Wu Pang Hung, Dixit Anushri, Kiat Tan David Meng, Shen Liang, Chee Yu Han
1 Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Ng Teng Feng General Hospital, Jurong Health Campus, National University Hospital Systems, Singapore.
2 Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary, University of London, London, UK.
J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong). 2017 May-Aug;25(2):2309499017716278. doi: 10.1177/2309499017716278.
Fixing the two-part Mason II radial head fracture using screws is becoming a popular practice. However, the screw fixation efficacy for three-part Mason III and IV fractures is controversial. The purpose of this study is to determine the effectiveness of using a uniform technique of headless compression screw fixation in simple, isolated Mason II and complex three-part Mason III and IV radial head fractures in terms of functional outcome, treatment efficiency and assessment of complications with the procedure.
A prospective evaluation were performed on 31 adult patients with closed, non-pathological Mason II, III and IV radial head fractures sustained due to trauma and who underwent fixation using either two or three cannulated headless compression screws of 2.0 to 2.5 mm, and all patients were followed up for 2 years after the injury. They were divided into simple Mason II fracture group and complex three-part Mason III-IV fracture group. Operation time, time to discharge and radiological union were used as parameters for assessment of clinical outcome, while Mayo Elbow Performance Score, range of motion and complications were used to assess the functional outcomes.
Twelve cases of two-part simple fracture group and 18 cases of complex fracture group were identified. The mean age of 39 years is comparable between the two groups. Both groups had comparable days to union, mean hospital stay and operation time. In the simple fracture group, the mean Mayo Elbow Score was 97 (80-100), which is better than the complex fracture group score of 89 (75-100), p = 0.035. Both groups had no statistical difference in complication rates. All fractures united in our series. The mean range of motion for the simple fracture group was significant, with 133° ± 17.0° for flexion-extension arc, 85° ± 5° in pronation and supination as compared to the complex fracture group with 120° ± 20° flexion-extension arc, 69° ± 10° in pronation and 70° ± 8° in supination, p = 0.068.
Overall clinical and functional outcomes of this technique are satisfactory in both simple and complex fracture groups, with simple Mason II fracture group doing better than the complex three-part Mason III and IV fractures in terms of Mayo Elbow Score and range of motion. Screw fixation has the advantage of less periosteal stripping and less impingement compared to other fixation methods and also allows for flexible fixation in constrained areas. Headless compression screw fixation can be considered as a method of fracture fixation for both simple and complex three-part radial head fractures.
使用螺钉固定两部分的梅森II型桡骨头骨折正成为一种流行的做法。然而,对于三部分的梅森III型和IV型骨折,螺钉固定的疗效存在争议。本研究的目的是确定在简单、孤立的梅森II型以及复杂的三部分梅森III型和IV型桡骨头骨折中,采用统一的无头加压螺钉固定技术在功能结果、治疗效率和手术并发症评估方面的有效性。
对31例因创伤导致闭合性、非病理性梅森II型、III型和IV型桡骨头骨折的成年患者进行前瞻性评估,这些患者接受了2.0至2.5毫米的两枚或三枚空心无头加压螺钉固定,所有患者在受伤后均随访2年。他们被分为简单梅森II型骨折组和复杂的三部分梅森III - IV型骨折组。手术时间、出院时间和影像学愈合情况用作评估临床结果的参数,而梅奥肘关节功能评分、活动范围和并发症则用于评估功能结果。
确定了12例两部分简单骨折组和18例复杂骨折组。两组的平均年龄均为39岁,具有可比性。两组在愈合天数、平均住院时间和手术时间方面具有可比性。在简单骨折组中,平均梅奥肘关节评分是97分(80 - 100分),优于复杂骨折组的89分(75 - 100分),p = 0.035。两组在并发症发生率方面无统计学差异。我们系列中的所有骨折均愈合。简单骨折组的平均活动范围显著,屈伸弧为133°±17.0°,旋前和旋后分别为85°±5°,而复杂骨折组的屈伸弧为120°±20°,旋前为69°±10°,旋后为70°±8°,p = 0.068。
该技术在简单和复杂骨折组中的总体临床和功能结果均令人满意,在梅奥肘关节评分和活动范围方面,简单的梅森II型骨折组优于复杂的三部分梅森III型和IV型骨折。与其他固定方法相比,螺钉固定具有较少的骨膜剥离和较少的撞击的优点,并且在受限区域也允许灵活固定。无头加压螺钉固定可被视为简单和复杂三部分桡骨头骨折的一种骨折固定方法。