Russell Esposito Elizabeth, Rábago Christopher A, Wilken Jason
1 Center for the Intrepid, Brooke Army Medical Center, JBSA, Fort Sam Houston, TX, USA.
2 Extremity Trauma and Amputation Center of Excellence, Brooke Army Medical Center, JBSA, Fort Sam Houston, TX, USA.
Prosthet Orthot Int. 2018 Apr;42(2):214-222. doi: 10.1177/0309364617708649. Epub 2017 Jun 27.
Recent literature indicates equivalent costs of walking can be achieved after a transtibial amputation when the individual is young, active, and/or has extensive access to rehabilitative care. It is unknown if a similar cohort with transfemoral amputation can also achieve lower metabolic costs of walking than previously reported.
Compare metabolic cost in individuals with a transfemoral amputation to controls and to the literature across a range of walking speeds.
Cross-sectional.
A total of 14 individuals with a unilateral transfemoral amputation (27 ± 5 years, N = 4 mechanical knee, N = 10 microprocessor knee) and 14 able-bodied controls (26 ± 6 years) walked at self-selected and four standardized speeds. Heart rate, metabolic rate (mL O/kg/min), metabolic cost (mL O/kg/m), and rating of perceived exertion were calculated.
Self-selected speed was 8.6% slower in the transfemoral amputation group ( p = 0.031). Across standardized speeds, both metabolic rate and metabolic cost ranged from 44%-47% greater in the transfemoral amputation group ( p < 0.001), heart rate was 24%-33% greater ( p < 0.001), and perceived exertion was 24%-35% greater ( p < 0.009).
Although the transfemoral amputation group was relatively young, physically fit, and had extensive access to rehabilitative care, the metabolic cost of walking fell within the ranges of the literature on older or presumably less fit individuals with transfemoral amputation. Clinical relevance Developments in prosthetic technology and/or rehabilitative care may be warranted and may reduce the metabolic cost of walking in individuals with a transfemoral amputation.
近期文献表明,对于年轻、活跃且/或能广泛获得康复护理的个体,经胫截肢术后可实现与步行相当的成本。目前尚不清楚类似的经股截肢人群是否也能实现比先前报道更低的步行代谢成本。
比较经股截肢个体与对照组以及不同步行速度下文献报道的代谢成本。
横断面研究。
共有14名单侧经股截肢个体(27±5岁,4例为机械膝关节,10例为微处理器控制膝关节)和14名健全对照者(26±6岁)以自我选择的速度和四种标准化速度行走。计算心率、代谢率(毫升氧/千克/分钟)、代谢成本(毫升氧/千克/米)和主观用力程度评分。
经股截肢组的自我选择速度慢8.6%(p = 0.031)。在标准化速度下,经股截肢组的代谢率和代谢成本均高出44%-47%(p < 0.001),心率高出24%-33%(p < 0.001),主观用力程度高出24%-35%(p < 0.009)。
尽管经股截肢组相对年轻、身体健康且能广泛获得康复护理,但其步行代谢成本仍处于关于年龄较大或可能身体状况较差的经股截肢个体的文献报道范围内。临床意义:可能需要在假肢技术和/或康复护理方面取得进展,以降低经股截肢个体的步行代谢成本。