• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

常规和微波水热碳化人体生物废物以实现价值回收的比较评估。

Comparative evaluation of conventional and microwave hydrothermal carbonization of human biowaste for value recovery.

机构信息

School of Civil and Building Engineering, Loughborough University, Loughborough LE11 3TU, UK E-mail:

出版信息

Water Sci Technol. 2017 Jun;75(12):2852-2863. doi: 10.2166/wst.2017.164.

DOI:10.2166/wst.2017.164
PMID:28659525
Abstract

This paper compares conventional and microwave hydrothermal carbonization (HTC) of human biowaste (HBW) at 160 °C, 180 °C and 200 °C as a potential technology to recover valuable carbonaceous solid fuel char and organic-rich liquor. Also discussed are the influence of HTC heating methods and temperature on HBW processing conversion into solid fuel char, i.e. yield and post-HTC management, dewaterability rates, particle size distribution and the carbon and energy properties of solid fuel char. While HTC temperatures influenced all parameters investigated, especially yield and properties of end products recovered, heating source effects were noticeable on dewatering rates, char particle sizes and HBW processing/end product recovery rate and, by extension, energy consumed. The microwave process was found to be more efficient for dewatering processed HBW and for char recovery, consuming half the energy used by the conventional HTC method despite the similarity in yields, carbon and energy properties of the recovered char. However, both processes reliably overcame the heterogeneity of HBW, converting them into non-foul end products, which were easily dewatered at <3 seconds/g total solids (TS) (c.f. 50.3 seconds/g TS for a raw sample) to recover energy-densified chars of ≈17 MJ/kg calorific value and up to 1.4 g/l of ammonia concentration in recovered liquor.

摘要

本文比较了在 160°C、180°C 和 200°C 下,采用传统和微波水热碳化(HTC)技术处理人源生物废物(HBW),以回收有价值的碳质固体燃料炭和富含有机物的液体。文中还讨论了 HTC 加热方式和温度对 HBW 加工转化为固体燃料炭的影响,即产率和 HTC 后管理、脱水率、粒径分布以及固体燃料炭的碳和能量特性。虽然 HTC 温度影响所有研究参数,特别是最终产物的产率和特性,但加热源对脱水率、炭粒径以及 HBW 加工/最终产物回收率的影响更为显著,进而影响能量消耗。研究发现,微波工艺在处理 HBW 和回收炭方面更为高效,尽管两种工艺的产率、回收炭的碳和能量特性相似,但微波工艺的能耗仅为传统 HTC 方法的一半。然而,这两种工艺都可靠地克服了 HBW 的不均匀性,将其转化为不易散发异味的最终产物,易于在 <3 秒/克总固体(TS)(相比之下,原始样品为 50.3 秒/克 TS)的条件下进行脱水,从而回收出能量密集型炭,热值约为 17 MJ/kg,在回收液中可达到 1.4 克/升的氨浓度。

相似文献

1
Comparative evaluation of conventional and microwave hydrothermal carbonization of human biowaste for value recovery.常规和微波水热碳化人体生物废物以实现价值回收的比较评估。
Water Sci Technol. 2017 Jun;75(12):2852-2863. doi: 10.2166/wst.2017.164.
2
Characterization of Solid Fuel Chars recovered from Microwave Hydrothermal Carbonization of Human Biowaste.从人类生物废弃物微波水热碳化回收的固体燃料炭的表征
Energy (Oxf). 2017;134:74-89. doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2017.06.010. Epub 2017 Jun 4.
3
Uncovering the transition between hydrothermal carbonization and liquefaction via secondary char extraction: A case study using food waste.通过二次炭提取揭示水热碳化与液化之间的转变:以食物垃圾为例的研究。
Waste Manag. 2023 Aug 1;168:281-289. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2023.06.009. Epub 2023 Jun 15.
4
Optimization and characterization of hydrochar produced from microwave hydrothermal carbonization of fish waste.鱼废料微波水热碳化制备水焦的优化与表征
Waste Manag. 2017 Jul;65:159-168. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2017.04.016. Epub 2017 Apr 12.
5
Hydrothermal carbonization of waste from leather processing and feasibility of produced hydrochar as an alternative solid fuel.皮革加工废物的水热碳化及所产水炭作为替代固体燃料的可行性。
J Environ Manage. 2019 Oct 1;247:115-120. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.06.067. Epub 2019 Jun 21.
6
Comparative Investigation of the Physicochemical Properties of Chars Produced by Hydrothermal Carbonization, Pyrolysis, and Microwave-Induced Pyrolysis of Food Waste.水热碳化、热解和微波诱导热解食物垃圾产生的炭的物理化学性质的对比研究
Polymers (Basel). 2022 Feb 20;14(4):821. doi: 10.3390/polym14040821.
7
Hydrothermal carbonization and torrefaction of grape pomace: a comparative evaluation.葡萄渣的水热碳化和热解:比较评估。
Bioresour Technol. 2014 Jun;161:255-62. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2014.03.052. Epub 2014 Mar 21.
8
Effects of hydrolysis and carbonization reactions on hydrochar production.水解和碳化反应对水热炭生成的影响。
Bioresour Technol. 2015 Sep;192:328-34. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2015.05.091. Epub 2015 May 29.
9
Conversion of heavy metal-containing biowaste from phytoremediation site to value-added solid fuel through hydrothermal carbonization.通过水热碳化将植物修复场地含重金属的生物废物转化为增值固体燃料。
Environ Pollut. 2021 Jan 15;269:116127. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2020.116127. Epub 2020 Nov 26.
10
Thermal conversion of municipal solid waste via hydrothermal carbonization: comparison of carbonization products to products from current waste management techniques.市政固体废物的水热碳化热转化:碳化产物与当前废物管理技术产物的比较。
Waste Manag. 2012 Jul;32(7):1353-65. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2012.02.012. Epub 2012 Apr 17.

引用本文的文献

1
Hydrothermal carbonization as an alternative sanitation technology: process optimization and development of low-cost reactor.水热碳化作为一种替代性卫生技术:工艺优化与低成本反应器的开发
Open Res Eur. 2022 Jun 10;1:139. doi: 10.12688/openreseurope.14306.2. eCollection 2021.
2
Characterization of Solid Fuel Chars recovered from Microwave Hydrothermal Carbonization of Human Biowaste.从人类生物废弃物微波水热碳化回收的固体燃料炭的表征
Energy (Oxf). 2017;134:74-89. doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2017.06.010. Epub 2017 Jun 4.