Enhancing the quality and transparency of reporting.
出版信息
Nat Cell Biol. 2017 Jun 29;19(7):741. doi: 10.1038/ncb3571.
DOI:10.1038/ncb3571
PMID:28659640
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Enhancing the quality and transparency of reporting.提高报告的质量和透明度。
Nat Cell Biol. 2017 Jun 29;19(7):741. doi: 10.1038/ncb3571.
2
[Not Available].[无可用内容]
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2017 Oct;126:94-95. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2017.09.007. Epub 2017 Oct 11.
3
Suggestions for authors of medical articles.给医学文章作者的建议。
Arq Neuropsiquiatr. 2017 Feb;75(2):114-116. doi: 10.1590/0004-282X20160197.
4
Qualitative research: methods, tools, analysis.定性研究：方法、工具与分析
Tunis Med. 2020 Feb;98(2):110-115.
5
[Writing to publish, a barrier to French medical research?].[撰写论文以发表，法国医学研究的一个障碍？]
Rev Med Interne. 2019 Feb;40(2):67-69. doi: 10.1016/j.revmed.2018.04.010. Epub 2018 May 4.
6
Some rules for writing medical articles for peer-reviewed journals.撰写同行评审期刊医学文章的一些规则。
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2015 May;97(4):252-4. doi: 10.1308/003588415X14181254790167.
7
The whole story I--mysteries. By Caveman.整个故事——谜团。作者：穴居人。
J Cell Sci. 2014 Jul 15;127(Pt 14):2995-6. doi: 10.1242/jcs.157727.
8
Writing the Discussion Section: Describing the Significance of the Study Findings.撰写讨论部分：描述研究结果的意义。
J Assoc Physicians India. 2015 Nov;63(11):40-2.
9
All Plagiarism Is Not Alike.并非所有抄袭行为都相同。
World Neurosurg. 2016 Mar;87:xviii. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2016.01.046. Epub 2016 Jan 29.
10
Professional medical writing support and the quality of randomised controlled trial reporting: a cross-sectional study.专业医学写作支持与随机对照试验报告质量：一项横断面研究。
BMJ Open. 2016 Feb 21;6(2):e010329. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010329.
引用本文的文献
1
Principles of refereeing.
Nat Cell Biol. 2017 Aug 31;19(9):1005. doi: 10.1038/ncb3606.
本文引用的文献
1
On data availability, reproducibility and reuse.关于数据的可用性、可重复性和再利用。
Nat Cell Biol. 2017 Mar 31;19(4):259. doi: 10.1038/ncb3506.
Zotero 插件