• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

机器人手臂辅助部分膝关节置换术:单中心经验

Robotic-arm assisted partial knee arthroplasty: a single centre experience.

作者信息

Marcovigi Andrea, Zambianchi Francesco, Sandoni Dario, Rivi Elisa, Catani Fabio

机构信息

.

出版信息

Acta Biomed. 2017 Jun 7;88(2S):54-59. doi: 10.23750/abm.v88i2-S.6514.

DOI:10.23750/abm.v88i2-S.6514
PMID:28657565
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6179000/
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIM OF THE WORK

UKA has proven to be an effective surgical procedure, but its survivorship is still negatively affected by inaccuracy in component component positioning, implant and limb alignment. Robotic surgery has been introduced in order to minimize such technical errors. The aim of the present paper was to evaluate clinical and surgical outcomes after a 3 years' experience of robotic assisted UKA with the Mako Robotic Arm.

METHODS

Seventy-three patients undergoing  UKA with robotic instrumentation (65 medial UKAs, 8 lateral UKAs) and with a clinical follow-up of 3 -37 months were included in the present study. A complete clinical evaluation with KOOS, FJS-12 and SF-12 was administered to all patients pre and post operatively. Post-operative HKA angle and surgical time were also recorded.

RESULTS

Mean post-operative KOOS score was 81.32 (SD 17.19), while the mean FJS-12 score was 75.51 (SD 30.12) and the mean SF-12 Physical Score 42.25 (SD 9.97). 91% to 88% of post-operative results were considered satisfactory. Only 1 UKA failure was reported (1.3%) caused by peri-prosthetic infection. In medial UKAs mean postoperative HKA angle in extension was 3.9° varus (SD 2.5°), with no case of overcorrection; in lateral UKAs mean postoperative HKA angle in extension was 1.9° valgus (SD 1.9°) with 1 case (13%) of overcorrection. Mean skin to skin surgical time decreased from 83.2 minutes (SD 13.0) to 70.0 minutes (SD 10.9) along the learning curve.

CONCLUSIONS

Robotic UKA has provided an improvement both in clinical and technical results, determining satisfactory clinical outcomes and a low risk of post-operative complications.

摘要

研究背景与目的

单髁膝关节置换术(UKA)已被证明是一种有效的外科手术,但其假体生存率仍受到组件定位不准确、植入物和肢体对线的负面影响。引入机器人手术是为了尽量减少此类技术误差。本文的目的是评估使用Mako机器人手臂进行机器人辅助UKA三年后的临床和手术结果。

方法

本研究纳入了73例行机器人辅助UKA手术的患者(65例内侧UKA,8例外侧UKA),临床随访时间为3至37个月。所有患者在术前和术后均接受了使用膝关节损伤和骨关节炎疗效评分(KOOS)、12项功能膝关节评分(FJS-12)和简明健康调查(SF-12)进行的全面临床评估。还记录了术后的股胫角(HKA)和手术时间。

结果

术后KOOS评分的平均值为81.32(标准差17.19),FJS-12评分的平均值为75.51(标准差30.12),SF-12身体评分的平均值为42.25(标准差9.97)。91%至88%的术后结果被认为是满意的。仅报告了1例UKA失败(1.3%),原因是假体周围感染。在内侧UKA中,术后伸直位的平均HKA角为内翻3.9°(标准差2.5°),无过度矫正病例;在外侧UKA中,术后伸直位的平均HKA角为外翻1.9°(标准差1.9°),有1例(13%)过度矫正。沿着学习曲线,皮肤切口至皮肤切口的平均手术时间从83.2分钟(标准差13.0)降至70.0分钟(标准差10.9)。

结论

机器人辅助UKA在临床和技术结果方面均有改善,取得了令人满意的临床效果,且术后并发症风险较低。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5915/6179000/b4c4157813b3/ACTA-88-54-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5915/6179000/b4c4157813b3/ACTA-88-54-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5915/6179000/b4c4157813b3/ACTA-88-54-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Robotic-arm assisted partial knee arthroplasty: a single centre experience.机器人手臂辅助部分膝关节置换术:单中心经验
Acta Biomed. 2017 Jun 7;88(2S):54-59. doi: 10.23750/abm.v88i2-S.6514.
2
Clinical results and short-term survivorship of robotic-arm-assisted medial and lateral unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.机器人辅助内侧和外侧单间室膝关节置换术的临床结果和短期生存率。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2020 May;28(5):1551-1559. doi: 10.1007/s00167-019-05566-4. Epub 2019 Jun 19.
3
The learning curve associated with robotic-arm assisted unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a prospective cohort study.机器人辅助单髁膝关节置换术的学习曲线:一项前瞻性队列研究。
Bone Joint J. 2018 Aug;100-B(8):1033-1042. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.100B8.BJJ-2018-0040.R1.
4
An Experienced Surgeon Can Meet or Exceed Robotic Accuracy in Manual Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty.经验丰富的外科医生在手动单髁膝关节置换术中可以达到或超过机器人的准确性。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2019 Aug 21;101(16):1479-1484. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.18.00906.
5
Better accuracy and implant survival in medial imageless robotic-assisted unicompartmental knee arthroplasty compared to conventional unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: two- to eleven-year follow-up of three hundred fifty-six consecutive knees.与传统单髁膝关节置换术相比,内侧无图像机器人辅助单髁膝关节置换术具有更高的准确性和植入物存活率:对连续356例膝关节进行2至11年的随访。
Int Orthop. 2023 Feb;47(2):533-541. doi: 10.1007/s00264-022-05640-6. Epub 2022 Nov 24.
6
Lower limb alignment control: is it more challenging in lateral compared to medial unicondylar knee arthroplasty?下肢对线控制:与内侧单髁膝关节置换术相比,外侧单髁膝关节置换术在这方面是否更具挑战性?
Knee. 2015 Sep;22(4):347-50. doi: 10.1016/j.knee.2015.02.018. Epub 2015 Mar 21.
7
Mid-term survivorship and patient-reported outcomes of robotic-arm assisted partial knee arthroplasty.机器人辅助部分膝关节置换术的中期存活率和患者报告的结果。
Bone Joint J. 2020 Jan;102-B(1):108-116. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.102B1.BJJ-2019-0510.R1.
8
Does component placement affect short-term clinical outcome in robotic-arm assisted unicompartmental knee arthroplasty?组件放置是否会影响机器人辅助单髁膝关节置换术的短期临床结果?
Bone Joint J. 2019 Apr;101-B(4):435-442. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.101B4.BJJ-2018-0753.R1.
9
Robotic arm-assisted conversion of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty to total knee arthroplasty.机器人辅助单髁膝关节置换翻修为全膝关节置换术。
Bone Joint J. 2024 Jul 1;106-B(7):680-687. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.106B7.BJJ-2023-0943.R2.
10
Outcomes of robotic-arm-assisted medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: minimum 3-year follow-up.机器人手臂辅助内侧单髁膝关节置换术的疗效:至少3年随访
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2019 Aug;29(6):1305-1311. doi: 10.1007/s00590-019-02424-4. Epub 2019 Mar 26.

引用本文的文献

1
Robotic-assisted knee replacement surgery & infection: A historical foundation, systematic review and meta-analysis.机器人辅助膝关节置换手术与感染:历史基础、系统评价与荟萃分析。
J Orthop. 2023 Apr 25;40:38-46. doi: 10.1016/j.jor.2023.04.007. eCollection 2023 Jun.
2
How reproducible are clinical measurements in robotic knee surgery?机器人膝关节手术中的临床测量可重复性如何?
J Exp Orthop. 2023 Mar 24;10(1):32. doi: 10.1186/s40634-023-00582-3.
3
Robotic-assisted unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a review.机器人辅助单髁膝关节置换术:综述

本文引用的文献

1
Survivorship and patient satisfaction of robotic-assisted medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty at a minimum two-year follow-up.机器人辅助内侧单髁膝关节置换术至少两年随访的生存率和患者满意度
Knee. 2017 Mar;24(2):419-428. doi: 10.1016/j.knee.2016.12.001. Epub 2017 Feb 6.
2
A cost comparison of unicompartmental and total knee arthroplasty.单髁膝关节置换术与全膝关节置换术的成本比较。
Knee. 2016 Dec;23(6):1016-1019. doi: 10.1016/j.knee.2015.11.012. Epub 2016 Oct 31.
3
Robotics in Arthroplasty: A Comprehensive Review.关节置换术中的机器人技术:全面综述
Arthroplasty. 2021 May 2;3(1):15. doi: 10.1186/s42836-021-00071-x.
4
New Technologies in Knee Arthroplasty: Current Concepts.膝关节置换术的新技术:当前概念
J Clin Med. 2020 Dec 25;10(1):47. doi: 10.3390/jcm10010047.
5
CORR Insights®: Valgus Correctability and Meniscal Extrusion Were Associated With Alignment After Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty.CORR见解®:单髁膝关节置换术后外翻可矫正性和半月板挤出与对线有关。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2020 Jul;478(7):1645-1647. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000001302.
6
[Research progress in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty].[单髁膝关节置换术的研究进展]
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2020 Feb 15;34(2):145-150. doi: 10.7507/1002-1892.201906085.
7
Improved implant position and lower revision rate with robotic-assisted unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.机器人辅助单髁膝关节置换术可改善植入物位置,降低翻修率。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2019 Apr;27(4):1232-1240. doi: 10.1007/s00167-018-5081-5. Epub 2018 Jul 31.
J Arthroplasty. 2016 Oct;31(10):2353-63. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2016.05.026. Epub 2016 May 18.
4
Lower limb alignment control: is it more challenging in lateral compared to medial unicondylar knee arthroplasty?下肢对线控制:与内侧单髁膝关节置换术相比,外侧单髁膝关节置换术在这方面是否更具挑战性?
Knee. 2015 Sep;22(4):347-50. doi: 10.1016/j.knee.2015.02.018. Epub 2015 Mar 21.
5
Robotic-assisted unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.机器人辅助单髁膝关节置换术
Sports Med Arthrosc Rev. 2014 Dec;22(4):219-22. doi: 10.1097/JSA.0000000000000043.
6
Assessment of accuracy of robotically assisted unicompartmental arthroplasty.机器人辅助单髁关节置换术准确性的评估
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2014 Aug;22(8):1918-25. doi: 10.1007/s00167-014-2969-6. Epub 2014 Apr 18.
7
Surgeon's experience influences UKA survivorship: a comparative study between all-poly and metal back designs.外科医生的经验影响单髁膝关节置换术的生存率:全聚乙烯和金属背衬设计的比较研究
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2015 Jul;23(7):2074-80. doi: 10.1007/s00167-014-2958-9. Epub 2014 Mar 30.
8
Robotic-assisted unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: the MAKO experience.机器人辅助单髁膝关节置换术:MAKO 经验。
Clin Sports Med. 2014 Jan;33(1):123-32. doi: 10.1016/j.csm.2013.08.007.
9
Diagnosis and indications for treatment of unicompartmental arthritis.单间室关节炎的诊断和治疗指征。
Clin Sports Med. 2014 Jan;33(1):11-21. doi: 10.1016/j.csm.2013.06.001. Epub 2013 Oct 17.
10
The Oxford unicompartmental knee fails at a high rate in a high-volume knee practice.在高容量膝关节手术中,牛津单髁膝关节置换术的失败率很高。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2013 Nov;471(11):3533-9. doi: 10.1007/s11999-013-3174-5. Epub 2013 Aug 2.