Begley Elin B, Ware Jamie M, Hexem Sarah A, Rapposelli Karina, Thompson Kelly, Penn Matthew S, Aquino Gustavo A
Elin B. Begley is with the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Atlanta, GA. Jamie M. Ware is with S. R. Wojdak & Associates, Philadelphia, PA. Sarah A. Hexem and Kelly Thompson are with the National Nurse-Led Care Consortium, Philadelphia. Karina Rapposelli is with the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Office of Public Health Preparedness and Response, Atlanta. Matthew S. Penn is with the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Office for State, Tribal, Local and Territorial Support, Atlanta. Gustavo A. Aquino is with the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for HIV, Viral Hepatitis, STD and TB Prevention, Atlanta.
Am J Public Health. 2017 Aug;107(8):1272-1276. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2017.303862. Epub 2017 Jun 22.
Despite benefits to sharing data among public health programs, confidentiality laws are often presumed to obstruct collaboration or data sharing. We present an overview of the use and release of confidential, personally identifiable information as consistent with public health interests and identify opportunities to align data-sharing procedures with use and release provisions in state laws to improve program outcomes. In August 2013, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention staff and legal researchers from the National Nurse-Led Care Consortium conducted a review of state laws regulating state and local health departments in 50 states and the District of Columbia. Nearly all states and the District of Columbia employ provisions for the general use and release of personally identifiable information without patient consent; disease-specific use or release provisions vary by state. Absence of law regarding use and release provisions was noted. Health departments should assess existing state laws to determine whether the use or release of personally identifiable information is permitted. Absence of direction should not prevent data sharing but prompt an analysis of existing provisions in confidentiality laws.
尽管公共卫生项目之间共享数据有诸多益处,但保密法常常被认为会阻碍合作或数据共享。我们概述了与公共卫生利益相一致的机密、个人身份可识别信息的使用和披露情况,并确定了使数据共享程序与州法律中的使用和披露规定保持一致以改善项目成果的机会。2013年8月,疾病控制与预防中心的工作人员以及来自全国护士主导护理联盟的法律研究人员对50个州和哥伦比亚特区规范州和地方卫生部门的州法律进行了审查。几乎所有州和哥伦比亚特区都规定在未经患者同意的情况下可对个人身份可识别信息进行一般使用和披露;针对特定疾病的使用或披露规定因州而异。注意到存在关于使用和披露规定的法律缺失情况。卫生部门应评估现有的州法律,以确定是否允许使用或披露个人身份可识别信息。缺乏相关指导不应妨碍数据共享,而应促使对保密法中的现有规定进行分析。