Division of Hematology, Department of Internal Medicine, GROW, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Division of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, Bravis Hospital, Roosendaal, The Netherlands.
Eur J Haematol. 2017 Oct;99(4):315-322. doi: 10.1111/ejh.12919. Epub 2017 Aug 1.
Patients with hematological malignancies admitted to an intensive care unit (ICU) have a poor prognosis. The Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score is used to monitor patients on the ICU. Little is known about the value of this score in hematology patients. Therefore, the prognostic value of the SOFA score and a modified hematological SOFA score (SOFAhem) was studied.
Patients with hematological malignancies admitted to the ICU between 1999 and 2009 were analyzed in a retrospective cohort study. The SOFAhem score was defined as the original SOFA score omitting the coagulation and neurological parameters.
In 149 admissions, ICU mortality was 52%. Mortality was significantly associated with higher SOFA and SOFAhem scores on admission, and trend in SOFAhem scores. An unchanged and increased SOFAhem score compared to decreasing SOFAhem scores was associated with a higher mortality rate (53% resp 67% resp 25%).
Trends in SOFA or SOFAhem score are both suitable as prognostic parameter. The trend in SOFAhem score seems to be independently related to mortality in hematological patients admitted to the ICU, and because of the higher odds ratios and lower P-values compared to the SOFA score, it is probably stronger related to mortality than the classical score, but its prognostic value should be tested in a larger cohort.
入住重症监护病房(ICU)的血液恶性肿瘤患者预后较差。序贯器官衰竭评估(SOFA)评分用于监测 ICU 中的患者。关于该评分在血液学患者中的价值知之甚少。因此,研究了 SOFA 评分和改良血液学 SOFA 评分(SOFAhem)的预后价值。
对 1999 年至 2009 年期间入住 ICU 的血液恶性肿瘤患者进行回顾性队列研究分析。SOFAhem 评分定义为原始 SOFA 评分减去凝血和神经学参数。
在 149 例住院中,ICU 死亡率为 52%。死亡率与入院时较高的 SOFA 和 SOFAhem 评分以及 SOFAhem 评分的趋势显著相关。与 SOFAhem 评分下降相比,SOFAhem 评分不变或增加与更高的死亡率相关(分别为 53%、67%和 25%)。
SOFA 或 SOFAhem 评分的趋势均适合作为预后参数。SOFAhem 评分的趋势似乎与 ICU 收治的血液学患者的死亡率独立相关,并且与 SOFA 评分相比,其优势比和 P 值较低,因此与死亡率的关系可能比经典评分更强,但需要在更大的队列中验证其预后价值。