Sengupta Kaushik, Christensen Lisa Bøge, Mortensen Laust Hvas, Skovgaard Lene Theil, Andersen Ingelise
Section of Social Medicine, Department of Public Health, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Department of Odontology, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2017 Oct;45(5):458-468. doi: 10.1111/cdoe.12310. Epub 2017 Jun 27.
Scandinavian welfare states, despite having better population oral health than less egalitarian societies, are characterized by ubiquitous social gradients and large relative socioeconomic inequalities in oral health. However, trends in these inequalities among Scandinavian children and adolescents have not been studied in detail.
To describe the associations between socioeconomic position (SEP) and oral health in adolescents and to investigate the trends in these associations between 1995 and 2013.
Nationwide repeated cross-sectional studies (using individual-level data) were conducted on 15-year-olds in Denmark from 1995, 2003, and 2013 (N=154,750). Dental data were obtained from the national dental register of the Danish Health Authority (Sundhedsstyrelsens Centrale Odontologiske Register [SCOR]) and data on social variables from administrative registers at Statistics Denmark. SEP measures included previous year's parental education (highest attained educational level by either of the parents), income (equivalized household disposable income), and occupational social class (highest recorded occupational class between the parents). Covariates were immigration status, country of origin, number of children and persons in the family, and household type. The outcome was dental caries experience, represented by the decayed, missing, and filled surfaces (DMFS) index. Negative binomial regression models were used to examine the association between DMFS count and each of the explanatory variables separately while accounting for cluster-correlated family data. Furthermore, hierarchical multiple regressions of DMFS on SEP indicators-using the zero-inflated negative binomial (ZINB) distribution as the outcome distribution-were estimated while successively adjusting for the potential effects of the included covariates.
Caries prevalence declined from 71% in 1995 to 63% in 2003 and 45% in 2013. Separate assessment of each covariate showed statistically significant graded associations between each covariate and DMFS count at all time points. Similarly, in the ZINB models, in all 3 years, clear gradients were observed in terms of caries differentials in all three SEP categories, with statistically significant associations (Type 3 P values, <.0001) even after adjustment for all other covariates. For instance, in 2013, even among adolescents with positive caries experience, being of lower occupational social class was associated with up to 2.4-fold (95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.2-2.6) higher caries experience. Between 1995 and 2013, relative inequalities increased in all SEP categories, while absolute inequalities decreased in the education and occupation categories.
Considerable progress has been made in reducing dental caries rates among Danish adolescents; however, this progress has benefited the disadvantaged social groups less than the better-off groups.
斯堪的纳维亚福利国家尽管在人口口腔健康方面比社会平等程度较低的社会更好,但却存在普遍的社会梯度以及口腔健康方面巨大的相对社会经济不平等。然而,斯堪的纳维亚儿童和青少年中这些不平等的趋势尚未得到详细研究。
描述青少年社会经济地位(SEP)与口腔健康之间的关联,并调查1995年至2013年期间这些关联的趋势。
对丹麦15岁青少年进行了1995年、2003年和2013年的全国性重复横断面研究(使用个体层面数据)(N = 154,750)。牙科数据来自丹麦卫生当局的国家牙科登记处(Sundhedsstyrelsens Centrale Odontologiske Register [SCOR]),社会变量数据来自丹麦统计局的行政登记处。SEP测量指标包括上一年父母的教育程度(父母中最高获得的教育水平)、收入(等价家庭可支配收入)和职业社会阶层(父母之间记录的最高职业阶层)。协变量包括移民身份、原籍国、家庭中的子女和人数以及家庭类型。结果是龋齿经历,用龋失补牙面(DMFS)指数表示。使用负二项回归模型分别检查DMFS计数与每个解释变量之间的关联,同时考虑聚类相关的家庭数据。此外,在依次调整纳入协变量的潜在影响的同时,估计了以零膨胀负二项分布(ZINB)作为结果分布的DMFS对SEP指标的分层多元回归。
龋齿患病率从1995年的71%下降到2003年的63%和2013年的45%。对每个协变量的单独评估显示,在所有时间点,每个协变量与DMFS计数之间存在统计学上显著的分级关联。同样,在ZINB模型中,在所有3年中,在所有三个SEP类别中,在龋齿差异方面都观察到明显的梯度,即使在调整所有其他协变量后,也存在统计学上显著的关联(第3类P值,<.0001)。例如,在2013年,即使在有龋齿经历的青少年中,职业社会阶层较低的青少年的龋齿经历也高达2.4倍(95%置信区间[CI]:2.2 - 2.6)。在1995年至2013年期间,所有SEP类别中的相对不平等增加,而教育和职业类别中的绝对不平等减少。
丹麦青少年在降低龋齿率方面取得了相当大的进展;然而,这一进展使弱势群体受益少于富裕群体。