• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

CDMAM 模体图像模拟及阈值金厚度测量不确定度估计

Simulation of images of CDMAM phantom and the estimation of measurement uncertainties of threshold gold thickness.

作者信息

Mackenzie Alistair, Eales Timothy D, Dunn Hannah L, Yip Braidley Mary, Dance David R, Young Kenneth C

机构信息

National Coordinating Centre for the Physics in Mammography (NCCPM), Level B, St Luke's Wing, Royal Surrey County Hospital, Guildford GU2 7XX, UK.

Department of Physics, University of Surrey, Guildford GU2 7XH, UK.

出版信息

Phys Med. 2017 Jul;39:137-146. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2017.06.019. Epub 2017 Jun 21.

DOI:10.1016/j.ejmp.2017.06.019
PMID:28647448
Abstract

PURPOSE

To demonstrate a method of simulating mammography images of the CDMAM phantom and to investigate the coefficient of variation (CoV) in the threshold gold thickness (t) measurements associated with use of the phantom.

METHODS

The noise and sharpness of Hologic Dimensions and GE Essential mammography systems were characterized to provide data for the simulation. The simulation method was validated by comparing the t results of real and simulated images of the CDMAM phantom for three different doses and the two systems. The detection matrices produced from each of 64 images using CDCOM software were randomly resampled to create 512 sets of 8, 16 and 32 images to estimate the CoV of t. Sets of simulated images for a range of doses were used to estimate the CoVs for a range of diameters and threshold thicknesses.

RESULTS

No significant differences were found for t or the CoV between real and simulated CDMAM images. It was shown that resampling from 256 images was required for estimating the CoV. The CoV was around 4% using 16 images for most of the phantom but is over double that for details near the edge of the phantom.

CONCLUSIONS

We have demonstrated a method to simulate images of the CDMAM phantom for different systems at a range of doses. We provide data for calculating uncertainties in t. Any future review of the European guidelines should take into consideration the calculated uncertainties for the 0.1mm detail.

摘要

目的

演示一种模拟CDMAM体模乳腺X线摄影图像的方法,并研究与该体模使用相关的阈值金厚度(t)测量中的变异系数(CoV)。

方法

对Hologic Dimensions和GE Essential乳腺摄影系统的噪声和清晰度进行表征,以提供模拟数据。通过比较三种不同剂量下CDMAM体模的真实图像和模拟图像以及两个系统的t结果,验证了模拟方法。使用CDCOM软件从64幅图像中的每一幅生成的检测矩阵被随机重采样,以创建512组8幅、16幅和32幅图像,以估计t的CoV。使用一系列剂量的模拟图像集来估计一系列直径和阈值厚度的CoV。

结果

在真实和模拟的CDMAM图像之间,未发现t或CoV有显著差异。结果表明,估计CoV需要从256幅图像中进行重采样。对于体模的大部分区域,使用16幅图像时CoV约为4%,但对于体模边缘附近的细节,CoV超过其两倍。

结论

我们演示了一种在一系列剂量下为不同系统模拟CDMAM体模图像的方法。我们提供了计算t不确定性的数据。欧洲指南未来的任何审查都应考虑0.1mm细节的计算不确定性。

相似文献

1
Simulation of images of CDMAM phantom and the estimation of measurement uncertainties of threshold gold thickness.CDMAM 模体图像模拟及阈值金厚度测量不确定度估计
Phys Med. 2017 Jul;39:137-146. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2017.06.019. Epub 2017 Jun 21.
2
Performance evaluation of contrast-detail in full field digital mammography systems using ideal (Hotelling) observer vs. conventional automated analysis of CDMAM images for quality control of contrast-detail characteristics.使用理想(霍特林)观察者对全视野数字乳腺摄影系统中的对比度细节进行性能评估,与对CDMAM图像进行传统自动分析以控制对比度细节特征的质量。
Phys Med. 2015 Nov;31(7):741-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2015.02.008. Epub 2015 Feb 28.
3
Analysis of the threshold image contrast obtained with the CDMAM 3.4 and CDMAM 4.0 phantoms.CDMAM 3.4 和 CDMAM 4.0 体模获得的阈值图像对比度分析。
Phys Eng Sci Med. 2023 Jun;46(2):897-902. doi: 10.1007/s13246-023-01264-1. Epub 2023 Apr 25.
4
Evaluation of automated CDMAM readings for non-standard CDMAM imaging conditions: grid-less acquisitions and scatter correction.非标准CDMAM成像条件下自动CDMAM读数的评估:无网格采集和散射校正。
Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2015 Jul;165(1-4):350-3. doi: 10.1093/rpd/ncv085. Epub 2015 Mar 26.
5
Contrast-detail phantom scoring methodology.对比细节体模评分方法。
Med Phys. 2005 Mar;32(3):807-14. doi: 10.1118/1.1862097.
6
Investigation of the performance of digital mammographic X-ray equipment: determination of noise equivalent quanta (NEQQC) and detective quantum efficiency (DQEQC) compared with the automated analysis of CDMAM test images with CDCOM and CDIC programs.数字乳腺X射线设备性能的研究:与使用CDCOM和CDIC程序对CDMAM测试图像进行自动分析相比,噪声等效量子数(NEQQC)和探测量子效率(DQEQC)的测定
Rofo. 2013 Jul;185(7):635-43. doi: 10.1055/s-0033-1335220. Epub 2013 Jun 25.
7
Effect of image quality on calcification detection in digital mammography.数字乳腺摄影中图像质量对钙化检测的影响。
Med Phys. 2012 Jun;39(6):3202-13. doi: 10.1118/1.4718571.
8
On the dose sensitivity of a new CDMAM phantom.关于新型CDMAM模体的剂量敏感性
Phys Med Biol. 2015 May 7;60(9):N177-85. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/60/9/N177. Epub 2015 Apr 16.
9
Conversion of mammographic images to appear with the noise and sharpness characteristics of a different detector and x-ray system.将乳腺 X 光图像转换为具有不同探测器和 X 射线系统的噪声和锐度特征。
Med Phys. 2012 May;39(5):2721-34. doi: 10.1118/1.4704525.
10
[Derivation of Conversion Formula of Image Quality Figure (IQF) Values by Old and New Analysis Software for Mammographic Contrast-detail Phantom].[乳腺造影对比细节体模新旧分析软件图像质量指数(IQF)值转换公式的推导]
Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi. 2023 Feb 20;79(2):121-127. doi: 10.6009/jjrt.2023-1326. Epub 2023 Jan 16.

引用本文的文献

1
Analysis of the threshold image contrast obtained with the CDMAM 3.4 and CDMAM 4.0 phantoms.CDMAM 3.4 和 CDMAM 4.0 体模获得的阈值图像对比度分析。
Phys Eng Sci Med. 2023 Jun;46(2):897-902. doi: 10.1007/s13246-023-01264-1. Epub 2023 Apr 25.
2
Development of an algorithm to convert mammographic images to appear as if acquired with different technique factors.开发一种算法,用于将乳腺钼靶图像转换为看起来像是用不同技术参数采集的图像。
J Med Imaging (Bellingham). 2022 May;9(3):033504. doi: 10.1117/1.JMI.9.3.033504. Epub 2022 Jun 8.
3
On the relevance of modulation transfer function measurements in digital mammography quality control.
调制传递函数测量在数字乳腺摄影质量控制中的相关性
J Med Imaging (Bellingham). 2021 Mar;8(2):023505. doi: 10.1117/1.JMI.8.2.023505. Epub 2021 Apr 27.