The University of New South Wales, Australia.
Sunshine Coast University Hospital, Australia; The University of Queensland, Australia.
Health (London). 2018 Sep;22(5):500-518. doi: 10.1177/1363459317715775. Epub 2017 Jun 24.
Antibiotic resistance poses a significant global threat, yet clinically inappropriate antibiotic use within hospitals continues despite the implementation of abatement strategies. Antibiotic use and the viability of existing antibiotic options now sit precariously at the nexus of political will, institutional governance and clinical priorities 'at the bedside'. Yet no study has hitherto explored the perspectives of managers, instead of focusing on clinicians. In this article, drawing on qualitative interviews with hospital managers, we explore accounts of responding to antimicrobial resistance, managing antibiotic governance and negotiating clinical and managerial priorities. We argue that the managers' accounts articulate the problematic nexus of measurement and accountability, the downflow effects of political will, and core tensions within the hospital between moral, managerial and medical authority. We apply Bourdieu's theory of practice to argue that an understanding of the logics of practice within the 'hospital management classes' will be critical in efforts to protect antibiotics for future generations.
抗生素耐药性构成了重大的全球威胁,但尽管采取了减少策略,医院内临床不合理使用抗生素的情况仍在持续。抗生素的使用和现有抗生素选择的可行性现在处于政治意愿、机构治理和临床优先事项的“床边”的交叉点。然而,迄今为止,还没有研究探讨管理者的观点,而不是关注临床医生。在本文中,我们借鉴了对医院管理者的定性访谈,探讨了他们应对抗微生物药物耐药性、管理抗生素治理以及协商临床和管理优先事项的说法。我们认为,管理者的说法阐明了衡量和问责制的问题症结、政治意愿的下行影响,以及医院内部在道德、管理和医疗权威之间的核心紧张关系。我们运用布迪厄的实践理论来论证,理解“医院管理阶层”内部实践的逻辑对于保护未来几代人的抗生素至关重要。