Bhandari Menal, Gandhi Ajeet Kumar, Devnani Bharti, Kumar Pavnesh, Sharma Daya Nand, Julka Pramod Kumar
Senior Resident, Department of Radiation Oncology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, Delhi, India.
Assistant Professor, Department of Radiation Oncology, Dr Ram Manohar Lohia Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India.
J Clin Diagn Res. 2017 May;11(5):XC04-XC08. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2017/27611.9945. Epub 2017 May 1.
Studies have shown promising survival with the use of Extended Temozolomide (E-TMZ) as compared to Conventional six cycles of Temozolomide (C-TMZ) in malignant gliomas; however, the reports are mostly limited to retrospective studies with significant bias.
This study assesses the impact of six versus 12 cycles of adjuvant Temozolomide (TMZ) on Overall Survival (OS) in newly diagnosed postoperative patients of Glioblastoma Multiforme (GBM).
Between January 2012 and July 2013, 40 postoperative patients of GBM between age 18-65 years and Karnofsky Performance Score (KPS) ≥70 were included. Patients were randomized to receive radiation (60 Gray in 30 fractions over six weeks) with concomitant TMZ (75 mg/m/day) and adjuvant therapy with either six (C-TMZ arm) or 12 cycles (E-TMZ arm) of TMZ (150-200 mg/m for five days, repeated four weekly). Twenty patients were treated in each arm. Toxicity was assessed using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 3.0. OS and Progression Free Survival (PFS) were calculated from the time of diagnosis. Kaplan Meier method was used for survival analysis. A p-value of <0.05 was taken as significant and SPSS version 12.0 was used for all statistical analysis.
Median number of adjuvant TMZ cycles was six and 12 in C-TMZ and E-TMZ arm respectively. Overall, 5% and 15% patients respectively in C-TMZ and E-TMZ arm had haematological toxicity ≥ 3 in grade. Median follow up in C-TMZ and E-TMZ arm were 14.65 months and 19.85 months. Median PFS was 12.8 months and 16.8 months in C-TMZ and E-TMZ arm respectively (p=0.069). Median OS was 15.4 months vs. 23.8 months in C-TMZ and E-TMZ arm respectively (p=0.044).
Our study showed that E-TMZ is well tolerated and leads to a significant increase in PFS as well as OS in newly diagnosed patients of GBM. Further prospective randomized studies are needed to validate the findings of our study.
研究表明,与传统的六个周期替莫唑胺(C-TMZ)相比,在恶性胶质瘤中使用延长替莫唑胺(E-TMZ)有较好的生存率;然而,这些报告大多限于有显著偏差的回顾性研究。
本研究评估六个周期与十二个周期辅助替莫唑胺(TMZ)对新诊断的多形性胶质母细胞瘤(GBM)术后患者总生存期(OS)的影响。
2012年1月至2013年7月,纳入40例年龄在18 - 65岁、卡氏评分(KPS)≥70的GBM术后患者。患者随机接受放疗(六周内30次分割,总量60格雷)并同步TMZ(75毫克/平方米/天),以及六个周期(C-TMZ组)或十二个周期(E-TMZ组)的TMZ辅助治疗(150 - 200毫克/平方米,连用五天,每四周重复一次)。每组治疗20例患者。使用不良事件通用术语标准(CTCAE)3.0版评估毒性。从诊断时间开始计算OS和无进展生存期(PFS)。采用Kaplan Meier方法进行生存分析。p值<0.05被视为有统计学意义,所有统计分析均使用SPSS 12.0版。
C-TMZ组和E-TMZ组辅助TMZ周期的中位数分别为六个和十二个。总体而言,C-TMZ组和E-TMZ组分别有5%和15%的患者血液学毒性≥3级。C-TMZ组和E-TMZ组的中位随访时间分别为14.65个月和19.85个月。C-TMZ组和E-TMZ组的中位PFS分别为12.8个月和16.8个月(p = 0.069)。C-TMZ组和E-TMZ组的中位OS分别为15.4个月和23.8个月(p = 0.044)。
我们的研究表明,E-TMZ耐受性良好,并能显著提高新诊断GBM患者的PFS和OS。需要进一步的前瞻性随机研究来验证我们的研究结果。