Suppr超能文献

是否存在自身受体对神经递质释放的反馈调节?

Is there feedback regulation of neurotransmitter release by autoreceptors?

作者信息

Kalsner S

出版信息

Biochem Pharmacol. 1985 Dec 1;34(23):4085-97. doi: 10.1016/0006-2952(85)90199-6.

Abstract

Neurotransmitter release does not seem to be regulated by neuronal receptors mediating feedback and the mechanism of action of presynaptically active agents is still uncertain. In a recent set of papers [27, 82], experiments were described in which major modifications were made to the amount of neurotransmitter released per impulse, with all other parameters of field stimulation, such as pulse number, voltage and frequency, fully controlled. These studies done with a number of sympathetically innervated tissues give some insight into an antagonist action presynaptically which is independent of the ambient concentration of extracellular transmitter. It appears to involve, instead, the gating mechanisms which control neuronal membrane depolarization and repolarization. It was found that the effects of yohimbine and also of phenoxybenzamine on stimulation-induced efflux appeared to be essentially "all or none". That is, the absolute total release of tritiated transmitter with 100 pulses was elevated to roughly the same dpm value by the presynaptic antagonist at each of the pulse durations between 50 and 1000 microsec, in a variety of test tissues. The declining percentage effect of the antagonist on tritium efflux, as the pulse duration was enlarged between 50 and 1000 microsec, referred to earlier (Fig. 3), was due to rising values for transmitter release in the controls not matched by proportionally similar increases in the antagonist-treated tissues. Values for the amount of transmitter released during stimulation in the presence of yohimbine, at pulse lengths between 50 and 1000 microsec, were all in the range of values achieved in the absence of yohimbine with long pulse lengths (1000-2000 microsec). In other words, prolongation of the pulse duration from 50 to 1000 microsec and the exposure of tissues to a presynaptic antagonist, such as yohimbine or phenoxybenzamine, may involve a common mechanism, and the effects of these two procedures are not additive. In fact, with much prolonged pulse durations (2000-5000 microsec), the presynaptic antagonists are virtually ineffective. It is known that the release of transmitter from sympathetic nerves is directly related to the duration of the action potential. If it is prolonged, the calcium channels stay open longer leading to greater entry of calcium and to an increased release of transmitter [45, 46]. Yohimbine and phenoxybenzamine may prolong the duration of depolarization by indirect modification of the calcium gating mechanism.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

摘要

神经递质的释放似乎不受介导反馈的神经元受体调控,且突触前活性药物的作用机制仍不明确。在最近的一组论文[27, 82]中,描述了一些实验,其中对每个冲动释放的神经递质数量进行了重大改变,同时对场刺激的所有其他参数,如脉冲数、电压和频率,进行了完全控制。这些对多种受交感神经支配组织进行的研究,让人对突触前的拮抗作用有了一些了解,这种作用独立于细胞外递质的周围浓度。相反,它似乎涉及控制神经元膜去极化和复极化的门控机制。研究发现,育亨宾和酚苄明对刺激诱导的外流的影响似乎基本上是“全或无”的。也就是说,在50至1000微秒的每个脉冲持续时间下,在各种测试组织中,突触前拮抗剂将100个脉冲的氚标记递质的绝对总释放量提高到大致相同的每分钟衰变数(dpm)值。如前所述(图3),随着脉冲持续时间在50至1000微秒之间增大,拮抗剂对氚外流的百分比效应下降,这是由于对照中递质释放值上升,而拮抗剂处理的组织中没有成比例的类似增加。在育亨宾存在的情况下,在50至1000微秒的脉冲长度下刺激期间释放的递质数量值,都在没有育亨宾且脉冲长度较长(1000 - 2000微秒)时所达到的值范围内。换句话说,将脉冲持续时间从50延长至1000微秒以及使组织暴露于突触前拮抗剂,如育亨宾或酚苄明,可能涉及一种共同机制,并且这两种操作的效果并非相加的。实际上,在脉冲持续时间大大延长(2000 - 5000微秒)时,突触前拮抗剂几乎无效。已知交感神经递质的释放与动作电位的持续时间直接相关。如果动作电位延长,钙通道保持开放的时间更长,导致更多的钙内流,从而使递质释放增加[45, 46]。育亨宾和酚苄明可能通过间接改变钙门控机制来延长去极化的持续时间。(摘要截选至400字)

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验