• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

平价医疗法案的避孕覆盖要求对处方口服避孕药的使用和自付费用的影响。

Effects of the Affordable Care Act's contraceptive coverage requirement on the utilization and out-of-pocket costs of prescribed oral contraceptives.

机构信息

Social and Administrative Sciences Division, University of Wisconsin-Madison School of Pharmacy, 777 Highland Ave., Madison, WI 53705-2222, USA.

Social and Administrative Sciences Division, University of Wisconsin-Madison School of Pharmacy, 777 Highland Ave., Madison, WI 53705-2222, USA.

出版信息

Res Social Adm Pharm. 2018 May;14(5):479-487. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2017.06.005. Epub 2017 Jun 17.

DOI:10.1016/j.sapharm.2017.06.005
PMID:28655491
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The Affordable Care Act (ACA) mandated that private health insurance plans cover prescribed contraceptive services for women, including oral contraceptives (OCs), without charging a patient any cost-sharing beginning in August 2012.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effects of the ACA's contraceptive coverage requirement on the utilization and out-of-pocket costs of prescribed OCs after two years of implementation.

METHODS

A retrospective, cross-sectional study was designed using data from the 2010 to 2014 waves of the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey. The sample consisted of reproductive-aged women who have either private health insurance or Medicaid. Utilization of OCs was evaluated using 1) the proportion of women who purchased any OCs and 2) the mean annual number of cycles prescribed per woman. Out-of-pocket costs for OCs were evaluated using 1) the proportion of women who had any OC purchase with $0 out-of-pocket costs, 2) the mean annual out-of-pocket costs per woman, and 3) the mean out-of-pocket costs per cycle. Descriptive analyses and a difference-in-difference linear regression approach were used.

MAIN FINDINGS

No substantial changes were seen in the utilization of OCs after the ACA requirement became effective. The difference-in-difference regression showed that the proportion of women who had any OC purchase with $0 out-of-pocket costs increased significantly by 54.0 percentage points after the ACA requirement in the private insurance group relative to the Medicaid group. Mean annual out-of-pocket costs in the private insurance group dropped by 37% in the first year and an additional 52% decrease was found in the second year of the policy. Mean out-of-pocket costs per cycle also decreased substantially in the private insurance group by 39% in the first year and an additional decrease of 44% was seen in the second year.

CONCLUSIONS

The ACA's contraceptive coverage requirement markedly reduced out-of-pocket costs of prescribed OCs for women with private health insurance.

摘要

背景

平价医疗法案(ACA)要求私人医疗保险计划为女性提供处方避孕药具(OC)的覆盖,自 2012 年 8 月起,不得向患者收取任何费用分担。

目的

评估 ACA 避孕覆盖要求在实施两年后对指定口服避孕药的使用和自付费用的影响。

方法

采用 2010 年至 2014 年医疗支出面板调查数据进行回顾性、横断面研究。样本由有私人医疗保险或医疗补助的育龄妇女组成。OC 的使用情况通过以下两种方法评估:1)购买任何 OC 的女性比例;2)每位女性每年平均开处方的周期数。OC 的自付费用通过以下三种方法评估:1)没有任何 OC 购买自付费用的女性比例;2)每位女性每年平均自付费用;3)每个周期的平均自付费用。采用描述性分析和差异-差异线性回归方法。

主要发现

ACA 要求生效后,OC 的使用没有明显变化。差异-差异回归显示,在私人保险组中,与医疗补助组相比,自付费用为 0 的 OC 购买者比例在 ACA 要求生效后显著增加了 54.0 个百分点。私人保险组的年平均自付费用在政策实施的第一年下降了 37%,第二年又下降了 52%。每个周期的平均自付费用在私人保险组也大幅下降,第一年下降了 39%,第二年又下降了 44%。

结论

ACA 的避孕覆盖要求显著降低了拥有私人医疗保险的女性处方避孕药具的自付费用。

相似文献

1
Effects of the Affordable Care Act's contraceptive coverage requirement on the utilization and out-of-pocket costs of prescribed oral contraceptives.平价医疗法案的避孕覆盖要求对处方口服避孕药的使用和自付费用的影响。
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2018 May;14(5):479-487. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2017.06.005. Epub 2017 Jun 17.
2
Are women benefiting from the Affordable Care Act? A real-world evaluation of the impact of the Affordable Care Act on out-of-pocket costs for contraceptives.女性是否从《平价医疗法案》中受益?对《平价医疗法案》对避孕药具自付费用影响的实际评估。
Contraception. 2016 May;93(5):392-7. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2016.01.008. Epub 2016 Jan 21.
3
The Impact of the Affordable Care Act on Contraceptive Use and Costs among Privately Insured Women.平价医疗法案对私人保险女性避孕措施使用和费用的影响。
Womens Health Issues. 2018 May-Jun;28(3):219-223. doi: 10.1016/j.whi.2018.01.005. Epub 2018 Mar 13.
4
Changes in out-of-pocket payments for contraception by privately insured women during implementation of the federal contraceptive coverage requirement.在联邦避孕覆盖要求实施期间,私人保险女性避孕自付费用的变化。
Contraception. 2014 Feb;89(2):97-102. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2013.11.015. Epub 2013 Dec 11.
5
Effects of the Affordable Care Act's young adult insurance expansion on prescription drug insurance coverage, utilization, and expenditures.《平价医疗法案》中年轻人医疗保险扩展对处方药保险覆盖范围、使用情况及支出的影响。
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2016 Sep-Oct;12(5):682-98. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2015.10.005. Epub 2015 Oct 28.
6
Women Saw Large Decrease In Out-Of-Pocket Spending For Contraceptives After ACA Mandate Removed Cost Sharing.ACA 禁令取消了避孕措施的费用分担后,女性的避孕措施自付费用大幅下降。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2015 Jul;34(7):1204-11. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2015.0127.
7
Impact of the federal contraceptive coverage guarantee on out-of-pocket payments for contraceptives: 2014 update.联邦避孕保险保障对避孕药自付费用的影响:2014年更新
Contraception. 2015 Jan;91(1):44-8. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2014.09.006. Epub 2014 Sep 18.
8
Out-of-Pocket Spending and Premium Contributions After Implementation of the Affordable Care Act.平价医疗法案实施后的自付支出和保费缴纳情况。
JAMA Intern Med. 2018 Mar 1;178(3):347-355. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2017.8060.
9
Utilization of and Adherence to Oral Contraceptive Pills and Associated Disparities in the United States: A Baseline Assessment for the Impact of the Affordable Care Act of 2010.美国口服避孕药的使用、依从性及相关差异:对2010年《平价医疗法案》影响的基线评估
Int J Health Serv. 2015;45(4):729-42. doi: 10.1177/0020731415591244. Epub 2015 Jul 6.
10
Did Contraceptive Use Patterns Change after the Affordable Care Act? A Descriptive Analysis.《平价医疗法案》实施后避孕措施的使用模式有变化吗?一项描述性分析。
Womens Health Issues. 2017 May-Jun;27(3):316-321. doi: 10.1016/j.whi.2017.01.006. Epub 2017 Mar 8.

引用本文的文献

1
Who determines United States Healthcare out-of-pocket costs? Factor ranking and selection using ensemble learning.谁决定美国医疗保健的自付费用?使用集成学习进行因素排名和选择。
Health Inf Sci Syst. 2021 Jun 7;9(1):22. doi: 10.1007/s13755-021-00153-9. eCollection 2021 Dec.
2
The Affordable Care Act contraception mandate & unintended pregnancy in women of reproductive age: An analysis of the National Survey of Family Growth, 2008-2010 v. 2013-2015.平价医疗法案避孕规定与育龄妇女意外怀孕:2008-2010 年全国家庭增长调查与 2013-2015 年对比分析。
Contraception. 2020 Jan;101(1):34-39. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2019.09.003. Epub 2019 Oct 23.
3
Effect of Providing Contraception Free of Charge.
免费提供避孕措施的效果。
Am J Public Health. 2018 Apr;108(4):435-436. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2018.304316.