Bildirici Ulas, Aktas Mujdat, Dervis Emir, Celikyurt Umut
Department of Cardiology, Kocaeli University, Medical Faculty, Kocaeli, Turkey.
Department of Cardiology, Eregli State Hospital, Zonguldak, Turkey.
Med Sci Monit. 2017 Jun 26;23:3130-3135. doi: 10.12659/msm.902413.
BACKGROUND Superficial femoral artery chronic total occlusion (SCTO) is a common type of peripheral arterial disease (PAD). Endovascular therapy is a treatment approach that has a poor long-term success rate in this group. The aim of this study was to compare the mid-term results of two different uses of nitinol stents in long SCTO lesions (>100 mm): the use of one long stent or two shorter stents. MATERIAL AND METHODS Of 154 patients who underwent percutaneous infrainguinal interventions from 2011 to 2014, a total of 170 CTO lesions were selected for this retrospective study analysis. The mean age of the study population was 63.4±10.4 years (range 29-89 years); 71.8% of the patients were male. RESULTS Patients were divided into two groups according to the number of stents used. Patients treated with a single stent were placed into group A and patients treated with two stents were placed into group B. The stent fracture rate was significantly higher in group B compared to group A (29.2% vs. 42%). Type 1 and 2 fracture rates were higher in group A, but type 3 and 5 fracture rates were significantly higher in group B. The rate of stent restenosis was significantly higher in group B compared to group A (45.1% vs. 54.5%, p=0.05). CONCLUSIONS Mid-term patency rate was low in patients with long totally occluded superficial femoral artery (SFA) lesions. Using a long single stent had an acceptable mid-term patency rate compared to using a two stent strategy. Stent fracture seemed to be the main reason for in-stent restenosis in cases of multiple stenting. A long single stent strategy may be more appropriate and reasonable than a two stent strategy in the treatment of long SFA lesions.
背景 股浅动脉慢性完全闭塞(SCTO)是外周动脉疾病(PAD)的一种常见类型。血管内治疗是该组患者长期成功率较低的一种治疗方法。本研究的目的是比较两种不同方式使用镍钛诺支架治疗长段SCTO病变(>100mm)的中期结果:使用一个长支架或两个短支架。材料与方法 对2011年至2014年接受经皮股动脉以下介入治疗的154例患者,共选择170例CTO病变进行这项回顾性研究分析。研究人群的平均年龄为63.4±10.4岁(范围29 - 89岁);71.8%的患者为男性。结果 根据使用的支架数量将患者分为两组。接受单个支架治疗的患者归入A组,接受两个支架治疗的患者归入B组。B组的支架断裂率显著高于A组(29.2%对42%)。A组1型和2型断裂率较高,但B组3型和5型断裂率显著更高。B组的支架再狭窄率显著高于A组(45.1%对54.5%,p = 0.05)。结论 长段股浅动脉(SFA)完全闭塞病变患者的中期通畅率较低。与使用两个支架的策略相比,使用单个长支架具有可接受的中期通畅率。在多支架置入病例中,支架断裂似乎是支架内再狭窄的主要原因。在治疗长段SFA病变时,单个长支架策略可能比两个支架策略更合适、更合理。