• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

年轻患者的全膝关节置换:注册人群中的生存率和翻修原因。

Total Knee Replacement in Young Patients: Survival and Causes of Revision in a Registry Population.

机构信息

Hip and Knee Surgery, Rizzoli Orthopedic Institute, Bologna, Italy.

Medical Technology Laboratory, Rizzoli Orthopedic Institute, Bologna, Italy.

出版信息

J Arthroplasty. 2017 Nov;32(11):3368-3372. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2017.05.052. Epub 2017 Jun 8.

DOI:10.1016/j.arth.2017.05.052
PMID:28655567
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The incidence of total knee replacements (TKRs) in young patients is increasing. Few reports described encouraging results and acceptable survival rates. However, many concerns still persist, in particular about the high rates of infection and aseptic loosening. Aim of this article was to investigate the survival of TKRs in patients aged 45 years or younger in a registry population.

METHODS

The Emilia-Romagna registry RIPO was enquired about TKRs in patients ≤45 years; 238 TKRs were evaluated at a mean follow-up of 5.4 years (range 0-15.6 years), examining the features of the patients involved, the survival rate, and the reasons for revision of the knee implants.

RESULTS

The TKRs were generally performed in men, in private hospitals, and almost in half of the cases for other causes rather than primary osteoarthritis. The mean age was 40 years. Bicompartmental, cemented posterior-stabilized implants with fixed bearing were preferred. The survival rate was higher than 90% in the first 7 years, and then it decremented. The choice of implant did not apparently influence the survivorship. The final outcomes were acceptable, substantially in line with the previous literature about young patients. Twenty-one revisions occurred (8.8%), in particular 8 cases for aseptic loosening and 7 TKRs for infection. The rate of revision was higher than in overall population and even in some young cohorts.

CONCLUSION

TKRs in patients aged 45 years or younger seem a promising procedure, although the high rates of septic and aseptic loosening should be carefully evaluated. Prospective, well-designed studies are required to confirm and investigate these preliminary findings.

摘要

背景

全膝关节置换术(TKR)在年轻患者中的发病率正在增加。少数报道描述了令人鼓舞的结果和可接受的生存率。然而,仍存在许多担忧,特别是感染和无菌性松动的高发生率。本文旨在研究注册人群中 45 岁或以下患者 TKR 的生存率。

方法

询问 Emilia-Romagna 注册处 RIPO 有关 45 岁以下患者的 TKR;在平均 5.4 年(0-15.6 年)的随访中评估了 238 例 TKR,检查了所涉及患者的特征、生存率以及膝关节植入物翻修的原因。

结果

TKR 通常在男性、私立医院进行,几乎一半的病例是其他原因而不是原发性骨关节炎。平均年龄为 40 岁。双间室、水泥固定后稳定型植入物、固定轴承是首选。在最初的 7 年内,生存率高于 90%,然后下降。植入物的选择显然不会影响生存率。最终结果是可以接受的,与之前关于年轻患者的文献基本一致。发生了 21 次翻修(8.8%),特别是 8 例因无菌性松动,7 例因感染而进行 TKR。翻修率高于总体人群,甚至高于某些年轻队列。

结论

45 岁或以下患者的 TKR 似乎是一种有前途的手术,但应仔细评估感染和无菌性松动的高发生率。需要前瞻性、精心设计的研究来证实和研究这些初步发现。

相似文献

1
Total Knee Replacement in Young Patients: Survival and Causes of Revision in a Registry Population.年轻患者的全膝关节置换:注册人群中的生存率和翻修原因。
J Arthroplasty. 2017 Nov;32(11):3368-3372. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2017.05.052. Epub 2017 Jun 8.
2
Comparison of survival rate and risk of revision for mobile-bearing and fixed-bearing total knee replacements.活动平台与固定平台全膝关节置换术的生存率及翻修风险比较。
Eklem Hastalik Cerrahisi. 2019 Aug;30(2):70-8. doi: 10.5606/ehc.2019.62830.
3
Increased risk of aseptic loosening for 43,525 rotating-platform vs. fixed-bearing total knee replacements.43525例旋转平台与固定平台全膝关节置换术后无菌性松动风险增加。
Acta Orthop. 2017 Dec;88(6):649-656. doi: 10.1080/17453674.2017.1378533. Epub 2017 Sep 20.
4
A Matched Comparison of the Long-Term Outcomes of Cemented and Cementless Total Knee Replacements: An Analysis from the National Joint Registry of England, Wales, Northern Ireland and the Isle of Man.骨水泥型与非骨水泥型全膝关节置换术长期疗效的匹配比较:来自英格兰、威尔士、北爱尔兰和马恩岛国家关节登记处的分析
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2021 Dec 15;103(24):2270-2280. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.21.00179.
5
Major Aseptic Revision Following Total Knee Replacement: A Study of 478,081 Total Knee Replacements from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry.全膝关节置换术后主要无菌性翻修:来自澳大利亚矫形协会全国关节置换登记处的 478081 例全膝关节置换术研究。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2019 Feb 20;101(4):302-310. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.17.01528.
6
Does pre-coating total knee tibial implants affect the risk of aseptic revision?预涂层全膝关节胫骨植入物是否会影响无菌翻修的风险?
Bone Joint J. 2013 Mar;95-B(3):367-70. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.95B3.27585.
7
Survival rates and causes of revision in cemented primary total knee replacement: a report from the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register 1994-2009.在骨水泥初次全膝关节置换翻修中,生存率和翻修原因:来自挪威关节置换登记 1994-2009 年的报告。
Bone Joint J. 2013 May;95-B(5):636-42. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.95B5.30271.
8
Increased risk of early and medium-term revision after post-fracture total knee arthroplasty.骨折后全膝关节置换术后早期和中期翻修风险增加。
Acta Orthop. 2017 Jun;88(3):263-268. doi: 10.1080/17453674.2017.1290479. Epub 2017 Feb 14.
9
Effect of Surgical Caseload on Revision Rate Following Total and Unicompartmental Knee Replacement.全膝关节和单髁膝关节置换术后手术量对翻修率的影响。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2016 Jan 6;98(1):1-8. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.N.00487.
10
Survival of the low contact stress rotating platform total knee replacement is influenced by age: 1058 implants with a minimum follow-up of 10 years.低接触应力旋转平台全膝关节置换术的生存率受年龄影响:1058例植入物,最短随访10年。
Knee. 2018 Dec;25(6):1283-1291. doi: 10.1016/j.knee.2018.08.020. Epub 2018 Sep 17.

引用本文的文献

1
Return to sport after total knee arthroplasty: an Australian perspective.全膝关节置换术后重返运动:澳大利亚视角
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2025 Apr 11;145(1):236. doi: 10.1007/s00402-025-05843-7.
2
Varus-Valgus Constrained Prostheses in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Retrospective Study of Mid- to Long-Term Outcomes.翻修全膝关节置换术中的内外翻受限假体:中长期疗效的回顾性研究
Cureus. 2025 Jan 31;17(1):e78273. doi: 10.7759/cureus.78273. eCollection 2025 Jan.
3
Multi-Scale Analysis of Knee Joint Acoustic Signals for Cartilage Degeneration Assessment.
用于软骨退变评估的膝关节声学信号多尺度分析
Sensors (Basel). 2025 Jan 24;25(3):706. doi: 10.3390/s25030706.
4
Excellent 2-Year Outcomes of a Midlevel Constrained Liner Used in Stemless Primary TKA.用于无柄初次全膝关节置换术的中级约束型衬垫的2年卓越疗效
HSS J. 2025 May;21(2):184-191. doi: 10.1177/15563316241233293. Epub 2024 Mar 3.
5
The Epidemiology of the Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty in the United States From 2016 to 2022.2016年至2022年美国翻修全髋关节置换术的流行病学
Arthroplast Today. 2024 Oct 29;30:101517. doi: 10.1016/j.artd.2024.101517. eCollection 2024 Dec.
6
Is there an increased revision rate due to early tibial component loosening with a modern total knee arthroplasty design? A retrospective analysis from a large volume arthroplasty centre.采用现代全膝关节置换设计时,胫骨组件早期松动会导致翻修率增加吗?来自一个大型关节置换中心的回顾性分析。
Arthroplasty. 2024 Aug 3;6(1):46. doi: 10.1186/s42836-024-00264-0.
7
Survivorship of total knee arthroplasty in poliomyelitis patients: long-term results from the R.I.P.O. registry and single-institution retrospective study.小儿麻痹症患者全膝关节置换术后的存活率:R.I.P.O. 注册中心和单机构回顾性研究的长期结果。
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2024 Aug;144(8):3641-3648. doi: 10.1007/s00402-024-05426-y. Epub 2024 Jul 28.
8
Joint line and knee osteotomy.关节线与膝关节截骨术
EFORT Open Rev. 2024 May 10;9(5):375-386. doi: 10.1530/EOR-24-0037.
9
Clinical outcome and survival rate of condylar constrained knee prosthesis in revision total knee arthroplasty: an average nine point six year follow-up.在翻修全膝关节置换术中使用髁限制型膝关节假体的临床结果和生存率:平均 9.6 年随访。
Int Orthop. 2024 May;48(5):1179-1187. doi: 10.1007/s00264-024-06096-6. Epub 2024 Feb 14.
10
Treatment of Simultaneous Femoral Supracondylar Nonunion and Tibial Plateau Malunion along with Stiff Knee in a Young Patient: A Case Report.一名年轻患者股骨髁上骨不连、胫骨平台骨愈合不良合并膝关节僵硬的治疗:病例报告
Arch Bone Jt Surg. 2023;11(12):783-786. doi: 10.22038/ABJS.2023.74326.3440.