Suppr超能文献

腿正压 maneuvers 在症状性重度主动脉瓣狭窄患者等待主动脉瓣介入治疗时的急性前负荷超声心动图具有显著的预后价值。

Significant Prognostic Value of Acute Preload Stress Echocardiography Using Leg-Positive Pressure Maneuver for Patients With Symptomatic Severe Aortic Stenosis Awaiting Aortic Valve Intervention.

机构信息

Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine.

Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Tokushima University Hospital.

出版信息

Circ J. 2017 Nov 24;81(12):1927-1935. doi: 10.1253/circj.CJ-17-0143. Epub 2017 Jun 28.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Although aortic valve intervention is recommended for virtually all symptomatic patients with aortic stenosis (AS), how urgently the intervention should be performed remains controversial. The aim of this study was thus to determine whether the preload reserve in response to leg-positive pressure (LPP) maneuver could serve for decision-making for AS patients awaiting aortic valve intervention.Methods and Results:Sixty-eight patients with symptomatic AS, who were referred for aortic valve intervention, were recruited. Stroke volume (SV) was assessed by means of pulsed-wave Doppler, and the ratio between transmitral E wave and mitral annular velocity (e') was calculated to estimate ventricular filling pressure. While waiting for intervention, 11 patients experienced preoperative cardiac events. During acute preload stress, forward SV for patients without cardiac events increased significantly (from 43±9 to 49±10 mL/m, P<0.01) along with a minimal change in filling pressure (E/e': from 20±8 to 21±9, NS). For patients with cardiac events, the Frank-Starling mechanism was significantly impaired (SVi: from 40±9 to 38±7 mL/m, NS), while filling pressure increased to the critical level (E/e': from 24±8 to 31±8, P<0.001). Both the patients without flow reserve (∆SVi <4.5 mL/m) and those without diastolic reserve (∆E/e' ≥2.9) exhibited significantly worse event-free survival than the others (P<0.05, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Assessment of preload reserve during LPP stress could facilitate risk stratification of patients with severe AS waiting for aortic valve intervention.

摘要

背景

尽管主动脉瓣介入治疗几乎适用于所有有症状的主动脉瓣狭窄(AS)患者,但介入治疗的紧迫性仍存在争议。因此,本研究旨在确定腿部正压(LPP)操作的前负荷储备是否可用于决定等待主动脉瓣介入治疗的 AS 患者。

方法和结果

共纳入 68 例有症状的 AS 患者,这些患者被转诊接受主动脉瓣介入治疗。采用脉冲波多普勒测量每搏量(SV),并计算二尖瓣环速度(e')与二尖瓣前向血流 E 波的比值以估计心室充盈压。在等待介入治疗期间,11 例患者发生术前心脏事件。在急性前负荷应激期间,无心脏事件的患者的前向 SV 显著增加(从 43±9 增加到 49±10 mL/m,P<0.01),而充盈压几乎没有变化(E/e':从 20±8 增加到 21±9,NS)。对于有心脏事件的患者,Frank-Starling 机制明显受损(SVi:从 40±9 减少到 38±7 mL/m,NS),而充盈压增加到临界水平(E/e':从 24±8 增加到 31±8,P<0.001)。没有流量储备(SVi 的变化<4.5 mL/m)和没有舒张储备(E/e' 的变化≥2.9)的患者的无事件生存显著低于其他患者(分别为 P<0.05)。

结论

在 LPP 应激期间评估前负荷储备可以帮助为等待主动脉瓣介入治疗的严重 AS 患者进行风险分层。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验