Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Can J Diabetes. 2018 Apr;42(2):158-162. doi: 10.1016/j.jcjd.2017.05.003. Epub 2017 Jun 26.
Diabetes is often poorly managed in hospitals. This study assessed the level of adherence to current Canadian practice guidelines for inpatient pharmacologic management of type 2 diabetes and whether it affected the frequency of hyperglycemia or hypoglycemia.
Retrospectively, we assessed the first 3 days of routine inpatient capillary blood glucose measurement (CBGM) records for hyperglycemia (>8 mmol/L fasting, >10 mmol/L nonfasting) and hypoglycemia (<4 mmol/L) in adults with drug-treated type 2 diabetes admitted to internal medicine without metabolic decompensation or nil per os (NPO) status at 2 hospitals during October through December 2014. Patients, divided according to their admission orders into guideline-adherent versus guideline-nonadherent groups were compared for frequency of hyperglycemia and hypoglycemia. Factors predicting guideline adherence were assessed.
Of 150 patients with diabetes who were admitted, 108 met entry criteria. A total of 89 patients received guideline-based care (82%), whereas 19 patients did not (18%). Charlson index and preadmission medications did not predict guideline-based care, but admitting physicians' seniority did (junior, senior resident, attending physician; p=0.05). In the adherent group, 43% of CBGMs were hyperglycemic, versus 64% in the nonadherent group (p=0.01). For hypoglycemia, proportions were 2% versus 1%, respectively (p=0.21).
Adherence to guidelines for inpatient type 2 diabetes management is good and may be greater with more training. Hyperglycemia was more common in patients who did not receive guideline-based care. Hypoglycemia was uncommon and did not appear to be more common in the guideline-adherent group, although numbers were small. These results may alleviate physicians' fear that providing adequate insulin to hospitalized patients may cause hypoglycemia.
医院中糖尿病的管理通常较差。本研究评估了住院患者 2 型糖尿病药物治疗管理中遵循当前加拿大实践指南的程度,以及其是否影响高血糖或低血糖的发生频率。
回顾性评估了 2014 年 10 月至 12 月期间,2 家医院内科收治的无代谢性失代偿或禁食(NPO)状态的药物治疗 2 型糖尿病成人患者入院后前 3 天的常规毛细血管血糖测量(CBGM)记录,以评估高血糖(空腹>8mmol/L,非空腹>10mmol/L)和低血糖(<4mmol/L)的发生频率。根据入院医嘱,将患者分为符合指南组和不符合指南组,比较两组高血糖和低血糖的发生频率。评估了预测指南依从性的因素。
在 150 例患有糖尿病的入院患者中,有 108 例符合纳入标准。共有 89 例患者接受了基于指南的治疗(82%),而 19 例患者未接受(18%)。Charlson 指数和入院前用药并不能预测基于指南的治疗,但入院医生的职称可以预测(初级住院医师、高级住院医师、主治医生;p=0.05)。在符合指南组中,43%的 CBGM 出现高血糖,而不符合指南组中为 64%(p=0.01)。对于低血糖,比例分别为 2%和 1%(p=0.21)。
住院 2 型糖尿病管理指南的依从性良好,且可能随着培训的增加而提高。未接受基于指南的治疗的患者更易出现高血糖。低血糖并不常见,且似乎在符合指南组中并不更常见,尽管数量较少。这些结果可能减轻了医生对给住院患者提供足够胰岛素可能导致低血糖的担忧。