Suppr超能文献

脊柱关节炎患者足跟附着点的超声评估:与磁共振成像和传统X线摄影的对比研究

Ultrasonography assessment of heel entheses in patients with spondyloarthritis: a comparative study with magnetic resonance imaging and conventional radiography.

作者信息

Aguila Maldonado Rodrigo, Ruta Santiago, Valuntas María Laura, García Mercedes

机构信息

Servicio de Reumatología, Hospital "Gral. San Martín" de La Plata, Calle 1 y 70 (1900), La Plata, Buenos Aires, Argentina.

Seccion Reumatología, Servicio Clínica Médica, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, La Plata, Argentina.

出版信息

Clin Rheumatol. 2017 Aug;36(8):1811-1817. doi: 10.1007/s10067-017-3723-5. Epub 2017 Jun 25.

Abstract

The aim of the present study was to determine the agreement between ultrasonography (US), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and conventional radiography (CR) in the detection of findings indicative of enthesopathy in spondyloarthritis (SpA) patients. A cross-sectional study was performed in 40 SpA patients. Heel entheses (Achilles tendon and plantar fascia) were bilaterally examined by US, MRI, and CR. The three imaging modalities were carried out by three independent operators blinded to the other imaging modality data. Soft tissue abnormalities indicative of enthesopathy as thickening, structural changes, and bursitis were assessed by both US and MRI, and cortical bone abnormalities indicative of enthesopathy as erosions and enthesophytes were assessed by the three imaging modalities. The unweighted kappa values between US and MRI were 0.80, 0.66, 0.69, 0.70, and 0.70 for thickening, structural changes, bursitis, enthesophytes, and bone erosions, respectively. With respect to the detection of enthesophytes, the unweighted kappa values between CR and both US and MRI were 0.78 and 0.76, respectively. At last, for the recognition of bone erosions, the unweighted kappa values between CR and both US and MRI were 0.38 and 0.45, respectively. Using MRI as standard reference method, US was more sensitive with respect to CR revealing bone erosions. The present study provides evidence about the high overall agreement between US and MRI for all abnormal comparable findings at entheseal level and between US, MRI, and CR for the detection of enthesophytes in SpA patients.

摘要

本研究的目的是确定超声检查(US)、磁共振成像(MRI)和传统X线摄影(CR)在检测脊柱关节炎(SpA)患者中提示附着点病的表现方面的一致性。对40例SpA患者进行了一项横断面研究。通过US、MRI和CR对双侧足跟附着点(跟腱和足底筋膜)进行检查。这三种成像方式由三名独立的操作人员进行,他们对其他成像方式的数据不知情。US和MRI评估提示附着点病的软组织异常,如增厚、结构改变和滑囊炎,而三种成像方式评估提示附着点病的皮质骨异常,如侵蚀和骨赘。US和MRI之间关于增厚、结构改变、滑囊炎、骨赘和骨侵蚀的未加权kappa值分别为0.80、0.66、0.69、0.70和0.70。关于骨赘的检测,CR与US和MRI之间的未加权kappa值分别为0.78和0.76。最后,对于骨侵蚀的识别,CR与US和MRI之间的未加权kappa值分别为0.38和0.45。以MRI作为标准参考方法,在显示骨侵蚀方面,US比CR更敏感。本研究为US和MRI在附着点水平上所有异常可比表现之间的高度总体一致性以及US、MRI和CR在SpA患者骨赘检测方面的一致性提供了证据。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验