T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Harvard University, Boston, Massachusetts.
Department of Neurosurgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Neurosurgery. 2017 Nov 1;81(5):761-771. doi: 10.1093/neuros/nyx089.
Reoperation has been increasingly utilized as a metric evaluating quality of care.
To evaluate the rate of, reasons for, and predictors of unplanned reoperation after craniotomy for tumor in a nationally accrued population.
Patients who underwent cranial tumor resection were extracted from the prospective National Surgical Quality Improvement Program registry (2012-2014). Multivariate logistic regression examined predictors of unplanned cranial reoperation. Predictors screened included patient age, sex, tumor location and histology, functional status, comorbidities, preoperative laboratory values, operative urgency, and time.
Of the 11 462 patients included, 3.1% (n = 350) underwent an unplanned cranial reoperation. The most common reasons for cranial reoperation were intracranial hematoma evacuation (22.5%), superficial or intracranial surgical site infections (11.9%), re-resection of tumor (8.4%), decompressive craniectomy (6.1%), and repair of cerebrospinal fluid leakage (5.6%). The strongest predictor of any cranial reoperation was preoperative thrombocytopenia (less than 100 000/μL, odds ratio [OR] = 2.51, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.23-5.10, P = .01). Thrombocytopenia, hypertension, emergent surgery, and longer operative time were predictors of reoperation for hematoma (P ≤ .004), while dependent functional status, morbid obesity, leukocytosis, and longer operative time were predictors of reoperation for infection (P < .05). Although any unplanned cranial reoperation was not associated with differential odds of mortality (OR = 1.68, 95% CI: 0.94-3.00, P = .08), hematoma evacuation was significantly associated with thirty-day death (P = .04).
In this national analysis, unplanned cranial reoperation was primarily associated with operative indices, rather than preoperative characteristics, suggesting that reoperation may have some utility as a quality indicator. However, hypertension and thrombocytopenia were potentially modifiable predictors of reoperation.
再次手术已被越来越多地用作评估医疗质量的指标。
评估全国范围内接受肿瘤开颅手术患者的计划性再手术率、原因和预测因素。
从前瞻性国家手术质量改进计划登记处(2012-2014 年)中提取接受颅肿瘤切除术的患者。多变量逻辑回归分析了计划性颅骨再手术的预测因素。筛选的预测因素包括患者年龄、性别、肿瘤位置和组织学、功能状态、合并症、术前实验室值、手术紧迫性和时间。
在纳入的 11462 例患者中,有 3.1%(n=350)患者行计划性颅骨再手术。颅骨再手术最常见的原因是颅内血肿清除术(22.5%)、浅表或颅内手术部位感染(11.9%)、肿瘤再切除术(8.4%)、减压性颅骨切除术(6.1%)和脑脊液漏修复术(5.6%)。任何计划性颅骨再手术的最强预测因素是术前血小板减少症(血小板计数<100000/μL,优势比[OR] = 2.51,95%置信区间[CI]:1.23-5.10,P =.01)。血小板减少症、高血压、急诊手术和较长的手术时间是血肿再手术的预测因素(P ≤.004),而功能依赖状态、病态肥胖、白细胞增多和较长的手术时间是感染再手术的预测因素(P <.05)。虽然任何计划性颅骨再手术与死亡率的差异无统计学意义(OR = 1.68,95%CI:0.94-3.00,P =.08),但血肿清除术与 30 天死亡显著相关(P =.04)。
在这项全国性分析中,计划性颅骨再手术主要与手术指标相关,而与术前特征无关,这表明再手术可能作为一种质量指标具有一定的效用。然而,高血压和血小板减少症是再手术的潜在可改变预测因素。