Alexopoulos George S, O'Neil Robert, Banerjee Samprit, Raue Patrick J, Victoria Lindsay W, Bress Jennifer N, Pollari Cristina, Arean Patricia A
Weill-Cornell Institute of Geriatric Psychiatry, United States.
Weill Cornell Medical College, Department of Healthcare Policy and Research, United States.
J Affect Disord. 2017 Oct 15;221:192-197. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2017.06.037. Epub 2017 Jun 19.
Engage grew out of the need for streamlined psychotherapies that can be accurately used by community therapists in late-life depression. Engage was based on the view that dysfunction of reward networks is the principal mechanism mediating depressive symptoms. Accordingly, Engage uses "reward exposure" (exposure to meaningful activities) and assumes that repeated activation of reward networks will normalize these systems. This study examined whether change in a behavioral activation scale, an index of reward system function, predicts change in depressive symptomatology.
The participants (N = 48) were older adults with major depression treated with 9 weekly sessions of Engage and assessed 27 weeks after treatment. Depression was assessed with the 24-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D) and behavioral activation with the four subscales of Behavioral Activation for Depression Scale (activation, avoidance/rumination, work impairment, social impairment) at baseline, 6 weeks (mid-treatment), 9 weeks (end of treatment), and 36 weeks.
Change only in the Activation subscale during successive periods of assessment predicted depression severity (HAM-D) at the end of each period (F = 21.05, p<0.0001). An increase of one standard deviation in the Activation score resulted in a 2.04 (95% CI: 1.17-2.92) point decrease in HAM-D. For every one point increase in the Activation score, HAM-D was decreased by 0.22 points (95% CI: 0.12-0.31).
No comparison group. Partial overlap of Activation Subscale with HAM-D, lack of detailed neurocognitive assessment and social support.
Change in behavioral activation predicts improvement of depressive symptoms and signs in depressed older adults treated with Engage.
“Engage”疗法源于对简化心理治疗方法的需求,这类方法可供社区治疗师准确用于治疗老年抑郁症。“Engage”疗法基于这样一种观点,即奖赏网络功能失调是介导抑郁症状的主要机制。因此,“Engage”疗法采用“奖赏暴露”(接触有意义的活动),并假定奖赏网络的反复激活将使这些系统恢复正常。本研究考察了作为奖赏系统功能指标的行为激活量表的变化是否能预测抑郁症状的变化。
参与者(N = 48)为患有重度抑郁症的老年人,接受了为期9周的“Engage”疗法治疗,并在治疗后27周进行评估。在基线、6周(治疗中期)、9周(治疗结束)和36周时,使用24项汉密尔顿抑郁量表(HAM-D)评估抑郁情况,使用抑郁行为激活量表的四个子量表(激活、回避/沉思、工作障碍、社交障碍)评估行为激活情况。
在连续评估期间,仅激活子量表的变化可预测每个评估期结束时的抑郁严重程度(HAM-D)(F = 21.05,p<0.0001)。激活得分每增加一个标准差,HAM-D得分就会降低2.04(95%置信区间:1.17 - 2.92)分。激活得分每增加1分,HAM-D得分就会降低0.22分(95%置信区间:0.12 - 0.31)。
无对照组。激活子量表与HAM-D部分重叠,缺乏详细的神经认知评估和社会支持。
行为激活的变化可预测接受“Engage”疗法治疗的抑郁老年人抑郁症状和体征的改善情况。