• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

最小比例样本体积血小板细菌培养的产量提高。

Improved yield of minimal proportional sample volume platelet bacterial culture.

作者信息

Kamel Hany, Townsend Mary, Bravo Marjorie, Vassallo Ralph R

机构信息

Blood Systems, Inc, Scottsdale, Arizona.

出版信息

Transfusion. 2017 Oct;57(10):2413-2419. doi: 10.1111/trf.14198. Epub 2017 Jun 22.

DOI:10.1111/trf.14198
PMID:28643434
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Reports of septic transfusion reactions (STRs) after transfusion of culture-negative platelets (PLTs) justify more effective prevention strategies. Pathogen reduction technologies or performance of additional point-of-issue testing are proposed strategies to enhance safety through Day 5 of storage.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

Trima leukoreduced apheresis PLTs (APs) were collected during two study periods (45 and 31 months) using standard procedures, with target settings adjusted during the second period to maintain split rate after increased culture volume. Primary testing for bacterial contamination was performed using BacT/ALERT 3D with sampling from the mother bag 24 to 36 hours after collection. Two culture approaches were compared: in Period A, an 8-mL sample in one aerobic culture bottle (CB), and in Period B a minimal proportional sample volume (PSV) of at least 3.8% of mother bag volume into one to three aerobic CBs (7-10 mL per bottle).

RESULTS

In Periods A and B, 188,389 and 159,098 AP collections were tested, respectively. The true-positive (TP) rate in Period A was 0.90 per 10,000 collections and in Period B was 1.83 per 10,000 (p < 0.05). In Period B, 12 of 29 (41%) TP results had discrepant CB results (DCBRs; at least one of multiple bottles without growth). The false-positive rate in Period B, 15.05 per 10,000 collections, was significantly higher than that of Period A, 3.66 per 10,000. One contaminated collection resulting in STR(s) was reported in each study period. Implementation of PSV was operationally successful and did not impact the AP split rate.

CONCLUSION

Proportional sample volume improved the sensitivity of primary testing and identified collections that could have escaped detection had only a single bottle with 8- to 10-mL volume been used. PSV may represent another approach to enhanced PLT safety for 5-day storage without a requirement for secondary testing.

摘要

背景

关于输注培养阴性血小板(PLT)后发生败血症性输血反应(STR)的报告证明需要更有效的预防策略。病原体灭活技术或在发放时进行额外检测是为提高储存第5天安全性而提出的策略。

研究设计与方法

在两个研究阶段(分别为45个月和31个月)采用标准程序采集Trima白细胞滤除单采血小板(AP),在第二阶段调整目标设置以在培养体积增加后维持分离率。采集后24至36小时从母袋取样,使用BacT/ALERT 3D进行细菌污染的初步检测。比较了两种培养方法:在A阶段,将8 mL样本接种于一个需氧培养瓶(CB)中;在B阶段,将至少占母袋体积3.8%的最小比例样本量(PSV)接种于一至三个需氧CB中(每个瓶子7 - 10 mL)。

结果

在A阶段和B阶段,分别检测了188,389次和159,098次AP采集。A阶段的真阳性(TP)率为每10,000次采集0.90例,B阶段为每10,000次采集1.83例(p < 0.05)。在B阶段,29例TP结果中有12例(41%)出现培养瓶结果不一致(DCBR;多个瓶子中至少有一个无生长)。B阶段的假阳性率为每10,000次采集15.05例,显著高于A阶段的每10,000次采集3.66例。每个研究阶段均报告了1例因污染采集导致的STR。PSV的实施在操作上是成功的,且未影响AP的分离率。

结论

比例样本量提高了初步检测的灵敏度,并识别出若仅使用一个8至10 mL体积的瓶子可能漏检的数据。PSV可能代表了另一种无需二次检测即可提高PLT储存5天安全性的方法。

相似文献

1
Improved yield of minimal proportional sample volume platelet bacterial culture.最小比例样本体积血小板细菌培养的产量提高。
Transfusion. 2017 Oct;57(10):2413-2419. doi: 10.1111/trf.14198. Epub 2017 Jun 22.
2
Apheresis technology correlates with bacterial contamination of platelets and reported septic transfusion reactions.血液成分单采技术与血小板的细菌污染以及报告的败血症性输血反应相关。
Transfusion. 2017 Dec;57(12):2969-2976. doi: 10.1111/trf.14308. Epub 2017 Sep 6.
3
Bacterial screening of apheresis platelets and the residual risk of septic transfusion reactions: the American Red Cross experience (2004-2006).单采血小板的细菌筛查及感染性输血反应的残余风险:美国红十字会的经验(2004 - 2006年)
Transfusion. 2007 Jul;47(7):1134-42. doi: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2007.01248.x.
4
Bacterial contamination and septic transfusion reaction rates associated with platelet components before and after introduction of primary culture: experience at a US Academic Medical Center 1991 through 2017.血小板成分制品在实施原代培养前后的细菌污染和脓毒输血反应率:美国学术医疗中心 1991 年至 2017 年的经验。
Transfusion. 2020 May;60(5):974-985. doi: 10.1111/trf.15780. Epub 2020 May 1.
5
Bacterial detection in apheresis platelets: blood systems experience with a two-bottle and one-bottle culture system.单采血小板中的细菌检测:血液系统使用双瓶和单瓶培养系统的经验
Transfusion. 2008 Sep;48(9):1842-52. doi: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2008.01763.x. Epub 2008 May 22.
6
Monitoring of apheresis platelet bacterial contamination with an automated liquid culture system: a university experience.使用自动化液体培养系统监测单采血小板的细菌污染:一所大学的经验
Transfusion. 2003 Jul;43(7):974-8. doi: 10.1046/j.1537-2995.2003.00438.x.
7
Bacterial contamination of whole-blood-derived platelets: the introduction of sample diversion and prestorage pooling with culture testing in the American Red Cross.全血来源血小板的细菌污染:美国红十字会引入样本分流、预储存合并及培养检测
Transfusion. 2008 Nov;48(11):2348-55. doi: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2008.01853.x. Epub 2008 Jul 22.
8
The residual risk of sepsis: modeling the effect of concentration on bacterial detection in two-bottle culture systems and an estimation of false-negative culture rates.脓毒症的残余风险:模拟双瓶培养系统中浓度对细菌检测的影响及假阴性培养率的估计
Transfusion. 2007 Aug;47(8):1381-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2007.01326.x.
9
In-house validation of the BACTEC 9240 blood culture system for detection of bacterial contamination in platelet concentrates.BACTEC 9240血培养系统用于检测血小板浓缩物中细菌污染的室内验证
Transfusion. 2005 Jul;45(7):1138-42. doi: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2005.04343.x.
10
Improving the performance of culture-based bacterial screening by increasing the sample volume from 4 mL to 8 mL in aerobic culture bottles.通过将需氧培养瓶中的样本体积从 4 毫升增加到 8 毫升来提高基于培养的细菌筛选的性能。
Transfusion. 2012 Jul;52(7):1576-82. doi: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2011.03489.x. Epub 2011 Dec 29.

引用本文的文献

1
Bacterial Contamination of Platelet Products.血小板制品的细菌污染
Microorganisms. 2024 Jan 26;12(2):258. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms12020258.
2
Changing Strategies for the Detection of Bacteria in Platelet Components in Ireland: From Primary and Secondary Culture (2010-2020) to Large Volume Delayed Sampling (2020-2023).爱尔兰血小板成分中细菌检测策略的转变:从初代和二代培养(2010 - 2020年)到大量延迟采样(2020 - 2023年)
Microorganisms. 2023 Nov 14;11(11):2765. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms11112765.
3
Acquired platelet storage container leaks and contamination with environmental bacteria: A preventable cause of bacterial sepsis.
获得性血小板储存容器泄漏和环境污染细菌:细菌败血症的可预防原因。
Transfusion. 2022 Mar;62(3):641-650. doi: 10.1111/trf.16776. Epub 2021 Dec 20.
4
Microbiological Screening of Platelet Concentrates in Europe.欧洲血小板浓缩物的微生物学筛查
Transfus Med Hemother. 2019 Apr;46(2):76-86. doi: 10.1159/000499349. Epub 2019 Mar 20.
5
Transfusion-Transmitted Infections Reported to the National Healthcare Safety Network Hemovigilance Module.国家医疗保健安全网络血液监测模块报告的输血传播感染。
Transfus Med Rev. 2019 Apr;33(2):84-91. doi: 10.1016/j.tmrv.2019.01.001. Epub 2019 Jan 25.
6
The argument(s) for lowering the US minimum required content of apheresis platelet components.降低美国单采血小板成分最低要求含量的理由。
Transfusion. 2019 Feb;59(2):779-788. doi: 10.1111/trf.15036. Epub 2018 Nov 21.
7
Bacterial contamination of platelets for transfusion: strategies for prevention.血小板输注的细菌污染:预防策略。
Crit Care. 2018 Oct 27;22(1):271. doi: 10.1186/s13054-018-2212-9.
8
Fatal Sepsis Associated with Bacterial Contamination of Platelets - Utah and California, August 2017.致命性脓毒症与血小板细菌污染相关 - 犹他州和加利福尼亚州,2017 年 8 月。
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2018 Jun 29;67(25):718-722. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6725a4.