Fontaneto Diego, Panisi Martina, Mandrioli Mauro, Montardi Dario, Pavesi Maurizio, Cardini Andrea
Institute of Ecosystem Study, National Research Council of Italy, Largo Tonolli 50, 28922, Verbania Pallanza, Italy.
Departamento de Biologia Animal, Faculdade de Ciências da Universidade de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal.
Naturwissenschaften. 2017 Aug;104(7-8):55. doi: 10.1007/s00114-017-1475-3. Epub 2017 Jun 22.
Ecological indicators are currently developed to account for the different facets of loss of biological diversity due to direct or indirect effects of human activities. Most ecological indicators include species richness as a metric. Others, such as functional traits and phylogenetic diversity, account for differences in species, even when species richness is the same. Here, we describe and apply a different indicator, called morphoscape dimension, accounting for morphological variability across habitats in a geographical region. We use the case of ground beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae) in four different habitats in the Po Plain in Northern Italy to exemplify how to quantify the magnitude of the morphological space (i.e. the dimension of the morphoscape) occupied by the species in each habitat using geometric morphometrics. To this aim, we employed a variety of metrics of morphological disparity related to univariate size, and more complex multivariate shape and form. Our 'proof of concept' suggests that metrics assessing size and form might largely tend to simply mirror the information provided by species richness, whereas shape morphoscape disparity may be able to account for non-trivial differences in species traits amongst habitats. This is indicated by the woodland morphoscape being on average bigger than that of crops, the most species-rich habitat, despite having almost 20% less species. We conclude suggesting that the analysis of morphoscape dimension has the potential to become a new additional and complimentary tool in the hands of conservation biologists and ecologists to explore and quantify habitat complexity and inform decisions on management and conservation based on a wide set of ecological indicators.
目前正在开发生态指标,以说明由于人类活动的直接或间接影响导致生物多样性丧失的不同方面。大多数生态指标将物种丰富度作为一个衡量标准。其他指标,如功能性状和系统发育多样性,则考虑物种之间的差异,即使物种丰富度相同。在这里,我们描述并应用一种不同的指标,称为形态景观维度,它考虑了地理区域内不同栖息地的形态变异性。我们以意大利北部波河平原四个不同栖息地的步甲(鞘翅目:步甲科)为例,说明如何使用几何形态测量学来量化每个栖息地中物种所占据的形态空间的大小(即形态景观的维度)。为此,我们采用了多种与单变量大小相关的形态差异指标,以及更复杂的多变量形状和形态指标。我们的“概念验证”表明,评估大小和形态的指标可能在很大程度上倾向于简单地反映物种丰富度所提供的信息,而形状形态景观差异可能能够解释不同栖息地物种特征的重要差异。这体现在林地形态景观平均比作物形态景观大,尽管林地的物种数量比物种最丰富的作物栖息地少近20%。我们得出结论,认为形态景观维度分析有潜力成为保护生物学家和生态学家手中一种新的补充工具,用于探索和量化栖息地复杂性,并基于一系列生态指标为管理和保护决策提供信息。