• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项多中心、随机对照、非劣效性试验,比较经鼻高流量通气与经鼻持续气道正压通气作为澳大利亚非三级特殊护理病房中出生的患有早期呼吸窘迫的新生儿的主要支持治疗方法(HUNTER试验):研究方案。

A multicentre, randomised controlled, non-inferiority trial, comparing nasal high flow with nasal continuous positive airway pressure as primary support for newborn infants with early respiratory distress born in Australian non-tertiary special care nurseries (the HUNTER trial): study protocol.

作者信息

Manley Brett J, Roberts Calum T, Arnolda Gaston R B, Wright Ian M R, Owen Louise S, Dalziel Kim M, Foster Jann P, Davis Peter G, Buckmaster Adam G

机构信息

Neonatal Services and Newborn Research Centre, The Royal Women's Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.

Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2017 Jun 23;7(6):e016746. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016746.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016746
PMID:28645982
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5541635/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Nasal high-flow (nHF) therapy is a popular mode of respiratory support for newborn infants. Evidence for nHF use is predominantly from neonatal intensive care units (NICUs). There are no randomised trials of nHF use in non-tertiary special care nurseries (SCNs). We hypothesise that nHF is non-inferior to nasal continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) as primary support for newborn infants with respiratory distress, in the population cared for in non-tertiary SCNs.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

The HUNTER trial is an unblinded Australian multicentre, randomised, non-inferiority trial. Infants are eligible if born at a gestational age ≥31 weeks with birth weight ≥1200 g and admitted to a participating non-tertiary SCN, are <24 hours old at randomisation and require non-invasive respiratory support or supplemental oxygen for >1 hour. Infants are randomised to treatment with either nHF or CPAP. The primary outcome is treatment failure within 72 hours of randomisation, as determined by objective oxygenation, apnoea or blood gas criteria or by a clinical decision that urgent intubation and mechanical ventilation, or transfer to a tertiary NICU, is required. Secondary outcomes include incidence of pneumothorax requiring drainage, duration of respiratory support, supplemental oxygen and hospitalisation, costs associated with hospital care, cost-effectiveness, parental stress and satisfaction and nursing workload.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

Multisite ethical approval for the study has been granted by The Royal Children's Hospital, Melbourne, Australia (Trial Reference No. 34222), and by each participating site. The trial is currently recruiting in eight centres in Victoria and New South Wales, Australia, with one previous site no longer recruiting. The trial results will be published in a peer-reviewed journal and will be presented at national and international conferences.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ANZCTR): ACTRN12614001203640; pre-results.

摘要

引言

经鼻高流量(nHF)治疗是新生儿常用的呼吸支持模式。nHF使用的证据主要来自新生儿重症监护病房(NICU)。在非三级特殊护理病房(SCN)中,尚无关于nHF使用的随机试验。我们假设,在非三级SCN护理的人群中,nHF作为呼吸窘迫新生儿的主要支持手段,不劣于经鼻持续气道正压通气(CPAP)。

方法与分析

HUNTER试验是一项开放的澳大利亚多中心随机非劣效性试验。孕龄≥31周、出生体重≥1200g且入住参与研究的非三级SCN的婴儿符合入选条件,随机分组时年龄<24小时,且需要无创呼吸支持或补充氧气超过1小时。婴儿被随机分为接受nHF或CPAP治疗。主要结局是随机分组后72小时内的治疗失败,根据客观氧合、呼吸暂停或血气标准,或根据需要紧急插管和机械通气或转至三级NICU的临床决定来确定。次要结局包括需要引流的气胸发生率、呼吸支持持续时间、补充氧气和住院时间、与住院护理相关的费用、成本效益、父母压力和满意度以及护理工作量。

伦理与传播

该研究已获得澳大利亚墨尔本皇家儿童医院(试验参考编号34222)以及每个参与研究地点的多中心伦理批准。该试验目前正在澳大利亚维多利亚州和新南威尔士州的八个中心招募患者,之前的一个地点已停止招募。试验结果将发表在同行评审期刊上,并将在国内和国际会议上展示。

试验注册号

澳大利亚和新西兰临床试验注册中心(ANZCTR):ACTRN12614001203640;预结果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0d2a/5541635/0ce02601911c/bmjopen-2017-016746f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0d2a/5541635/0ce02601911c/bmjopen-2017-016746f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0d2a/5541635/0ce02601911c/bmjopen-2017-016746f01.jpg

相似文献

1
A multicentre, randomised controlled, non-inferiority trial, comparing nasal high flow with nasal continuous positive airway pressure as primary support for newborn infants with early respiratory distress born in Australian non-tertiary special care nurseries (the HUNTER trial): study protocol.一项多中心、随机对照、非劣效性试验,比较经鼻高流量通气与经鼻持续气道正压通气作为澳大利亚非三级特殊护理病房中出生的患有早期呼吸窘迫的新生儿的主要支持治疗方法(HUNTER试验):研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2017 Jun 23;7(6):e016746. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016746.
2
A multicentre, randomised controlled, non-inferiority trial, comparing high flow therapy with nasal continuous positive airway pressure as primary support for preterm infants with respiratory distress (the HIPSTER trial): study protocol.一项多中心、随机对照、非劣效性试验,比较高流量疗法与经鼻持续气道正压通气作为呼吸窘迫早产儿主要支持治疗方法(HIPSTER试验):研究方案
BMJ Open. 2015 Jun 24;5(6):e008483. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008483.
3
Refining the Use of Nasal High-Flow Therapy as Primary Respiratory Support for Preterm Infants.细化经鼻高流量治疗在早产儿原发性呼吸支持中的应用。
J Pediatr. 2018 May;196:65-70.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2018.01.031. Epub 2018 Mar 9.
4
Nasal High-Flow Therapy for Newborn Infants in Special Care Nurseries.新生儿重症监护病房中新生儿的经鼻高流量治疗。
N Engl J Med. 2019 May 23;380(21):2031-2040. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1812077.
5
Cost-Effectiveness of Nasal High Flow Versus CPAP for Newborn Infants in Special-Care Nurseries.鼻塞持续气道正压通气与经鼻高流量湿化氧疗在特护病房新生儿中成本效益的比较。
Pediatrics. 2021 Aug;148(2). doi: 10.1542/peds.2020-020438. Epub 2021 Jul 16.
6
Predicting Nasal High-Flow Treatment Success in Newborn Infants with Respiratory Distress Cared for in Nontertiary Hospitals.预测非三甲医院新生儿呼吸窘迫接受鼻塞高流量治疗的成功率。
J Pediatr. 2020 Dec;227:135-141.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2020.07.037. Epub 2020 Jul 15.
7
Study protocol for the POPART study-Prophylactic Oropharyngeal surfactant for Preterm infants: A Randomised Trial.POPART研究方案——用于早产儿的预防性口咽表面活性剂:一项随机试验
BMJ Open. 2020 Jul 20;10(7):e035994. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-035994.
8
High-Flow Nasal Cannula versus Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure for Primary Respiratory Support in Preterm Infants with Respiratory Distress: A Randomized Controlled Trial.高流量鼻导管与经鼻持续气道正压通气用于呼吸窘迫早产儿的初始呼吸支持:一项随机对照试验
Neonatology. 2018;113(3):235-241. doi: 10.1159/000484400. Epub 2018 Jan 23.
9
Multicentre, randomised trial of preterm infants receiving caffeine and less invasive surfactant administration compared with caffeine and early continuous positive airway pressure (CaLI trial): study protocol.多中心、随机临床试验比较早产儿接受咖啡因和较少侵入性表面活性剂给药与咖啡因和早期持续气道正压通气(CaLI 试验):研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2021 Jan 22;11(1):e038343. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-038343.
10
Nasal High-Flow Therapy for Primary Respiratory Support in Preterm Infants.经鼻高流量治疗用于早产儿的初级呼吸支持
N Engl J Med. 2016 Sep 22;375(12):1142-51. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1603694.

引用本文的文献

1
Non-invasive respiratory support in preterm infants as primary mode: a network meta-analysis.以无创呼吸支持作为主要模式用于早产儿:一项网状Meta分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Jul 1;7(7):CD014895. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014895.pub2.
2
Influence of high-flow nasal cannulae on clinical outcomes in elderly patients with acute respiratory failure: a prognostic risk factor analysis.高流量鼻导管对老年急性呼吸衰竭患者临床结局的影响:一项预后危险因素分析。
Am J Transl Res. 2024 Aug 15;16(8):3510-3518. doi: 10.62347/URHG8462. eCollection 2024.
3
High flow nasal cannula for respiratory support in term infants.

本文引用的文献

1
Nasal High-Flow Therapy for Primary Respiratory Support in Preterm Infants.经鼻高流量治疗用于早产儿的初级呼吸支持
N Engl J Med. 2016 Sep 22;375(12):1142-51. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1603694.
2
Heated, Humidified High-Flow Nasal Cannula vs Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure for Respiratory Distress Syndrome of Prematurity: A Randomized Clinical Noninferiority Trial.加热湿化高流量鼻导管与经鼻持续气道正压通气治疗早产儿呼吸窘迫综合征的随机临床非劣效性试验
JAMA Pediatr. 2016 Aug 8. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2016.1243.
3
Changes in the use of humidified high flow nasal cannula oxygen.
经鼻高流量湿化氧疗在足月儿呼吸支持中的应用。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Aug 4;8(8):CD011010. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011010.pub2.
4
Best practices, challenges and innovations in pediatrics in 2019.2019 年儿科的最佳实践、挑战和创新。
Ital J Pediatr. 2020 Nov 30;46(1):176. doi: 10.1186/s13052-020-00941-1.
5
Current insights in non-invasive ventilation for the treatment of neonatal respiratory disease.当前关于新生儿呼吸疾病无创通气治疗的新见解。
Ital J Pediatr. 2019 Aug 19;45(1):105. doi: 10.1186/s13052-019-0707-x.
高流量鼻导管湿化吸氧的使用变化
Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2016 Jul;101(4):F371-2. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2016-310497. Epub 2016 May 12.
4
High flow nasal cannula for respiratory support in preterm infants.用于早产儿呼吸支持的高流量鼻导管
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Feb 22;2(2):CD006405. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006405.pub3.
5
High-flow support in very preterm infants in Australia and New Zealand.澳大利亚和新西兰极早产儿的高流量支持
Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2016 Sep;101(5):F401-3. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2015-309328. Epub 2015 Dec 17.
6
Continuous distending pressure for respiratory distress in preterm infants.持续扩张压力用于治疗早产儿呼吸窘迫。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Jul 4;2015(7):CD002271. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002271.pub2.
7
Noninvasive Ventilation With vs Without Early Surfactant to Prevent Chronic Lung Disease in Preterm Infants: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.经鼻持续气道正压通气联合与不联合早期肺表面活性物质预防早产儿慢性肺疾病的系统评价和 Meta 分析。
JAMA Pediatr. 2015 Aug;169(8):731-9. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2015.0510.
8
Assessment of pain during application of nasal-continuous positive airway pressure and heated, humidified high-flow nasal cannulae in preterm infants.评估鼻持续气道正压通气及加热湿化高流量鼻导管应用于早产儿时的疼痛情况。
J Perinatol. 2015 Apr;35(4):263-7. doi: 10.1038/jp.2014.206. Epub 2014 Nov 27.
9
Nursing perceptions of high-flow nasal cannulae treatment for very preterm infants.护士对极早产儿高流量鼻导管治疗的看法。
J Paediatr Child Health. 2014 Oct;50(10):806-10. doi: 10.1111/jpc.12636. Epub 2014 Jun 18.
10
A randomized pilot study comparing heated humidified high-flow nasal cannulae with NIPPV for RDS.一项比较加热湿化高流量鼻导管与无创正压通气治疗呼吸窘迫综合征的随机试点研究。
Pediatr Pulmonol. 2015 Jun;50(6):576-83. doi: 10.1002/ppul.23022. Epub 2014 Mar 12.