• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

社交焦虑与工作状态:消极元认知信念、症状严重程度及认知行为因素的作用

Social anxiety and work status: the role of negative metacognitive beliefs, symptom severity and cognitive-behavioural factors.

作者信息

Nordahl Henrik, Wells Adrian

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.

Division of Psychiatry, St. Olavs Hospital, Trondheim, Norway.

出版信息

J Ment Health. 2020 Dec;29(6):665-669. doi: 10.1080/09638237.2017.1340622. Epub 2017 Jun 24.

DOI:10.1080/09638237.2017.1340622
PMID:28648099
Abstract

: Psychological health has a profound effect on personal and occupational functioning with Social Anxiety Symptoms in particular having a major effect on ability to work. Recent initiatives have focused on treating psychological illness with cognitive-behavioural models with a view to increasing return to work. However, the psychological correlates of work status amongst individuals with elevated mental health symptoms such as social anxiety are under-explored.: This study reports a test of unique predictors of work status drawing on variables that have been given centre stage in cognitive-behavioural models and in the metacognitive model of psychological disorder.: The sample consisted of high socially anxious individuals who reported to be working ( = 102) or receiving disability benefits ( = 102).: A comparison of these groups showed that those out of work and receiving benefits had greater symptom severity, higher avoidance and use of safety behaviours, greater self-consciousness, and elevated negative metacognitive beliefs and beliefs about the need to control thoughts. However, when the covariance's between these variables were controlled, only negative metacognitive beliefs significantly predicted out-of-work status.: Our finding might be important because CBT does not focus on metacognitive beliefs, but targets components that in our analysis had no unique predictive value for work status.

摘要

心理健康对个人和职业功能有着深远影响,尤其是社交焦虑症状对工作能力有重大影响。最近的举措集中在运用认知行为模型治疗心理疾病,以期提高重返工作岗位的几率。然而,对于心理健康症状(如社交焦虑)较为严重的个体,其工作状态的心理相关因素尚未得到充分研究。

本研究报告了一项对工作状态独特预测因素的测试,该测试利用了在认知行为模型和心理障碍元认知模型中占据核心地位的变量。

样本由自称正在工作(n = 102)或领取残疾福利(n = 102)的高度社交焦虑个体组成。

对这些群体的比较表明,失业且领取福利的个体症状严重程度更高、回避和使用安全行为的情况更多、自我意识更强,消极元认知信念以及关于控制思维必要性的信念也更高。然而,当控制这些变量之间的协方差时,只有消极元认知信念能显著预测失业状态。

我们的发现可能很重要,因为认知行为疗法并不关注元认知信念,而是针对在我们的分析中对工作状态没有独特预测价值的成分。

相似文献

1
Social anxiety and work status: the role of negative metacognitive beliefs, symptom severity and cognitive-behavioural factors.社交焦虑与工作状态:消极元认知信念、症状严重程度及认知行为因素的作用
J Ment Health. 2020 Dec;29(6):665-669. doi: 10.1080/09638237.2017.1340622. Epub 2017 Jun 24.
2
Insight across mental disorders: A multifaceted metacognitive phenomenon.洞察精神障碍:一种多方面的元认知现象。
Psychiatriki. 2019 Jan-Mar;30(1):13-16. doi: 10.22365/jpsych.2019.301.13.
3
Cognitive and metacognitive predictors of symptom improvement following treatment for social anxiety disorder: A secondary analysis from a randomized controlled trial.认知和元认知预测因素对社交焦虑障碍治疗后症状改善的影响:一项随机对照试验的二次分析。
Clin Psychol Psychother. 2017 Nov;24(6):1221-1227. doi: 10.1002/cpp.2083. Epub 2017 Mar 15.
4
The evaluation of metacognitive beliefs and emotion recognition in panic disorder and generalized anxiety disorder: effects on symptoms and comparison with healthy control.惊恐障碍和广泛性焦虑障碍中元认知信念与情绪识别的评估:对症状的影响及与健康对照的比较
Nord J Psychiatry. 2019 May-Jul;73(4-5):293-301. doi: 10.1080/08039488.2019.1623317. Epub 2019 Jun 3.
5
Metacognitive beliefs and their relationship with anxiety and depression in physical illnesses: A systematic review.认知信念及其与躯体疾病中焦虑和抑郁的关系:系统评价。
PLoS One. 2020 Sep 10;15(9):e0238457. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0238457. eCollection 2020.
6
The relationship between negative metacognitive thoughts, pain catastrophizing and adjustment to chronic pain.消极元认知思维、疼痛灾难化与慢性疼痛适应之间的关系。
Eur J Pain. 2018 Apr;22(4):756-762. doi: 10.1002/ejp.1160. Epub 2017 Dec 7.
7
Metacognition, cognition and social anxiety: A test of temporal and reciprocal relationships.元认知、认知与社交焦虑:时间及相互关系的检验
J Anxiety Disord. 2022 Mar;86:102516. doi: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2021.102516. Epub 2021 Dec 24.
8
Testing the metacognitive model against the benchmark CBT model of social anxiety disorder: Is it time to move beyond cognition?对照社交焦虑障碍的基准认知行为疗法模型检验元认知模型:是时候超越认知了吗?
PLoS One. 2017 May 4;12(5):e0177109. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0177109. eCollection 2017.
9
The relationship between metacognitive beliefs and symptoms in eating disorders.元认知信念与进食障碍症状之间的关系。
Psychiatriki. 2020 Jul-Sep;31(3):225-235. doi: 10.22365/jpsych.2020.313.225.
10
Social cognition and metacognition in social anxiety: A systematic review.社交焦虑中的社会认知和元认知:系统综述。
Clin Psychol Psychother. 2018 Jan;25(1):10-30. doi: 10.1002/cpp.2127. Epub 2017 Aug 24.

引用本文的文献

1
Social anxiety in young people: A prevalence study in seven countries.年轻人的社交焦虑:七个国家的患病率研究。
PLoS One. 2020 Sep 17;15(9):e0239133. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0239133. eCollection 2020.
2
Metacognitive Beliefs as Predictors of Return to Work After Intensive Return-to-Work Rehabilitation in Patients With Chronic Pain, Chronic Fatigue and Common Psychological Disorders: Results From a Prospective Trial.元认知信念对慢性疼痛、慢性疲劳及常见心理障碍患者强化重返工作岗位康复后重返工作的预测作用:一项前瞻性试验的结果
Front Psychol. 2020 Feb 6;11:70. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00070. eCollection 2020.
3
Metacognition, Hardiness, and Grit as Resilience Factors in Unmanned Aerial Systems (UAS) Operations: A Simulation Study.
元认知、心理韧性和坚毅作为无人机系统(UAS)操作中的复原力因素:一项模拟研究。
Front Psychol. 2019 Mar 26;10:640. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00640. eCollection 2019.
4
Metacognitive Therapy for Social Anxiety Disorder: An A-B Replication Series Across Social Anxiety Subtypes.社交焦虑障碍的元认知疗法:跨社交焦虑亚型的A - B复制系列研究
Front Psychol. 2018 Apr 12;9:540. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00540. eCollection 2018.