Segel Joel E, Balkrishnan Rajesh, Hirth Richard A
*Department of Health Policy and Administration, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA †Penn State Cancer Institute, Hershey, PA ‡Department of Public Health Sciences and Emily Couric Cancer Center, School of Medicine, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA §Department of Health Management and Policy, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.
Med Care. 2017 Aug;55(8):752-758. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000000760.
Despite reported increases in anxiety following a false-positive mammogram, there is little evidence the effect rises to the clinical level of initiating medication.
To analyze the effect of a false-positive mammogram on antidepressant or anxiolytic initiation and identify subpopulations most at risk.
MarketScan commercial and Medicaid claims databases used to identify women ages 40-64 undergoing screening mammography with no prior antidepressant or anxiolytic claims.
Using a retrospective cohort design, we estimated the effects of a false-positive relative to a negative mammogram on the likelihood of initiating antidepressants or anxiolytics using multivariate logistic models estimated separately by insurance type.
At 3 months after a false-positive mammogram, the relative risk (RR) for antidepressant or anxiolytic initiation was 1.19 [95% confidence interval (CI), 1.06-1.31] for the commercially insured and 1.13 (95% CI, 0.96-1.29) in the Medicaid population. In addition, 4 subgroups were at particularly elevated risk: commercially insured women ages 40-49 (RR=1.33; 95% CI, 1.13-1.54) or whose false-positive required multiple tests to resolve (RR=1.37; 95% CI, 1.17-1.57), included a biopsy (RR=1.68; 95% CI, 1.18-2.17), or whose resolution took >1 week (RR=1.21; 95% CI, 1.07-1.34).
False-positive mammograms were associated with significant increases in antidepressant or anxiolytic imitation among the commercially insured. Follow-up resources may be particularly beneficial for cases taking longer to resolve and involving biopsies or multiple tests. The results highlight the need to resolve false-positives quickly and effectively and to monitor depressive symptoms following a positive result.
尽管有报道称乳腺钼靶检查结果为假阳性后焦虑情绪会增加,但几乎没有证据表明这种影响会上升到需要开始用药的临床水平。
分析乳腺钼靶检查结果为假阳性对抗抑郁药或抗焦虑药使用起始的影响,并确定风险最高的亚人群。
使用MarketScan商业保险和医疗补助索赔数据库来识别40 - 64岁接受乳腺钼靶筛查且之前没有抗抑郁药或抗焦虑药索赔记录的女性。
采用回顾性队列设计,我们使用按保险类型分别估计的多变量逻辑模型,估计了与乳腺钼靶检查结果为阴性相比,假阳性对开始使用抗抑郁药或抗焦虑药可能性的影响。
在乳腺钼靶检查结果为假阳性后的3个月,商业保险人群中开始使用抗抑郁药或抗焦虑药的相对风险(RR)为1.19 [95%置信区间(CI),1.06 - 1.31],医疗补助人群中为1.13(95% CI,0.96 - 1.29)。此外,有4个亚组的风险特别高:40 - 49岁的商业保险女性(RR = 1.33;95% CI,1.13 - 1.54),或其假阳性结果需要多次检查才能解决的女性(RR = 1.37;95% CI,1.17 - 1.57),包括接受活检的女性(RR = 1.68;95% CI,1.18 - 2.17),或其结果解决时间超过1周的女性(RR = 1.21;95% CI,1.07 - 1.34)。
乳腺钼靶检查结果为假阳性与商业保险人群中抗抑郁药或抗焦虑药使用起始的显著增加有关。对于解决时间较长且涉及活检或多次检查的病例,后续资源可能特别有益。结果强调了快速有效地解决假阳性结果以及在结果为阳性后监测抑郁症状的必要性。