 550 for anterior/roof and 400 for posterior/inferior left atrial segments. Procedural and clinical outcomes of these patients were compared to 89 propensity-matched controls who underwent CF-guided ablation (CF-group). All 178 procedures were otherwise similar, and both groups were followed-up for 12 months. The last 25 patients from each group underwent analysis of all VisiTags™ for ablation duration, CF, Force-Time Integral, and impedance drop.
First-pass pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) was more frequent in AI-group than in CF-group (173 [97%] vs. 149 [84%] circles, P < 0.001), and acute PV reconnection was lower (11 [6%] vs. 24 [13%] circles, P = 0.02). Mean PVI ablation time was similar (AI-group: 42 ± 9 vs. CF-group: 45 ± 14 minutes, P = 0.14). Median impedance drop for AI-group was significantly higher than in CF-group (13.7 [9-19] Ω vs. 8.8 [5.2-13] Ω, P < 0.001). Two major complications occurred in CF-group and none in AI-group. Atrial tachyarrhythmia recurrence was significantly lower in AI-group (15 of 89 [17%]) than in CF-group (33 of 89 [37%], P = 0.002).
AI-guided ablation is associated with significant improvements in the incidence of acute PV reconnection and atrial tachyarrhythmia recurrence rate compared to CF-guided ablation, potentially due to creation of better quality lesions as suggested by greater impedance drop.
在房颤的射频导管消融术后,消融组织的延迟恢复导致肺静脉重新连接的情况仍然很常见。消融指数(AI)是一种新型的消融质量标志物,在一个加权公式中纳入了接触力(CF)、时间和功率。我们假设,与CF引导的消融相比,前瞻性地使用我们之前发表的推导AI目标将产生更好的结果。
89例连续的药物难治性房颤患者(49%为阵发性)接受了AI引导的消融(AI组)。AI目标为左心房前壁/顶部550,后壁/下部400。将这些患者的手术和临床结果与89例倾向匹配的接受CF引导消融的对照组(CF组)进行比较。所有178例手术在其他方面相似,两组均随访12个月。每组的最后25例患者对所有VisiTags™进行了消融持续时间、CF、力-时间积分和阻抗下降的分析。
AI组首次肺静脉隔离(PVI)比CF组更频繁(173个[97%]对149个[84%]环,P<0.001),急性肺静脉重新连接更低(11个[6%]对24个[13%]环,P=0.02)。平均PVI消融时间相似(AI组:42±9分钟对CF组:45±14分钟,P=0.14)。AI组的中位阻抗下降显著高于CF组(13.7[9-19]Ω对8.8[5.2-13]Ω,P<0.001)。CF组发生了2例主要并发症,AI组无。AI组房性快速心律失常复发率显著低于CF组(89例中的15例[17%]对89例中的33例[37%],P=0.002)。
与CF引导的消融相比,AI引导的消融与急性肺静脉重新连接的发生率和房性快速心律失常复发率的显著改善相关,这可能是由于更大的阻抗下降表明产生了质量更好的病变。