Suppr超能文献

[预防性化疗对40岁以上侵蚀性葡萄胎患者结局及预后的影响]

[Effects of prophylactic chemotherapy on outcomes and prognosis of patients older than 40 years with invasive mole].

作者信息

Jiang S Y, Li L, Zhao J, Xiang Y, Wan X R, Feng F Z, Ren T, Yang J J

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing 100730, China.

出版信息

Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2017 Jun 25;52(6):398-402. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0529-567X.2017.06.008.

Abstract

To discuss the effects of prophylactic chemotherapy on the outcomes and prognosis of invasive mole patients. One hundred and fifteen invasive mole (IM) patients older than 40 years were registered in Peking Union Medical Collage Hospital.Eleven of them were treated with prophylactic chemotherapy before diagnosed as IM prophylactic chemotherapy group, while the other 104 cases received therapeutic chemotherapy after diagnosed as IM (non-prophylactic chemotherapy group). The general clinical data (including age, clinical stage, risk factor score), treatment, outcomes and relapse of patients were retrospectively compared between two groups. (1) The age of prophylactic chemotherapy group and non-prophylactic chemotherapy group were (47±5) versus (46±4) years old. Ratio of clinical stageⅠ-Ⅱ were 3/11 versus 29.8% (31/104), clinical stage Ⅲ-Ⅳ were 8/11 versus 70.2% (73/104). Ratio of risk factor score 0-6 were 11/11 versus 84.6% (88/104), risk factor score >6 were 0 versus 15.4% (16/104). There were no significant statistical differences between two groups in age, clinical stage or risk factor score (all 0.05). (2) Treatment: the total chemotherapy courses between prophylactic chemotherapy group and non-prophylactic chemotherapy group (median 7 versus 5) were significantly different (3.071,0.002). There were no significant statistical differences between two groups in the chemotherapy courses until negative conversion of β-hCG, consolidation chemotherapy courses, total therapeutic chemotherapy courses or ratio of hysterectomy (all 0.05). (3) Outcomes and relapse: between the prophylactic chemotherapy group and the non-prophylactic chemotherapy group, the complete remission rate were 11/11 versus 98.1%(102/104), the relapse rate were 0 versus 1.0%(1/102). There were no significant difference between the two groups in outcomes or relapse rate (0.05). Prophylactic chemotherapy does not substantially benefit the IM patients older than 40 years. Prophylactic chemotherapy may not significantly improve patients' prognosis, in which increased sample size is required in further study.

摘要

探讨预防性化疗对侵蚀性葡萄胎患者结局及预后的影响。北京协和医院登记了115例年龄大于40岁的侵蚀性葡萄胎(IM)患者。其中11例在诊断为IM之前接受预防性化疗(预防性化疗组),另外104例在诊断为IM之后接受治疗性化疗(非预防性化疗组)。对两组患者的一般临床资料(包括年龄、临床分期、危险因素评分)、治疗情况、结局及复发情况进行回顾性比较。(1)预防性化疗组和非预防性化疗组的年龄分别为(47±5)岁和(46±4)岁。临床Ⅰ - Ⅱ期的比例分别为3/11和29.8%(31/104),临床Ⅲ - Ⅳ期的比例分别为8/11和70.2%(73/104)。危险因素评分0 - 6分的比例分别为11/11和84.6%(88/104),危险因素评分>6分的比例分别为0和15.4%(16/104)。两组在年龄、临床分期或危险因素评分方面均无显著统计学差异(均P>0.05)。(2)治疗:预防性化疗组和非预防性化疗组的总化疗疗程(中位数分别为7和5)有显著差异(3.071,0.002)。两组在β - hCG转阴前的化疗疗程、巩固化疗疗程、总治疗性化疗疗程或子宫切除比例方面均无显著统计学差异(均P>0.05)。(3)结局及复发:预防性化疗组和非预防性化疗组的完全缓解率分别为11/11和98.1%(102/104),复发率分别为0和1.0%(1/102)。两组在结局或复发率方面无显著差异(P>0.05)。预防性化疗对年龄大于40岁的IM患者无显著益处。预防性化疗可能不会显著改善患者预后,进一步研究需要增加样本量。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验