• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[静脉曲张的腔内消融术与开放手术:一项评估尝试]

[Endovenous ablation versus open surgery for varicose veins : An attempt at an evaluation].

作者信息

Hartmann K, Stenger D, Hartmann M, Rafi-Stenger L

机构信息

Venenzentrum Freiburg, Zähringer Str. 14, 79108, Freiburg, Deutschland.

Venenzentrum Saarlouis, Provinzialstr. 34, 66740, Saarlouis, Deutschland.

出版信息

Hautarzt. 2017 Aug;68(8):603-613. doi: 10.1007/s00105-017-3996-2.

DOI:10.1007/s00105-017-3996-2
PMID:28643104
Abstract

Open and endovenous surgery of varicose veins provides an excellent way to treat varicose veins. However, there are great differences in the how the techniques are performed. No matter which procedure is carried out, there are standards that should be observed. The state of the art of open venous surgery with radical crossectomy is well-known, but unfortunately is still not always performed correctly nowadays. The state of the art of endovenous surgery has unfortunately not yet been sufficiently documented, but should be based on open-surgical techniques. How the standard of both methods today is (or should be) is described in detail in this work. A recurrence definition which applies to both techniques, is set up.

摘要

静脉曲张的开放手术和腔内手术为治疗静脉曲张提供了一种很好的方法。然而,这些技术的操作方式存在很大差异。无论进行哪种手术,都有应遵守的标准。根治性横断术的开放静脉手术的技术水平是众所周知的,但不幸的是,如今仍并非总是正确实施。腔内手术的技术水平不幸尚未得到充分记录,但应基于开放手术技术。本文详细描述了当今这两种方法的标准(或应有的标准)。建立了适用于这两种技术的复发定义。

相似文献

1
[Endovenous ablation versus open surgery for varicose veins : An attempt at an evaluation].[静脉曲张的腔内消融术与开放手术:一项评估尝试]
Hautarzt. 2017 Aug;68(8):603-613. doi: 10.1007/s00105-017-3996-2.
2
Recurrence types 3 years after endovenous thermal ablation in insufficient saphenofemoral junctions.静脉内热消融术后 3 年在不充分的股腘静脉交界处的复发类型。
J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord. 2021 Jan;9(1):137-145. doi: 10.1016/j.jvsv.2020.04.021. Epub 2020 May 1.
3
Relationship between great saphenous vein recanalization, venous symptoms reappearance, and varicose veins recurrence rates after endovenous radiofrequency ablation.大隐静脉再通与静脉症状再现及静脉消融后静脉曲张复发率的关系。
Phlebology. 2022 Oct;37(9):686-688. doi: 10.1177/02683555221114537. Epub 2022 Jul 9.
4
A randomized prospective long-term (>1 year) clinical trial comparing the efficacy and safety of radiofrequency ablation to 980 nm laser ablation of the great saphenous vein.一项比较大隐静脉射频消融与980纳米激光消融疗效及安全性的随机前瞻性长期(>1年)临床试验。
Phlebology. 2017 Jul;32(6):415-424. doi: 10.1177/0268355516658592. Epub 2016 Jul 15.
5
Re: 'Predictors of Recanalization of the Great Saphenous Vein in Randomized Controlled Trials 1 Year After Endovenous Thermal Ablation'.
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2016 Aug;52(2):268. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2016.04.021. Epub 2016 May 25.
6
A prospective double-blind randomized controlled trial of radiofrequency versus laser treatment of the great saphenous vein in patients with varicose veins.前瞻性双盲随机对照试验研究射频与激光治疗静脉曲张患者大隐静脉的效果。
Ann Surg. 2011 Dec;254(6):876-81. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e318230af5a.
7
Adjunctive proximal vein ligation with endovenous obliteration of great saphenous vein reflux: does it have clinical value?大隐静脉反流的腔内闭塞联合近端静脉结扎术:它有临床价值吗?
Ann Vasc Surg. 2007 Mar;21(2):155-8. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2006.10.017.
8
High ligation of the saphenofemoral junction in endovenous obliteration of varicose veins.
Vasc Endovascular Surg. 2008 Jun-Jul;42(3):235-8. doi: 10.1177/1538574407312647. Epub 2008 Jan 29.
9
Lower pain and faster treatment with mechanico-chemical endovenous ablation using ClariVein®.使用ClariVein®进行机械化学静脉内消融可减轻疼痛并加快治疗速度。
Phlebology. 2015 Dec;30(10):688-92. doi: 10.1177/0268355514553693. Epub 2014 Oct 8.
10
Randomised controlled trial comparing sapheno-femoral ligation and stripping of the great saphenous vein with endovenous laser ablation (980 nm) using local tumescent anaesthesia: one year results.随机对照试验比较局部肿胀麻醉下大隐静脉高位结扎剥脱术与 980nm 腔内激光消融术治疗大隐静脉曲张:一年结果。
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2010 Nov;40(5):649-56. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2010.08.007.

引用本文的文献

1
No More Venous Ulcers-What More Can We Do?告别静脉溃疡——我们还能做些什么?
J Clin Med. 2023 Sep 23;12(19):6153. doi: 10.3390/jcm12196153.
2
Endovenous (minimally invasive) procedures for treatment of varicose veins : The gentle and effective alternative to high ligation and stripping operations.治疗静脉曲张的静脉内(微创)手术:高位结扎剥脱术的温和有效替代方案。
Hautarzt. 2020 Dec;71(Suppl 2):67-73. doi: 10.1007/s00105-019-04532-y.
3
[Endovenous (minimally invasive) procedures for treatment of varicose veins : The gentle and effective alternative to high ligation and stripping operations].

本文引用的文献

1
Five-year follow-up of a randomized, controlled trial comparing saphenofemoral ligation and stripping of the great saphenous vein with endovenous laser ablation (980 nm) using local tumescent anesthesia.一项随机对照试验的五年随访,该试验比较了大隐静脉高位结扎剥脱术与使用局部肿胀麻醉的静脉内激光消融术(980纳米)。
J Vasc Surg. 2016 Feb;63(2):420-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2015.08.084. Epub 2015 Oct 23.
2
Treatment Modalities for Small Saphenous Vein Insufficiency: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.小隐静脉功能不全的治疗方式:系统评价与荟萃分析
J Endovasc Ther. 2016 Feb;23(1):199-211. doi: 10.1177/1526602815616375. Epub 2015 Nov 12.
3
[静脉内(微创)治疗静脉曲张的方法:高位结扎和剥脱手术的温和有效替代方案]
Hautarzt. 2020 Jan;71(1):12-19. doi: 10.1007/s00105-019-04520-2.
Same Site Recurrence is More Frequent After Endovenous Laser Ablation Compared with High Ligation and Stripping of the Great Saphenous Vein: 5 year Results of a Randomized Clinical Trial (RELACS Study).
与大隐静脉高位结扎剥脱术相比,腔内激光消融术后同部位复发更为常见:一项随机临床试验(RELACS研究)的5年结果
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2015 Nov;50(5):648-56. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2015.07.020. Epub 2015 Aug 28.
4
Endovenous laser ablation with and without high ligation compared to high ligation and stripping for treatment of great saphenous varicose veins: Results of a multicentre randomised controlled trial with up to 6 years follow-up.与高位结扎剥脱术相比,大隐静脉曲张治疗中单纯静脉内激光消融术、联合或不联合高位结扎术的疗效:一项长达6年随访的多中心随机对照试验结果
Phlebology. 2016 Feb;31(1):23-33. doi: 10.1177/0268355514555547. Epub 2014 Oct 22.
5
Randomized clinical trial comparing endovenous laser ablation and stripping of the great saphenous vein with clinical and duplex outcome after 5 years.随机对照临床试验比较静脉内激光消融与大隐静脉剥脱术治疗大隐静脉曲张的临床和双功能超声随访 5 年结果。
J Vasc Surg. 2013 Aug;58(2):421-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2012.12.048. Epub 2013 Jun 12.
6
[High ligation and vein stripping. The classic procedure].[高位结扎和静脉剥脱术。经典术式]
Hautarzt. 2012 Aug;63(8):616-21. doi: 10.1007/s00105-012-2419-7.
7
Comparable effectiveness of endovenous laser ablation and high ligation with stripping of the great saphenous vein: two-year results of a randomized clinical trial (RELACS study).大隐静脉腔内激光消融术与高位结扎剥脱术的疗效比较:一项随机临床试验的两年结果(RELACS研究)
Arch Dermatol. 2012 Jan;148(1):49-58. doi: 10.1001/archdermatol.2011.272. Epub 2011 Sep 19.
8
Randomized clinical trial of endovenous laser ablation compared with conventional surgery for great saphenous varicose veins.随机对照临床试验:静脉腔内激光消融术与传统手术治疗大隐静脉曲张的比较。
Br J Surg. 2011 Apr;98(4):501-10. doi: 10.1002/bjs.7394. Epub 2011 Jan 31.
9
Laser saphenous ablations in more than 1,000 limbs with long-term duplex examination follow-up.对1000余条肢体进行激光大隐静脉消融术,并进行长期双功超声检查随访。
Ann Vasc Surg. 2011 Jan;25(1):71-8. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2010.09.005.
10
Randomised controlled trial comparing sapheno-femoral ligation and stripping of the great saphenous vein with endovenous laser ablation (980 nm) using local tumescent anaesthesia: one year results.随机对照试验比较局部肿胀麻醉下大隐静脉高位结扎剥脱术与 980nm 腔内激光消融术治疗大隐静脉曲张:一年结果。
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2010 Nov;40(5):649-56. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2010.08.007.