Suppr超能文献

SOFA 评分的发展、在临床试验中准确评估的效用和挑战。

The SOFA score-development, utility and challenges of accurate assessment in clinical trials.

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Addenbrooke's Hospital, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB20Q, UK.

St Luc University Hospital, Université Catholique de Louvain, Avenue Hippocrate 12, 1200, Brussels, Belgium.

出版信息

Crit Care. 2019 Nov 27;23(1):374. doi: 10.1186/s13054-019-2663-7.

Abstract

The Sequential Organ Failure Assessment or SOFA score was developed to assess the acute morbidity of critical illness at a population level and has been widely validated as a tool for this purpose across a range of healthcare settings and environments.In recent years, the SOFA score has become extensively used in a range of other applications. A change in the SOFA score of 2 or more is now a defining characteristic of the sepsis syndrome, and the European Medicines Agency has accepted that a change in the SOFA score is an acceptable surrogate marker of efficacy in exploratory trials of novel therapeutic agents in sepsis. The requirement to detect modest serial changes in a patients' SOFA score therefore means that increased clarity on how the score should be assessed in different circumstances is required.This review explores the development of the SOFA score, its applications and the challenges associated with measurement. In addition, it proposes guidance designed to facilitate the consistent and valid assessment of the score in multicentre sepsis trials involving novel therapeutic agents or interventions.ConclusionThe SOFA score is an increasingly important tool in defining both the clinical condition of the individual patient and the response to therapies in the context of clinical trials. Standardisation between different assessors in widespread centres is key to detecting response to treatment if the SOFA score is to be used as an outcome in sepsis clinical trials.

摘要

序贯器官衰竭评估或 SOFA 评分是为了评估人群中危重病的急性发病率而开发的,已经在广泛的医疗保健环境中得到广泛验证,是一种用于此目的的工具。近年来,SOFA 评分已广泛应用于多种其他用途。SOFA 评分的变化 2 或更多现在是败血症综合征的定义特征,欧洲药品管理局已接受 SOFA 评分的变化是败血症新型治疗药物探索性试验中疗效的可接受替代标志物。因此,需要检测患者 SOFA 评分的适度连续变化,这意味着需要增加对评分在不同情况下如何进行评估的清晰度。本综述探讨了 SOFA 评分的发展、其应用以及与测量相关的挑战。此外,它提出了旨在促进在涉及新型治疗药物或干预措施的多中心败血症试验中对评分进行一致和有效评估的指导。结论 SOFA 评分是定义个体患者临床状况和临床试验中治疗反应的越来越重要的工具。如果 SOFA 评分要用作败血症临床试验的结局,广泛中心之间的不同评估者之间的标准化是检测治疗反应的关键。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

6
DPP4 inhibition curbs systemic inflammation.二肽基肽酶4抑制可抑制全身炎症。
Crit Care. 2025 Aug 15;29(1):359. doi: 10.1186/s13054-025-05599-x.

本文引用的文献

10
Angiotensin II for the Treatment of Vasodilatory Shock.血管扩张性休克的血管紧张素 II 治疗。
N Engl J Med. 2017 Aug 3;377(5):419-430. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1704154. Epub 2017 May 21.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验