• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在常规临床实践中使用可重新定位和完全可回收的主动脉瓣的安全性和有效性:RESPOND 研究。

Safety and efficacy of a repositionable and fully retrievable aortic valve used in routine clinical practice: the RESPOND Study.

机构信息

Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, Deutsches Herzzentrum Berlin (DZHB), Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353 Berlin, Germany.

Department for Cardiovascular Surgery, Charité Berlin, Chariteplatz 1, 10117 Berlin, Germany.

出版信息

Eur Heart J. 2017 Dec 1;38(45):3359-3366. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehx297.

DOI:10.1093/eurheartj/ehx297
PMID:28651336
Abstract

AIMS

RESPOND is a prospective, open-label, single-arm study evaluating the outcomes following transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) with the repositionable and fully retrievable Lotus Valve used in routine clinical practice for the treatment of patients with aortic valve stenosis.

METHODS AND RESULTS

RESPOND enrolled 1014 patients at sites across Europe, New Zealand, and Latin America; 996 patients received a Lotus Valve (mean age: 80.8 years; 50.8% female; Society of Thoracic Surgeons score: 6.0 ± 6.9). Repositioning was attempted in 29.2% of patients, with 99% success. The rate of all-cause mortality in the intent-to-treat population at 30 days (primary endpoint) was 2.6% (P < 0.001 vs. pre-specified performance goal). Thirty-day clinical follow-up was completed for 97.3% of patients. Among patients who received a Lotus Valve, the 30-day overall and disabling stroke rates were 3.0% and 2.2%, respectively. The 30-day permanent pacemaker implantation rate was 30.0% in all patients, and 34.6% in pacemaker-naïve patients. Echocardiographic data at baseline and pre-discharge were assessed by an independent core laboratory. Mean aortic valve gradient declined from 37.7 ± 15.2 mmHg at baseline to 10.8 ± 4.6 mmHg at hospital discharge (P < 0.001). Aortic valve area increased from 0.7 ± 0.2 cm2 at baseline to 1.8 ± 0.4 cm2 at discharge (P < 0.001). At hospital discharge, paravalvular leak (PVL) was absent or trace in 92% of patients; no patients had severe PVL, 0.3% of patients exhibited moderate PVL, and 7.7% of patients had mild PVL. Clinical follow-up in RESPOND will extend to 5 years.

CONCLUSION

The results of RESPOND confirm the safety and efficacy of TAVI with the Lotus Valve in routine clinical practice.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov #NCT 02031302.

摘要

目的

RESPOND 是一项前瞻性、开放标签、单臂研究,评估了在常规临床实践中使用可重定位和完全可回收的 Lotus 瓣膜进行经导管主动脉瓣置换术(TAVI)后的结果,用于治疗主动脉瓣狭窄患者。

方法和结果

RESPOND 在欧洲、新西兰和拉丁美洲的多个地点招募了 1014 名患者;996 名患者接受了 Lotus 瓣膜治疗(平均年龄:80.8 岁;50.8%为女性;胸外科医生协会评分:6.0±6.9)。在 29.2%的患者中尝试了重新定位,成功率为 99%。意向治疗人群在 30 天(主要终点)的全因死亡率为 2.6%(P<0.001 与预先指定的性能目标相比)。97.3%的患者完成了 30 天的临床随访。在接受 Lotus 瓣膜治疗的患者中,30 天的总卒中发生率和致残性卒中发生率分别为 3.0%和 2.2%。所有患者的 30 天永久性起搏器植入率为 30.0%,起搏器初治患者为 34.6%。基线和出院前的超声心动图数据由独立的核心实验室评估。平均主动脉瓣跨瓣压差从基线时的 37.7±15.2mmHg 降至出院时的 10.8±4.6mmHg(P<0.001)。主动脉瓣面积从基线时的 0.7±0.2cm2增加至出院时的 1.8±0.4cm2(P<0.001)。出院时,92%的患者无或微量瓣周漏;无患者发生严重瓣周漏,0.3%的患者发生中度瓣周漏,7.7%的患者发生轻度瓣周漏。RESPOND 的临床随访将延长至 5 年。

结论

RESPOND 的结果证实了在常规临床实践中使用 Lotus 瓣膜进行 TAVI 的安全性和有效性。

试验注册

ClinicalTrials.gov #NCT 02031302。

相似文献

1
Safety and efficacy of a repositionable and fully retrievable aortic valve used in routine clinical practice: the RESPOND Study.在常规临床实践中使用可重新定位和完全可回收的主动脉瓣的安全性和有效性:RESPOND 研究。
Eur Heart J. 2017 Dec 1;38(45):3359-3366. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehx297.
2
Use of a Repositionable and Fully Retrievable Aortic Valve in Routine Clinical Practice: The RESPOND Study and RESPOND Extension Cohort.在常规临床实践中使用可重定位和完全可回收的主动脉瓣:RESPOND 研究和 RESPOND 扩展队列。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 Jan 14;12(1):38-49. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2018.10.052.
3
Clinical outcomes of the Lotus Valve in patients with bicuspid aortic valve stenosis: An analysis from the RESPOND study.莲花瓣治疗二叶式主动脉瓣狭窄患者的临床结局:来自RESPOND研究的分析
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 May 1;93(6):1116-1123. doi: 10.1002/ccd.28120. Epub 2019 Feb 17.
4
1-Year Outcomes With the Fully Repositionable and Retrievable Lotus Transcatheter Aortic Replacement Valve in 120 High-Risk Surgical Patients With Severe Aortic Stenosis: Results of the REPRISE II Study.120例严重主动脉瓣狭窄高危手术患者使用可完全重新定位和回收的Lotus经导管主动脉瓣置换瓣膜的1年结局:REPRISE II研究结果
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2016 Feb 22;9(4):376-384. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2015.10.024.
5
Outcome With the Repositionable and Retrievable Boston Scientific Lotus Valve Compared With the Balloon-Expandable Edwards Sapien 3 Valve in Patients Undergoing Transfemoral Aortic Valve Replacement.可重定位和可回收 Boston Scientific Lotus 瓣膜与经股主动脉瓣置换术患者中球囊扩张型 Edwards Sapien 3 瓣膜的结局比较。
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2017 Jun;10(6). doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.116.004670.
6
Single-center evaluation of a next generation fully repositionable and retrievable transcatheter aortic valve replacement.单中心评估新一代完全可重新定位和可回收经导管主动脉瓣置换术。
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2019 Feb 26;19(1):44. doi: 10.1186/s12872-019-1021-7.
7
A comparison of the fully repositionable and retrievable Boston Lotus and direct flow medical valves for the treatment of severe aortic stenosis: A single center experience.用于治疗严重主动脉瓣狭窄的完全可重新定位和可回收的波士顿莲花瓣膜与直流通医疗瓣膜的比较:单中心经验。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 Apr 1;91(5):966-974. doi: 10.1002/ccd.27319. Epub 2017 Sep 20.
8
Procedural and 30-day clinical outcomes following transcatheter aortic valve replacement with lotus valve: Results of the RELEVANT study.经导管植入莲花瓣膜进行主动脉瓣置换术后的操作及30天临床结果:相关研究结果
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2017 Dec 1;90(7):1206-1211. doi: 10.1002/ccd.26914. Epub 2017 Feb 1.
9
Predictors of Paravalvular Regurgitation After Implantation of the Fully Repositionable and Retrievable Lotus Transcatheter Aortic Valve (from the REPRISE II Trial Extended Cohort).完全可重新定位和可回收的莲花经导管主动脉瓣植入术后瓣周反流的预测因素(来自REPRISE II试验扩展队列)
Am J Cardiol. 2017 Jul 15;120(2):292-299. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2017.04.026. Epub 2017 Apr 27.
10
Two-Year Outcomes After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement With Mechanical vs Self-expanding Valves: The REPRISE III Randomized Clinical Trial.经导管主动脉瓣置换术使用机械瓣与自膨瓣的两年结果:REPRISE III 随机临床试验。
JAMA Cardiol. 2019 Mar 1;4(3):223-229. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2019.0091.

引用本文的文献

1
Quantitative Angiographic Assessment of Aortic Regurgitation Following 11 TAVR Devices: An Update of a Multicenter Pooled Analysis.11种经导管主动脉瓣置换术(TAVR)装置术后主动脉瓣反流的定量血管造影评估:多中心汇总分析的更新
J Soc Cardiovasc Angiogr Interv. 2022 Apr 14;1(3):100037. doi: 10.1016/j.jscai.2022.100037. eCollection 2022 May-Jun.
2
Cusp-overlap view reduces conduction disturbances and permanent pacemaker implantation after transcatheter aortic valve replacement even with balloon-expandable and mechanically-expandable heart valves.瓣叶重叠视图可减少经导管主动脉瓣置换术后的传导障碍和永久性起搏器植入,即使使用球囊扩张式和机械扩张式心脏瓣膜也是如此。
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2023 Dec 1;10:1269833. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2023.1269833. eCollection 2023.
3
Increased cardiovascular mortality in patients with mechanically expandable transcatheter aortic valve and without permanent pacemaker.机械可扩张经导管主动脉瓣置换术且无永久性起搏器的患者心血管死亡率增加。
Open Heart. 2023 Dec 14;10(2):e002386. doi: 10.1136/openhrt-2023-002386.
4
Safety and performance of the Vienna self-expandable transcatheter aortic valve system: 6-month results of the VIVA first-in-human feasibility study.维也纳自膨胀经导管主动脉瓣系统的安全性和性能:VIVA首次人体可行性研究的6个月结果
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2023 Jul 13;10:1199047. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2023.1199047. eCollection 2023.
5
Prosthesis Tailoring for Patients Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation.经导管主动脉瓣植入术患者的假体定制
J Clin Med. 2023 Jan 1;12(1):338. doi: 10.3390/jcm12010338.
6
Mid-term outcomes of patients with Lotus and Evolut transcatheter valves.Lotus和Evolut经导管瓣膜患者的中期结果。
Postepy Kardiol Interwencyjnej. 2022 Jun;18(2):146-153. doi: 10.5114/aic.2022.118531. Epub 2022 Aug 19.
7
Impact of left ventricular outflow tract calcification in patients undergoing transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve implantation.经股动脉经导管主动脉瓣植入术患者左心室流出道钙化的影响。
EuroIntervention. 2022 Apr 1;17(17):e1417-e1424. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-21-00464.
8
Strategies for Recovering an Embolized Percutaneous Device.取回栓塞的经皮装置的策略。
Curr Cardiol Rep. 2021 Jul 16;23(9):123. doi: 10.1007/s11886-021-01554-8.
9
Choice of transcatheter heart valve: should we select the device according to each patient's characteristics or should it be "one valve fits all"?经导管心脏瓣膜的选择:我们应该根据每位患者的特征来选择器械,还是应该采用“一种瓣膜适用于所有人”的方式?
Ann Transl Med. 2020 Aug;8(15):961. doi: 10.21037/atm.2020.04.13.
10
Insights on Embolic Protection, Repositioning, and Stroke: A Subanalysis of the RESPOND Study.栓塞保护、重新定位和卒中的见解:RESPOND 研究的亚分析。
J Interv Cardiol. 2020 May 17;2020:3070427. doi: 10.1155/2020/3070427. eCollection 2020.