Klaus Katharina, Heumann Christian, Ruf Sabine
Department of Orthodontics, Justus-Liebig-University Gießen, Schlangenzahl 14, 35392, Gießen, Germany.
Department of Statistics, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Ludwigstraße 33, 80539, Munich, Germany.
J Orofac Orthop. 2017 Nov;78(6):472-479. doi: 10.1007/s00056-017-0099-8. Epub 2017 Jun 28.
To measure the effect of orthognathic surgery on Class II:1 profile silhouette esthetics and to identify pretreatment parameters and thresholds for consistent esthetic improvement.
Pre- and posttreatment black profile silhouettes of 20 patients with Class II:1 malocclusion who had received combined orthodontic/orthognathic treatment were evaluated retrospectively by 20 European orthodontists and laypeople each using a visual analogue scale (VAS). A variety of pretreatment skeletal and facial angles were measured cephalometrically and on the silhouette profiles. Descriptive statistics and Pearson's correlation coefficients were calculated.
The population showed a mean VAS improvement of 12.6%. VAS changes were significantly and directly related to pretreatment ANB in all evaluator groups (r = 0.48-0.59), whereas the interrelation with the degree of pretreatment profile convexity angle was less clear and statistically significant for the orthodontic evaluators only (r = -0.34 to -0.51). The highest correlation coefficients in all evaluator groups were seen for the relationship with pretreatment VAS scores (r = -0.64 to -0.73).
The lower the pretreatment VAS score and the profile convexity angles or the larger the pretreatment ANB angles were, the more the VAS improved. Pretreatment thresholds for consistent improvements were as follows: VAS score < 20 mm, ANB > 8°, and profile angle ≤ 155°.
测量正颌手术对安氏II类1分类面型侧貌美学的影响,并确定可实现持续美学改善的治疗前参数及阈值。
回顾性评估20例接受正畸/正颌联合治疗的安氏II类1分类错牙合患者治疗前、后的黑色侧貌剪影,由20名欧洲正畸医生和普通民众分别使用视觉模拟量表(VAS)进行评价。通过头影测量法测量多种治疗前骨骼和面部角度,并在侧貌剪影上进行测量。计算描述性统计量和Pearson相关系数。
总体VAS改善均值为12.6%。在所有评估组中,VAS变化均与治疗前ANB呈显著正相关(r = 0.48 - 0.59),而与治疗前侧貌凸度角的相关性仅在正畸医生评估组中不太明确且具有统计学意义(r = -0.34至-0.51)。所有评估组中,与治疗前VAS评分的相关性系数最高(r = -0.64至-0.73)。
治疗前VAS评分、侧貌凸度角越低,或治疗前ANB角越大,VAS改善越明显。持续改善的治疗前阈值如下:VAS评分<20 mm,ANB>8°,侧貌角≤155°。