Kubota Kousuke, Hidaka Hisashi, Nakazawa Takahide, Okuwaki Yusuke, Yamane Keiko, Inoue Tomoyoshi, Uojima Haruki, Takada Juichi, Tanaka Yoshiaki, Shibuya Akitaka, Fujii Kaoru, Woodhams Reiko, Matsunaga Keiji, Kokubu Shigehiro, Koizumi Wasaburo
Department of Gastroenterology, Internal Medicine, Kitasato University School of Medicine, Sagamihara, Japan.
Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Kitasato University School of Medicine, Sagamihara, Japan.
Hepatol Res. 2018 Feb;48(3):E98-E106. doi: 10.1111/hepr.12933. Epub 2017 Jul 30.
Transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) has been recognized as a treatment option for patients with intermediate hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). This randomized, controlled study compared the local control efficacy of TACE with miriplatin (platinum monohydrate) or with epirubicin.
The study group consisted of 200 Japanese patients with unresectable HCC treated at the Kitasato University East Hospital (Sagamihara, Japan) between July 2010 and June 2013. The primary end-point of the study was time to tumor progression (TTP).
We analyzed 198 patients (99 in the miriplatin group and 99 in the epirubicin group) treated with TACE. The median TTP in the epirubicin group was 5.9 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 4.8-7.0) and 7.6 months (95% CI, 5.8-9.4) in the miriplatin group. There was a significant difference between the two groups (P = 0.021; risk ratio, 1.488; 95% CI: 1.061-2.086). In the epirubicin group, 53 patients (53%) had complete response, 24 patients (24%) had partial response, 12 patients (12%) had stable disease, and 10 patients (10%) had progressive disease. In the miriplatin group, 38 patients (38%) had complete response, 41 patients (41%) had partial response, 2 patients (2%) had stable disease, and 18 patients (18%) had progressive disease. There was no significant difference in the response rate (P = 0.862). Overall incidences of adverse events and adverse drug reactions did not differ significantly between the two groups.
Miriplatin proved more effective than epirubicin in TACE for unresectable HCC. The trial described in this work has been registered under the trial number: UMIN000004790.
经动脉化疗栓塞术(TACE)已被公认为是中期肝细胞癌(HCC)患者的一种治疗选择。本随机对照研究比较了米铂(一水合铂)或表柔比星与TACE联合应用时的局部控制疗效。
研究组由2010年7月至2013年6月期间在日本北里大学东海医院(日本相模原)接受治疗的200例无法切除的HCC日本患者组成。该研究的主要终点是肿瘤进展时间(TTP)。
我们分析了198例接受TACE治疗的患者(米铂组99例,表柔比星组99例)。表柔比星组的中位TTP为5.9个月(95%置信区间[CI],4.8 - 7.0),米铂组为7.6个月(95%CI,5.8 - 9.4)。两组之间存在显著差异(P = 0.021;风险比,1.488;95%CI:1.061 - 2.086)。在表柔比星组中,53例患者(53%)完全缓解,24例患者(24%)部分缓解,12例患者(12%)病情稳定,10例患者(10%)病情进展。在米铂组中,38例患者(38%)完全缓解,41例患者(41%)部分缓解,2例患者(2%)病情稳定,18例患者(18%)病情进展。缓解率无显著差异(P = 0.862)。两组不良事件和药物不良反应的总体发生率无显著差异。
在TACE治疗无法切除的HCC方面,米铂比表柔比星更有效。本研究中描述的试验已在试验编号:UMIN000004790下注册。