Ennezat Pierre Vladimir, Cosgrove Shona, Marechaux Sylvestre, Bouvaist Hélène, Le Jemtel Thierry H, Vital Durand Denis
a Department of Cardiology , Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Grenoble , Grenoble , France.
b Trinity College Dublin , The University of Dublin , Dublin , Ireland.
Acta Cardiol. 2017 Dec;72(6):664-668. doi: 10.1080/00015385.2017.1297627. Epub 2017 Jun 28.
Ivabradine is an original drug that has been approved in two indications (systolic heart failure and angina). The aim of this short review is to draw the attention of clinician prescribers to the evidence base of ivabradine. Three large randomized trials testing ivabradine versus placebo have been performed. The BEAUTIFUL and SIGNIFY trials were in fact negative in the treatment of angina while the SHIFT trial found a marginal benefit of ivabradine over placebo in the treatment of heart failure. These important results are put into perspective in order to improve the assessment of risk-cost/benefit balances when ivabradine is considered. Ideally, a further clinical trial investigating the use of ivabradine in heart failure should be carried out with optimal treatment of the patient population in order to identify the subgroup of patients who respond to ivabradine.
伊伐布雷定是一种已获批用于两种适应症(收缩期心力衰竭和心绞痛)的原创药物。本简短综述的目的是引起临床处方医生对伊伐布雷定循证依据的关注。已开展了三项比较伊伐布雷定与安慰剂的大型随机试验。实际上,BEAUTIFUL试验和SIGNIFY试验在心绞痛治疗方面呈阴性结果,而SHIFT试验发现伊伐布雷定在心力衰竭治疗中比安慰剂有微弱益处。对这些重要结果进行了综合考量,以便在考虑使用伊伐布雷定时改进对风险 - 成本/效益平衡的评估。理想情况下,应针对患者群体进行最佳治疗,开展进一步的临床试验来研究伊伐布雷定在心力衰竭中的应用,以确定对伊伐布雷定有反应的患者亚组。