• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

单中心评估新一代完全可重新定位和可回收经导管主动脉瓣置换术。

Single-center evaluation of a next generation fully repositionable and retrievable transcatheter aortic valve replacement.

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Skane University Hospital, 221-85, Lund, SE, Sweden.

出版信息

BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2019 Feb 26;19(1):44. doi: 10.1186/s12872-019-1021-7.

DOI:10.1186/s12872-019-1021-7
PMID:30808296
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6390309/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The mechanically expandable Lotus Valve System is a fully repositionable and retrievable valve with an adaptive seal to minimize paravalvular leak (PVL). The aim of this study was to evaluate the short- and long-term safety and efficacy of the new device with focus on a new implantation technique to reduce the need for a permanent pacemaker (PPM) post procedure.

METHODS

We performed a prospective single-center, non-randomized evaluation of the Lotus Valve System. The first 100 consecutive Lotus Valve implantations were included in the analysis. Outcome was assessed according to VARC2-criteria. Postoperative pacemaker rates were assessed using the national pacemaker registry and electronic medical records. Mortality at 30 days and 12 months were acquired from the national population registry.

RESULTS

Mean age was 82.7 ± 5.6 years, mean Euroscore I was 25.3 ± 14.5%, mean STS-score was 6.5 ± 4.1% and mean aortic valve area was 0.6 ± 0.1 cm. There were no cases of valve embolization, ectopic valve deployment or additional valve implantation. Device success according to the VARC2-criteria was 97%. The 30-day mortality rate was 3%. Two deaths occurred due to stroke and one due to a ventricular rupture. Major stroke rate was 2% and major vascular complication rate was 2%. The 12-month mortality rate was 14%. At discharge 87% of patients had no/trace PVL, 12% had mild PVL and one patient had a moderate PVL. A total of 13% received a new PPM post valve implantation. Among patients who did not have a PPM before the procedure, the PPM rate was 15.3%.

CONCLUSIONS

This single-center evaluation of the Lotus Valve System demonstrated a good clinical outcome with a low mortality, in a high-risk population. Introduction of a new implantation technique resulted in lower PPM rates than previously reported without negatively affecting PVL.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN14952278 , retrospectively registered 06/11/2017.

摘要

背景

机械可扩张的 Lotus 瓣膜系统是一种完全可重新定位和可回收的瓣膜,具有自适应密封功能,可最大程度减少瓣周漏(PVL)。本研究的目的是评估该新型装置的短期和长期安全性和疗效,并重点关注一种新的植入技术,以减少术后永久性起搏器(PPM)的需求。

方法

我们进行了前瞻性的单中心、非随机 Lotus 瓣膜系统评估。将前 100 例连续的 Lotus 瓣膜植入纳入分析。根据 VARC2 标准评估结果。使用国家起搏器登记处和电子病历评估术后起搏器植入率。通过国家人口登记处获得 30 天和 12 个月的死亡率。

结果

平均年龄为 82.7±5.6 岁,平均 Euroscore I 为 25.3±14.5%,平均 STS 评分 6.5±4.1%,平均主动脉瓣口面积为 0.6±0.1cm。无瓣膜栓塞、异位瓣膜展开或额外瓣膜植入的情况。根据 VARC2 标准,器械成功率为 97%。30 天死亡率为 3%。两例死亡归因于中风,一例归因于心室破裂。主要中风发生率为 2%,主要血管并发症发生率为 2%。12 个月死亡率为 14%。出院时,87%的患者无/微量瓣周漏,12%的患者有轻度瓣周漏,1 例患者有中度瓣周漏。共有 13%的患者在瓣膜植入后需要新的 PPM。在术前未植入 PPM 的患者中,PPM 发生率为 15.3%。

结论

该 Lotus 瓣膜系统的单中心评估显示,在高危人群中具有良好的临床结局,死亡率低。采用新的植入技术可降低 PPM 发生率,且不会对瓣周漏产生负面影响。

试验注册

当前对照试验 ISRCTN8561422,于 2017 年 6 月 11 日进行了回顾性注册。

相似文献

1
Single-center evaluation of a next generation fully repositionable and retrievable transcatheter aortic valve replacement.单中心评估新一代完全可重新定位和可回收经导管主动脉瓣置换术。
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2019 Feb 26;19(1):44. doi: 10.1186/s12872-019-1021-7.
2
Use of a Repositionable and Fully Retrievable Aortic Valve in Routine Clinical Practice: The RESPOND Study and RESPOND Extension Cohort.在常规临床实践中使用可重定位和完全可回收的主动脉瓣:RESPOND 研究和 RESPOND 扩展队列。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 Jan 14;12(1):38-49. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2018.10.052.
3
Outcome With the Repositionable and Retrievable Boston Scientific Lotus Valve Compared With the Balloon-Expandable Edwards Sapien 3 Valve in Patients Undergoing Transfemoral Aortic Valve Replacement.可重定位和可回收 Boston Scientific Lotus 瓣膜与经股主动脉瓣置换术患者中球囊扩张型 Edwards Sapien 3 瓣膜的结局比较。
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2017 Jun;10(6). doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.116.004670.
4
Long-term pacemaker dependency and impact of pacing on mortality following transcatheter aortic valve replacement with the LOTUS valve.经导管主动脉瓣置换术后使用 LOTUS 瓣膜后长期依赖起搏器和起搏对死亡率的影响。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 Oct 1;92(4):777-782. doi: 10.1002/ccd.27463. Epub 2018 Jan 4.
5
Procedural and 30-day clinical outcomes following transcatheter aortic valve replacement with lotus valve: Results of the RELEVANT study.经导管植入莲花瓣膜进行主动脉瓣置换术后的操作及30天临床结果:相关研究结果
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2017 Dec 1;90(7):1206-1211. doi: 10.1002/ccd.26914. Epub 2017 Feb 1.
6
A comparison of the fully repositionable and retrievable Boston Lotus and direct flow medical valves for the treatment of severe aortic stenosis: A single center experience.用于治疗严重主动脉瓣狭窄的完全可重新定位和可回收的波士顿莲花瓣膜与直流通医疗瓣膜的比较:单中心经验。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 Apr 1;91(5):966-974. doi: 10.1002/ccd.27319. Epub 2017 Sep 20.
7
Procedural and thirty-day outcomes following transfemoral implantation of the fully repositionable and retrievable Lotus valve without routine pre-dilatation in a consecutive patient cohort: a single-center experience.连续患者队列中经股动脉植入可完全重新定位和回收的Lotus瓣膜且不进行常规预扩张后的手术及30天结局:单中心经验
Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2018 Jan-Feb;19(1 Pt B):78-82. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2017.10.017. Epub 2017 Nov 4.
8
Incidence and predictors of permanent pacemaker implantation following treatment with the repositionable Lotus™ transcatheter aortic valve.可重新定位的Lotus™经导管主动脉瓣治疗后永久起搏器植入的发生率及预测因素
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2017 Jul;90(1):147-154. doi: 10.1002/ccd.26857. Epub 2016 Nov 12.
9
Importance of Contrast Aortography With Lotus Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: A Post Hoc Analysis From the RESPOND Post-Market Study.重要性的对比主动脉造影与莲花经导管主动脉瓣置换术:从 RESPOND 上市后研究的事后分析。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 Jan 22;11(2):119-128. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2017.10.016.
10
1-Year Outcomes With the Fully Repositionable and Retrievable Lotus Transcatheter Aortic Replacement Valve in 120 High-Risk Surgical Patients With Severe Aortic Stenosis: Results of the REPRISE II Study.120例严重主动脉瓣狭窄高危手术患者使用可完全重新定位和回收的Lotus经导管主动脉瓣置换瓣膜的1年结局:REPRISE II研究结果
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2016 Feb 22;9(4):376-384. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2015.10.024.

本文引用的文献

1
Safety and efficacy of a repositionable and fully retrievable aortic valve used in routine clinical practice: the RESPOND Study.在常规临床实践中使用可重新定位和完全可回收的主动脉瓣的安全性和有效性:RESPOND 研究。
Eur Heart J. 2017 Dec 1;38(45):3359-3366. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehx297.
2
Outcome With the Repositionable and Retrievable Boston Scientific Lotus Valve Compared With the Balloon-Expandable Edwards Sapien 3 Valve in Patients Undergoing Transfemoral Aortic Valve Replacement.可重定位和可回收 Boston Scientific Lotus 瓣膜与经股主动脉瓣置换术患者中球囊扩张型 Edwards Sapien 3 瓣膜的结局比较。
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2017 Jun;10(6). doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.116.004670.
3
Surgical or Transcatheter Aortic-Valve Replacement in Intermediate-Risk Patients.中危患者的外科手术或经导管主动脉瓣置换术。
N Engl J Med. 2017 Apr 6;376(14):1321-1331. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1700456. Epub 2017 Mar 17.
4
Low permanent pacemaker rates following Lotus device implantation for transcatheter aortic valve replacement due to modified implantation protocol.由于改良植入方案,经导管主动脉瓣置换术采用Lotus装置植入后永久性起搏器植入率较低。
Cardiol J. 2017;24(3):250-258. doi: 10.5603/CJ.a2017.0024. Epub 2017 Mar 1.
5
The safety of introducing a new generation TAVR device: one departments experience from introducing a second generation repositionable TAVR.引入新一代经导管主动脉瓣置换术(TAVR)设备的安全性:某科室引入第二代可重新定位TAVR的经验
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2017 Jan 13;17(1):25. doi: 10.1186/s12872-016-0466-1.
6
Transfemoral aortic valve implantation with the repositionable Lotus valve for treatment of patients with symptomatic severe aortic stenosis: results from a single-centre experience.经股动脉主动脉瓣植入可重定位 Lotus 瓣膜治疗有症状的重度主动脉瓣狭窄患者:单中心经验结果。
EuroIntervention. 2016 Aug 20;12(6):760-7. doi: 10.4244/EIJV12I6A124.
7
Transcatheter or Surgical Aortic-Valve Replacement in Intermediate-Risk Patients.经导管主动脉瓣置换术或外科主动脉瓣置换术治疗中危患者。
N Engl J Med. 2016 Apr 28;374(17):1609-20. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1514616. Epub 2016 Apr 2.
8
1-Year Outcomes With the Fully Repositionable and Retrievable Lotus Transcatheter Aortic Replacement Valve in 120 High-Risk Surgical Patients With Severe Aortic Stenosis: Results of the REPRISE II Study.120例严重主动脉瓣狭窄高危手术患者使用可完全重新定位和回收的Lotus经导管主动脉瓣置换瓣膜的1年结局:REPRISE II研究结果
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2016 Feb 22;9(4):376-384. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2015.10.024.
9
Comparison of Self-Expanding and Mechanically Expanded Transcatheter Aortic Valve Prostheses.自膨式与机械扩张式经导管主动脉瓣假体的比较。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2015 Jun;8(7):962-71. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2015.03.014.
10
Paravalvular regurgitation after transcatheter aortic valve replacement with the Edwards sapien valve in the PARTNER trial: characterizing patients and impact on outcomes.经导管主动脉瓣置换术后爱德华兹 sapien 瓣膜瓣周漏:患者特征分析及对结局的影响。
Eur Heart J. 2015 Feb 14;36(7):449-56. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehu384. Epub 2014 Oct 1.