Thijssen H H, Baars L G, Drittij-Reijnders M J
Drug Metab Dispos. 1985 Sep-Oct;13(5):593-7.
The stereoselectivity of the pharmacokinetics and of the pharmacodynamics of the oral anticoagulant acenocoumarol (AC) and of two of its potential metabolites, the amino (AM) and the acetamido (AA) derivatives, were investigated in the rat. The pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics were investigated following the acute subcutaneous (1 mg/kg) administration of the pure enantiomers. For AC and AA, the S(-)-enantiomer was preferentially eliminated, whereas for AM the R(+)-enantiomer showed the shortest half-life. The differences in elimination between the AC enantiomers were entirely due to differences in total clearance, 183 +/- 14 and 714 +/- 148 ml X h-1 X kg-1 (+/- SD) for R(+)- and S(-)-AC. Also the differences in elimination between the AM enantiomers were mainly due to differences in body clearance, 50 +/- 13 and 18 +/- 4 ml X h-1 X kg-1 for R(+)- and S(-)-AM. For S(-)-AA the higher total clearance as well as the smaller volume of distribution accounted for its 2-fold higher rate of elimination. Acetylation of AM, i.e. the conversion to AA, which accounted for about 50% of its total clearance was stereoselective for R(+)-AM. The renal clearance of AA which accounted for 50-60% of the AA clearance was not selective for one of the AA enantiomers. Stereoselectivity in plasma protein binding was observed, the differences, however, were small. Thus, stereoselectivity in plasma protein binding did not account for the observed differences in the pharmacokinetics. The differences in anticlotting activity between the enantiomers of AC and AM were determined mainly by their pharmacokinetics.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
在大鼠体内研究了口服抗凝药醋硝香豆素(AC)及其两种潜在代谢产物氨基(AM)和乙酰氨基(AA)衍生物的药代动力学和药效学的立体选择性。在急性皮下注射(1mg/kg)纯对映体后研究了药代动力学和药效学。对于AC和AA,S(-)-对映体优先被消除,而对于AM,R(+)-对映体的半衰期最短。AC对映体之间消除的差异完全归因于总清除率的差异,R(+)-和S(-)-AC的总清除率分别为183±14和714±148ml·h⁻¹·kg⁻¹(±标准差)。AM对映体之间消除的差异也主要归因于机体清除率的差异,R(+)-和S(-)-AM的机体清除率分别为50±13和18±4ml·h⁻¹·kg⁻¹。对于S(-)-AA,较高的总清除率以及较小的分布容积导致其消除速率高2倍。AM的乙酰化,即转化为AA,约占其总清除率的50%,对R(+)-AM具有立体选择性。占AA清除率50 - 60%的AA肾清除率对AA的一种对映体没有选择性。观察到血浆蛋白结合存在立体选择性,但差异较小。因此,血浆蛋白结合的立体选择性不能解释药代动力学中观察到的差异。AC和AM对映体之间抗凝血活性的差异主要由其药代动力学决定。(摘要截短于250字)