Department of Psychology and Djavad Mowafaghian Centre for Brain Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, V6T 1Z4, Canada.
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2017 Sep;234(18):2777-2792. doi: 10.1007/s00213-017-4670-1. Epub 2017 Jun 24.
Both prefrontal cortex (PFC) GABA and NMDA transmission regulate attentional processes, yet how they may differentially regulate signal detection or other aspects of attention is unclear.
We examined PFC GABA and NMDA receptor regulation of attention using a sustained attention task (SAT) permitting identification of distinct forms of impairments. As this task requires implementation of conditional rules, we also investigated how reducing PFC GABA transmission affected performance of visual and auditory conditional discriminations.
Male rats were well-trained on the SAT that required identifying whether a brief visual stimulus (500-50 ms) was present/absent by pressing one of two levers. They then received intra-PFC infusions of the GABA antagonist bicuculline (12.5-50 ng), the NMDA antagonist MK-801 (6 μg), and i.p. injections of MK-801 (0.1-0.3 mg/kg) prior to testing. Separate groups were trained either on a similar task where the visual stimulus was presented for 2.5 s, or a task where presentation of one of two auditory cues required responding on a left or right lever.
Both doses of bicuculline impaired vigilance, selectively increasing errors during nonsignal trials. Intra-PFC MK-801 induced subtle impairments at short signal durations. Systemic MK-801 impaired performance and increased response latencies. Visual and auditory conditional discrimination was impaired by 50 ng, but not 12.5 ng of bicuculline.
These findings highlight a key role for PFC GABA transmission in reducing sensitivity to distractors during attentional performance. Furthermore, they reveal that disruption of GABA signaling can interfere with the ability to implement conditional rules.
前额叶皮层(PFC)GABA 和 NMDA 传递都调节注意力过程,但它们如何可能以不同的方式调节信号检测或注意力的其他方面尚不清楚。
我们使用持续注意力任务(SAT)检查 PFC GABA 和 NMDA 受体对注意力的调节,该任务允许识别不同形式的损伤。由于该任务需要实施条件规则,我们还研究了减少 PFC GABA 传递如何影响视觉和听觉条件辨别能力。
雄性大鼠在 SAT 上接受了良好的训练,该任务要求通过按下两个杠杆之一来确定短暂的视觉刺激(500-50ms)是否存在/不存在。然后,他们在测试前接受 PFC 内注射 GABA 拮抗剂荷包牡丹碱(12.5-50ng)、NMDA 拮抗剂 MK-801(6μg)和腹腔注射 MK-801(0.1-0.3mg/kg)。单独的一组接受类似的任务训练,其中视觉刺激持续 2.5 秒,或者接受两个听觉提示之一的提示需要在左或右杠杆上做出反应。
两种剂量的荷包牡丹碱都损害了警惕性,选择性地增加了无信号试验中的错误。PFC 内的 MK-801 在短信号持续时间内引起轻微的损伤。全身性 MK-801 损害了表现并增加了反应潜伏期。50ng 的荷包牡丹碱损害了视觉和听觉条件辨别能力,但 12.5ng 的荷包牡丹碱则没有。
这些发现强调了 PFC GABA 传递在减少注意力表现中对干扰物的敏感性方面的关键作用。此外,它们表明 GABA 信号的中断会干扰实施条件规则的能力。