• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

棕榈酸帕利哌酮与口服非典型抗精神病药物对合并物质滥用的退伍军人精神分裂症患者医疗资源利用及成本的影响。

Impact of Paliperidone Palmitate Versus Oral Atypical Antipsychotics on Health Care Resource Use and Costs in Veterans With Schizophrenia and Comorbid Substance Abuse.

作者信息

Lefebvre Patrick, Muser Erik, Joshi Kruti, DerSarkissian Maral, Bhak Rachel H, Duh Mei Sheng, Shiner Brian, Young-Xu Yinong

机构信息

Analysis Group, Inc, Boston, Massachussetts.

Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC, Titusville, New Jersey.

出版信息

Clin Ther. 2017 Jul;39(7):1380-1395.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2017.05.356. Epub 2017 Jun 20.

DOI:10.1016/j.clinthera.2017.05.356
PMID:28641996
Abstract

PURPOSE

Almost half of all patients diagnosed with schizophrenia have a history of substance abuse (SA). However, data on treatment of schizophrenia with paliperidone palmitate (PP) among patients with comorbid SA are limited. The objective of this study was to compare all-cause and SA-related health care resource utilization and costs in veterans with schizophrenia and co-occurring SA who were treated with PP versus oral atypical antipsychotics (OAAs).

METHODS

Veterans Health Administration electronic health record data were used to conduct a retrospective longitudinal study in veterans with schizophrenia who initiated PP or OAA between January 1, 2010 and June 30, 2016, had ≥12 months of enrollment before treatment initiation (baseline), were diagnosed with SA, and had ≥1 Global Assessment of Functioning score during baseline. Differences in baseline characteristics were adjusted for using inverse probability of treatment weighting. Adjusted cost differences and incidence rate ratios (IRR) for the association between PP versus OAA and all-cause and SA-related health care costs and health care resource utilization in the 12 months after treatment initiation were estimated with corresponding 95% CIs using weighted linear and Poisson regression models, respectively.

FINDINGS

Of 6872 veterans in the study, 1684 (25%) and 5188 (75%) were treated with PP and OAA, respectively. After adjustment, PP was associated with fewer all-cause inpatient (IRR = 0.88; 95% CI, 0.85 to 0.90), mental health-related inpatient (IRR = 0.88; 95% CI, 0.85 to 0.91), and long-term care stays (IRR = 0.53; 95% CI, 0.44 to 0.64), but more frequent mental health intensive case management visits (IRR = 1.51; 95% CI, 1.49 to 1.53) compared with OAA (all P < 0.001). Similarly, PP was associated with significantly lower rates of SA-related inpatient stays (IRR = 0.80; 95% CI, 0.77 to 0.83), mental health stays (IRR = 0.85; 95% CI, 0.82 to 0.88), long-term care stays (IRR = 0.22; 95% CI, 0.15 to 0.32), and outpatient visits (IRR = 0.78; 95% CI, 0.77 to 0.79) than OAA (all P < 0.001). Relative to OAA, patients treated with PP also had lower mean annual all-cause (cost difference = -$10,473; 95% CI, -$17,827 to -$3491) and SA-related (cost difference = -$8457; 95% CI, -$12,710 to -$3638) medical costs (all P < 0.001).

IMPLICATIONS

PP was associated with significant total medical cost savings resulting from fewer hospitalizations and lower rates of SA-related health care resource utilization compared with OAA in patients with schizophrenia and comorbid SA. Thus, PP appears to be a valuable treatment option for patients in this subpopulation.

摘要

目的

在所有被诊断为精神分裂症的患者中,近一半有药物滥用(SA)史。然而,关于合并SA的患者使用棕榈酸帕利哌酮(PP)治疗精神分裂症的数据有限。本研究的目的是比较接受PP治疗与口服非典型抗精神病药物(OAA)治疗的合并SA的精神分裂症退伍军人的全因和SA相关的医疗保健资源利用及成本。

方法

利用退伍军人健康管理局的电子健康记录数据,对2010年1月1日至2016年6月30日期间开始使用PP或OAA、在治疗开始前有≥12个月的登记时间(基线)、被诊断为SA且在基线时有≥1次全球功能评估得分的精神分裂症退伍军人进行回顾性纵向研究。使用治疗权重的逆概率对基线特征的差异进行调整。使用加权线性回归模型和泊松回归模型分别估计PP与OAA之间关联的调整成本差异和发病率比(IRR),以及治疗开始后12个月内全因和SA相关的医疗保健成本及医疗保健资源利用情况,并给出相应的95%置信区间。

结果

在该研究的6872名退伍军人中,分别有1684名(25%)和5188名(75%)接受了PP和OAA治疗。调整后,与OAA相比,PP与更少的全因住院(IRR = 0.88;95% CI,0.85至0.90)、心理健康相关住院(IRR = 0.88;95% CI,0.85至0.91)和长期护理住院(IRR = 0.53;95% CI,0.44至0.64)相关,但心理健康强化个案管理访视更频繁(IRR = 1.51;95% CI,1.49至1.53)(所有P < 0.001)。同样,与OAA相比,PP与SA相关住院率(IRR = 0.80;95% CI,0.77至0.83)、心理健康住院率(IRR = 0.85;95% CI,0.82至0.88)、长期护理住院率(IRR = 0.22;95% CI,0.15至0.32)和门诊就诊率(IRR = 0.78;95% CI,0.77至0.79)显著降低相关(所有P < 0.001)。相对于OAA,接受PP治疗的患者的年均全因(成本差异 = -$10,473;95% CI,-$17,827至-$3491)和SA相关(成本差异 = -$8457;95% CI,-$12,710至-$3638)医疗成本也更低(所有P < 0.001)。

启示

与OAA相比,PP与显著的医疗总成本节省相关,这是由于精神分裂症合并SA的患者住院次数减少以及SA相关医疗保健资源利用率降低。因此,PP似乎是该亚组患者的一种有价值的治疗选择。

相似文献

1
Impact of Paliperidone Palmitate Versus Oral Atypical Antipsychotics on Health Care Resource Use and Costs in Veterans With Schizophrenia and Comorbid Substance Abuse.棕榈酸帕利哌酮与口服非典型抗精神病药物对合并物质滥用的退伍军人精神分裂症患者医疗资源利用及成本的影响。
Clin Ther. 2017 Jul;39(7):1380-1395.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2017.05.356. Epub 2017 Jun 20.
2
Impact of Paliperidone Palmitate Versus Oral Atypical Antipsychotics on Health Care Resource Use and Costs in Veterans with Schizophrenia.棕榈酸帕利哌酮与口服非典型抗精神病药治疗精神分裂症退伍军人的医疗资源利用和成本的影响。
J Clin Psychiatry. 2016 Oct;77(10):e1332-e1341. doi: 10.4088/JCP.16m10745.
3
Treatment Patterns, Health Care Resource Utilization, and Spending in Medicaid Beneficiaries Initiating Second-generation Long-acting Injectable Agents Versus Oral Atypical Antipsychotics.启动第二代长效注射剂与口服非典型抗精神病药物的医疗补助受益人的治疗模式、医疗资源利用及支出情况
Clin Ther. 2017 Oct;39(10):1972-1985.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2017.08.008. Epub 2017 Sep 15.
4
Comparison of Medicaid spending in schizoaffective patients treated with once monthly paliperidone palmitate or oral atypical antipsychotics.每月一次棕榈酸帕利哌酮或口服非典型抗精神病药物治疗的分裂情感性障碍患者的医疗补助支出比较
Curr Med Res Opin. 2016;32(4):759-69. doi: 10.1185/03007995.2016.1140634. Epub 2016 Feb 2.
5
Adherence, healthcare resource utilization and Medicaid spending associated with once-monthly paliperidone palmitate versus oral atypical antipsychotic treatment among adults recently diagnosed with schizophrenia.近期诊断为精神分裂症的成年人中,每月一次棕榈酸帕利哌酮与口服非典型抗精神病药物治疗的依从性、医疗资源利用及医疗补助支出情况
BMC Psychiatry. 2017 Jun 2;17(1):207. doi: 10.1186/s12888-017-1358-3.
6
A comparison of treatment patterns, healthcare resource utilization, and costs among young adult Medicaid beneficiaries with schizophrenia treated with paliperidone palmitate or oral atypical antipsychotics in the US.美国使用棕榈酸帕利哌酮或口服非典型抗精神病药物治疗的患有精神分裂症的年轻成年医疗补助受益人的治疗模式、医疗资源利用及成本比较
J Med Econ. 2018 Dec;21(12):1221-1229. doi: 10.1080/13696998.2018.1527608. Epub 2018 Oct 9.
7
Healthcare utilization and costs of Veterans Health Administration patients with schizophrenia treated with paliperidone palmitate long-acting injection or oral atypical antipsychotics.接受棕榈酸帕利哌酮长效注射或口服非典型抗精神病药物治疗的退伍军人管理局精神分裂症患者的医疗利用和成本。
J Med Econ. 2015 May;18(5):357-65. doi: 10.3111/13696998.2014.1001514. Epub 2015 Jan 19.
8
Health Care Cost in Patients With Schizophrenia Treated With Brexpiprazole Versus Other Oral Atypical Antipsychotic Therapy.接受布瑞哌唑与其他口服非典型抗精神病药物治疗的精神分裂症患者的医疗保健费用。
Clin Ther. 2020 Jan;42(1):77-93. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2019.11.009. Epub 2020 Jan 10.
9
Real-world adherence and economic outcomes associated with paliperidone palmitate versus oral atypical antipsychotics in schizophrenia patients with substance-related disorders using Medicaid benefits.使用医疗补助福利的合并物质相关障碍的精神分裂症患者中,棕榈酸帕利哌酮与口服非典型抗精神病药物相比的真实世界依从性和经济结果。
J Comp Eff Res. 2018 Feb;7(2):121-133. doi: 10.2217/cer-2017-0043. Epub 2017 Aug 15.
10
Healthcare resource utilization of second-generation long-acting injectable antipsychotics in schizophrenia: risperidone versus paliperidone palmitate.第二代长效注射用抗精神病药物在精神分裂症中的医疗资源利用:利培酮与棕榈酸帕利哌酮对比
Curr Med Res Opin. 2016 Nov;32(11):1873-1881. doi: 10.1080/03007995.2016.1219706. Epub 2016 Aug 22.

引用本文的文献

1
Health economics study of paliperidone palmitate in the treatment of schizophrenia: a 12-month cohort study.棕榈酸帕利哌酮治疗精神分裂症的卫生经济学研究:一项为期12个月的队列研究。
BMC Psychiatry. 2024 Jun 12;24(1):439. doi: 10.1186/s12888-024-05874-1.
2
A systematic review of the real-world effectiveness and economic and humanistic outcomes of selected oral antipsychotics among patients with schizophrenia in the United States: Updating the evidence and gaps.一项在美国精神分裂症患者中,对选定的口服抗精神病药物的真实世界疗效及经济和人文结局的系统评价:更新证据和差距。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2024 Feb 3;30(2):183-199. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2024.30.2.183.
3
Efficacy and Safety of Paliperidone Palmitate 6-Month versus Paliperidone Palmitate 3-Month Long-Acting Injectable in European Patients with Schizophrenia: A Post Hoc Analysis of a Global Phase-3 Double-Blind Randomized Non-Inferiority Study.
棕榈酸帕利哌酮6个月长效注射剂与棕榈酸帕利哌酮3个月长效注射剂治疗欧洲精神分裂症患者的疗效和安全性:一项全球3期双盲随机非劣效性研究的事后分析
Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2023 Apr 13;19:895-906. doi: 10.2147/NDT.S400342. eCollection 2023.
4
Effect of long-acting injectable antipsychotics on hospitalizations and global functioning in schizophrenia: a naturalistic mirror-image study.长效注射用抗精神病药物对精神分裂症住院率及整体功能的影响:一项自然主义镜像研究
Ther Adv Psychopharmacol. 2022 Oct 8;12:20451253221122526. doi: 10.1177/20451253221122526. eCollection 2022.
5
Patient Journey of Veterans with Schizophrenia: An Analysis of Treatment Patterns, Healthcare Resource Utilization and Costs.退伍军人精神分裂症患者的就医历程:治疗模式、医疗资源利用和成本分析。
Adv Ther. 2022 Mar;39(3):1199-1214. doi: 10.1007/s12325-021-01997-z. Epub 2022 Jan 7.
6
Real-World Evidence of the Clinical and Economic Impact of Long-Acting Injectable Versus Oral Antipsychotics Among Patients with Schizophrenia in the United States: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.美国精神分裂症患者长效注射抗精神病药与口服抗精神病药的临床和经济影响的真实世界证据:系统评价和荟萃分析。
CNS Drugs. 2021 May;35(5):469-481. doi: 10.1007/s40263-021-00815-y. Epub 2021 Apr 28.
7
The Impact of Once-Monthly Paliperidone Palmitate on Healthcare Utilization Among Patients With Schizophrenia Treated in an Integrated Healthcare System: A Retrospective Mirror-Image Study.每月注射一次棕榈酸帕利哌酮对综合医疗系统中治疗的精神分裂症患者医疗资源利用的影响:一项回顾性镜像研究。
Adv Ther. 2021 Apr;38(4):1958-1974. doi: 10.1007/s12325-021-01626-9. Epub 2021 Mar 11.
8
Healthcare Resource Utilization and Costs Among Patients With Schizophrenia Switching From Oral Risperidone/Paliperidone to Once-Monthly Paliperidone Palmitate: A Veterans Health Administration Claims Analysis.从口服利培酮/帕利哌酮转换为每月一次棕榈酸帕利哌酮的精神分裂症患者的医疗资源利用和成本:退伍军人健康管理局索赔分析
Curr Ther Res Clin Exp. 2020 Apr 19;92:100587. doi: 10.1016/j.curtheres.2020.100587. eCollection 2020.
9
Projecting the Long-Term Economic Impact of Once-Monthly Paliperidone Palmitate Versus Oral Atypical Antipsychotics in Medicaid Patients with Schizophrenia.预测每月注射一次棕榈酸帕利哌酮与口服非典型抗精神病药物治疗 Medicaid 精神分裂症患者的长期经济影响。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2020 Feb;26(2):176-185. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2020.26.2.176.
10
Evaluation of oral antipsychotic supplementation of select second-generation long-acting injectable antipsychotics in an acute-care psychiatric setting.在急性护理精神病学环境中对选定的第二代长效注射用抗精神病药物补充口服抗精神病药物的评估。
Ment Health Clin. 2019 Jan 4;9(1):18-23. doi: 10.9740/mhc.2019.01.018. eCollection 2019 Jan.