Suppr超能文献

全反式维甲酸、三氧化二砷与蒽环类药物联合诱导治疗急性早幼粒细胞白血病患者的疗效

[Efficacy of combination of ATRA, ATO and anthracyclines induction therapy in patients with acute promyelocytic leukemia].

作者信息

Ma R J, Zhu Z M, Yuan X L, Jiang L, Yang S W, Yang J, Guo J M, Zhang L, Lei P C, Wang Z, Zang Y Z, Chen Y Q, Wang T B, Kong D, Sun K, Zhang Y

机构信息

Department of Hematology, Henan Provincial People's Hospital, Zhengzhou 450003, China.

出版信息

Zhonghua Xue Ye Xue Za Zhi. 2017 Jun 14;38(6):523-527. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-2727.2017.06.011.

Abstract

To explore the efficacies of regimens of three-drug induction therapy (ATRA+ATO+anthracyclines) versus two-drug induction therapy (ATRA+ATO) in patients with acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL). Of 184 patients diagnosed with APL from January 2009 to March 2016, 58 patients underwent three-drug induction therapy, while the rest were treated with two-drug induction therapy. Three-drug induction therapy was of ATRA (20 mg·m(-2)·d(-1), d(1-28)) + ATO (0.16 mg·kg(-1)·d(-1), d(1-28)) + Idarubicin (8 mg·m(-2)·d(-1), d(3-5)) /daunorubicin (40 mg·m(-2)·d(-1), d(3-5)) , while two-drug induction therapy ATRA+ATO with the same doses and methods as above. Of 184 cases, 69 cases accompanied with WBC counts>10×10(9)/L, 115 cases with WBC counts≤10×10(9)/L at onset. ①Short-term efficacy: After one cycle induction therapy, the rates of hematologic remission, genetic remission, molecular remission and induced differentiation syndrome (DS) in three-drug regimen group were 98.3%, 87.9%, 72.4% and 0 respectively, while those in two-drug regimen group were 87.3%, 65.9%, 51.6% and 12.7% respectively. In patients with WBC >10×10(9)/L, DS rate and early mortality in three-drug regimen group were lower than in two-drug regimen group (0 15.6%, 4.2% 15.6%, respectively). In patients with WBC≤10×10(9)/L, DS rate in three-drug regimen group was also lower than in two-drug regimen group (0 12.3%) , but there were no statistical differences in terms of relapse and early mortality. ② Long-term efficacy: The relapse rate, overall survival (OS) and disease free survival (DFS) in three-drug regimen group were 0, 98.5%, 96.6% respectively, while those in two-drug regimen group were 8.6%, 86.5% and 84.1% respectively; the advantages of three-drug over two-drug regimen, especially in cases of WBC >10×10(9)/L were observed. ③ Side effects: the incidences of gastrointestinal reaction, liver dysfunction, myocardial damage and headache in three-drug regimen group hardly increased. The efficacies of three-drug induction therapy were superior to two-drug one.

摘要

探讨三药诱导治疗方案(全反式维甲酸+三氧化二砷+蒽环类药物)与两药诱导治疗方案(全反式维甲酸+三氧化二砷)对急性早幼粒细胞白血病(APL)患者的疗效。在2009年1月至2016年3月确诊的184例APL患者中,58例接受三药诱导治疗,其余患者接受两药诱导治疗。三药诱导治疗方案为全反式维甲酸(20mg·m⁻²·d⁻¹,第1 - 28天)+三氧化二砷(0.16mg·kg⁻¹·d⁻¹,第1 - 28天)+伊达比星(8mg·m⁻²·d⁻¹,第3 - 5天)/柔红霉素(40mg·m⁻²·d⁻¹,第3 - 5天),两药诱导治疗方案为全反式维甲酸+三氧化二砷,剂量和方法同上。184例患者中,69例起病时白细胞计数>10×10⁹/L,115例起病时白细胞计数≤10×10⁹/L。①短期疗效:诱导治疗1个周期后,三药方案组血液学缓解率、遗传学缓解率、分子学缓解率及诱导分化综合征(DS)发生率分别为98.3%、87.9%、72.4%和0,两药方案组分别为87.3% 、65.9%、51.6%和12.7%。白细胞>10×10⁹/L的患者中,三药方案组DS发生率和早期死亡率低于两药方案组(分别为0对15.6%,4.2%对15.6%)。白细胞≤10×10⁹/L的患者中,三药方案组DS发生率也低于两药方案组(0对12.3%),但复发率和早期死亡率无统计学差异。②长期疗效:三药方案组复发率、总生存率(OS)和无病生存率(DFS)分别为0、98.5%、96.6%,两药方案组分别为8.6%、86.5%和84.1%;观察到三药方案优于两药方案,尤其在白细胞>10×10⁹/L的病例中。③副作用:三药方案组胃肠道反应、肝功能损害、心肌损害及头痛的发生率几乎未增加。三药诱导治疗的疗效优于两药诱导治疗。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验