Reis Ana Paula, Rocha Ana, Lebre Andrea, Ramos Umbelina, Cunha Ana
a Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology , Centro Hospitalar do Porto , Porto , Portugal.
b Department of Pathological Anatomy , Centro Hospitalar do Porto , Porto , Portugal.
J Obstet Gynaecol. 2017 Oct;37(7):835-839. doi: 10.1080/01443615.2017.1323854. Epub 2017 Jun 22.
This was a retrospective cohort analysis of stillbirths that occurred from January 2004 to December 2013 in our institution. We compared Tulip and Wigglesworth classification systems on a cohort of stillbirths and analysed the main differences between these two classifications. In this period, there were 112 stillbirths of a total of 31,758 births (stillbirth rate of 3.5 per 1000 births). There were 99 antepartum deaths and 13 intrapartum deaths. Foetal autopsy was performed in 99 cases and placental histopathological examination in all of the cases. The Wigglesworth found 'unknown' causes in 47 cases and the Tulip classification allocated 33 of these. Fourteen cases remained in the group of 'unknown' causes. Therefore, the Wigglesworth classification of stillbirths results in a higher proportion of unexplained stillbirths. We suggest that the traditional Wigglesworth classification should be substituted by a classification that manages the available information.
这是一项对2004年1月至2013年12月在我们机构发生的死产进行的回顾性队列分析。我们在一组死产病例中比较了郁金香分类系统和威格尔斯沃思分类系统,并分析了这两种分类之间的主要差异。在此期间,在总共31758例出生中,有112例死产(死产率为每1000例出生3.5例)。有99例产前死亡和13例产时死亡。对99例进行了胎儿尸检,所有病例均进行了胎盘组织病理学检查。威格尔斯沃思分类法在47例中发现“原因不明”,郁金香分类法将其中33例归为此类。14例仍属于“原因不明”组。因此,威格尔斯沃思死产分类法导致不明原因死产的比例更高。我们建议用一种能处理现有信息的分类法取代传统的威格尔斯沃思分类法。