• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在低危症状患者人群的 CT 结肠成像中检测潜在相关的结外和结直肠发现。

Detection of potentially relevant extracolonic and colorectal findings at CT colonography in a low-risk symptomatic patient population.

机构信息

Department of Radiology, Viecuri Medical Centre, Venlo, The Netherlands.

Department of Radiology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine & Public Health, Madison, USA.

出版信息

Abdom Radiol (NY). 2017 Dec;42(12):2799-2806. doi: 10.1007/s00261-017-1221-5.

DOI:10.1007/s00261-017-1221-5
PMID:28647771
Abstract

PURPOSE

CT colonography (CTC) is a widely accepted examination tool for detection of colorectal lesions but evidence of the proportions of relevant extracolonic findings (ECF) in a large symptomatic but still relatively low-risk cohort is lacking, as well as their relationship to symptoms, age, and sex.

METHODS

All patients (n = 3208) with colorectal symptoms, imaged between January 2007 and September 2016 with first-time CTC, were retrospectively selected. The majority (96.7%) was examined with low-dose unenhanced protocol. The most relevant ECF and colorectal lesions (≥6 mm) were prospectively assessed according to C-RADS classifications. Follow-up was elaborated based on the electronic record review. Chi-square test was utilized for evaluating the associations between relevant findings and symptoms, age, and sex.

RESULTS

A total of 270 (8.4%) patients were classified as C-RADS E3, 63 (2.0%) patients as C-RADS E4, and 437 (13.6%) patients were assessed with colorectal lesions (C-RADS C2-4). At follow-up, two thirds of ECF turned out to be a malignancy or relevant disease that required further medical attention. The proportion of ECF was not related to specific colorectal symptoms. Patients aged ≥65 years and men had significantly higher proportions of ECF than younger patients (C-RADS E3 p = 0.005; C-RADS E4 p < 0.001) and women (C-RADS E3 p = 0.013; C-RADS E4 p = 0.009), respectively.

CONCLUSION

Proportions of relevant ECF and colorectal findings are relatively low in symptomatic low-risk patients. By use of CTC as a singular examination, especially in elderly patients, most colonoscopies can be avoided with the benefit of diagnosing relevant ECF without introducing substantial over-diagnosis.

摘要

目的

CT 结肠成像(CTC)是一种广泛接受的结直肠病变检测工具,但缺乏大量有症状但风险相对较低的队列中相关的结外发现(ECF)的比例及其与症状、年龄和性别的关系的证据。

方法

回顾性选择 2007 年 1 月至 2016 年 9 月期间首次接受 CTC 成像的有结直肠症状的所有患者(n=3208)。大多数患者(96.7%)接受低剂量非增强方案检查。根据 C-RADS 分类,前瞻性评估最相关的 ECF 和结直肠病变(≥6mm)。随访根据电子病历回顾进行。采用卡方检验评估相关发现与症状、年龄和性别之间的关系。

结果

共有 270 例(8.4%)患者被分类为 C-RADS E3,63 例(2.0%)患者被分类为 C-RADS E4,437 例(13.6%)患者评估为结直肠病变(C-RADS C2-4)。在随访中,三分之二的 ECF 结果为恶性肿瘤或需要进一步医学关注的相关疾病。ECF 的比例与特定的结直肠症状无关。年龄≥65 岁的患者和男性比年轻患者(C-RADS E3 p=0.005;C-RADS E4 p<0.001)和女性(C-RADS E3 p=0.013;C-RADS E4 p=0.009)的 ECF 比例更高。

结论

在有症状的低危患者中,相关的 ECF 和结直肠病变的比例相对较低。通过使用 CTC 作为单一检查,特别是在老年患者中,大多数结肠镜检查可以避免,同时可以诊断出相关的 ECF,而不会引入实质性的过度诊断。

相似文献

1
Detection of potentially relevant extracolonic and colorectal findings at CT colonography in a low-risk symptomatic patient population.在低危症状患者人群的 CT 结肠成像中检测潜在相关的结外和结直肠发现。
Abdom Radiol (NY). 2017 Dec;42(12):2799-2806. doi: 10.1007/s00261-017-1221-5.
2
Extracolonic findings (ECF) on CT colonography (CTC) in patients presenting with colorectal symptoms.有结直肠症状患者的CT结肠成像(CTC)检查中的结肠外表现(ECF)。
Acta Radiol. 2013 Oct;54(8):851-62. doi: 10.1177/0284185113486371. Epub 2013 May 12.
3
Indeterminate but Likely Unimportant Extracolonic Findings at Screening CT Colonography (C-RADS Category E3): Incidence and Outcomes Data From a Clinical Screening Program.筛查CT结肠成像中不确定但可能不重要的结肠外发现(C-RADS E3类):来自一项临床筛查项目的发病率和结局数据
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2016 Nov;207(5):996-1001. doi: 10.2214/AJR.16.16275. Epub 2016 Aug 9.
4
JOURNAL CLUB: Extracolonic Findings at CT Colonography: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.期刊俱乐部:CT 结肠成像中的结外表现:系统评价和荟萃分析。
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2018 Jul;211(1):25-39. doi: 10.2214/AJR.17.19495. Epub 2018 May 24.
5
Potentially Important Extracolonic Findings at Screening CT Colonography: Incidence and Outcomes Data From a Clinical Screening Program.筛查CT结肠成像中潜在重要的结肠外发现:来自一项临床筛查项目的发病率和结局数据。
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2016 Feb;206(2):313-8. doi: 10.2214/AJR.15.15193. Epub 2015 Oct 22.
6
The yield and patient factors associated with CT colonography C-RADS results in a non-screening patient population.非筛查人群中 CT 结肠成像 C-RADS 结果与产量和患者因素相关。
Abdom Radiol (NY). 2019 Sep;44(9):2971-2977. doi: 10.1007/s00261-019-02099-9.
7
CT colonography screening in extracolonic cancer survivors: impact on rates of colorectal and extracolonic findings by cancer type.CT 结肠成像筛查结外癌幸存者:不同癌症类型对结直肠和结外发现率的影响。
Abdom Radiol (NY). 2019 Jan;44(1):31-40. doi: 10.1007/s00261-018-1708-8.
8
CT Colonography Reporting and Data System (C-RADS): benchmark values from a clinical screening program.CT 结肠成像报告和数据系统(C-RADS):来自临床筛查项目的基准值。
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2014 Jun;202(6):1232-7. doi: 10.2214/AJR.13.11272.
9
Comparison of extracolonic findings and clinical outcomes in a screening and diagnostic CT colonography population.筛查和诊断性 CT 结肠成像人群的结外表现和临床结局比较。
Abdom Radiol (NY). 2019 Feb;44(2):429-437. doi: 10.1007/s00261-018-1753-3.
10
Diagnostic value of computed tomography colonography (CTC) after incomplete optical colonoscopy.CT 结肠成像(CTC)在不完全性光学结肠镜检查后的诊断价值。
Int J Surg. 2016 Sep;33 Suppl 1:S36-44. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2016.05.053. Epub 2016 May 30.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of extracolonic findings and clinical outcomes in a screening and diagnostic CT colonography population.筛查和诊断性 CT 结肠成像人群的结外表现和临床结局比较。
Abdom Radiol (NY). 2019 Feb;44(2):429-437. doi: 10.1007/s00261-018-1753-3.