Yazbeck Batoul, Boutron Isabelle, Porcher Raphaël, Riveros Carolina, Ravaud Philippe, Yaacoub Sally
Center for Research in Epidemiology and Statistics (CRESS), Université Paris Cité and Université Sorbonne Paris Nord, Inserm, INRAE, Paris, F-75004, France.
Centre d'Épidémiologie Clinique, Hôpital Hôtel Dieu AP-HP, 1 Parvis de Notre Dame, Paris, 75004, France.
BMC Med. 2025 Aug 4;23(1):454. doi: 10.1186/s12916-025-04257-x.
Ensuring adherence to clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) is critical for improving patient outcomes. However, how the impact of guideline adherence on clinical outcomes is studied remains unclear. Our objectives are (1) to identify studies that assess the impact of adherence to CPGs; (2) to describe the research questions of these studies; and (3) to describe their study designs, methods, and reporting. We focused on CPGs addressing the pharmacologic management of major chronic diseases, specifically musculoskeletal diseases (rheumatoid arthritis, osteoarthritis, axial spondyloarthritis, and psoriatic arthritis), diabetes, and hypertension.
We conducted a scoping review. We searched PubMed on March 3, 2023, for studies published since 2013. We included studies assessing the impact of adherence to CPGs for the pharmacologic management of adult patients. One reviewer screened the titles and abstracts and full texts and a second reviewer independently screened 20%. Two reviewers independently extracted data using a standardized pilot-tested data extraction form. Data were analyzed descriptively.
Of 7952 records retrieved, 16 studies were eligible for inclusion. The studies addressed CPGs for the management of diabetes (n = 8), hypertension (n = 6), and axial spondyloarthritis (n = 2). All studies were cohort studies, but none emulated a target trial. The median number of participants analyzed was 511 (IQR 350; 10,536) and the median follow-up time was 9 months (IQR 4; 18). Four studies explicitly reported the recommendations for which the impact of adherence was assessed, nine precisely defined adherence, and eight studies evaluated only surrogate outcomes. Thirteen studies accounted for confounding factors. There was serious or critical risk of bias in selection of participants in 13 studies.
The impact of adherence to clinical practice guidelines is rarely and inadequately evaluated. Future research should employ rigorous study designs and reporting standards to generate more reliable insights into the impact of CPG adherence.
确保遵循临床实践指南(CPG)对于改善患者结局至关重要。然而,目前尚不清楚如何研究指南遵循对临床结局的影响。我们的目标是:(1)识别评估遵循CPG影响的研究;(2)描述这些研究的研究问题;(3)描述其研究设计、方法和报告情况。我们重点关注针对主要慢性病药物治疗管理的CPG,特别是肌肉骨骼疾病(类风湿关节炎、骨关节炎、中轴型脊柱关节炎和银屑病关节炎)、糖尿病和高血压。
我们进行了一项范围综述。于2023年3月3日在PubMed上检索自2013年以来发表的研究。我们纳入评估遵循CPG对成年患者药物治疗管理影响的研究。一名审阅者筛选标题、摘要和全文,另一名审阅者独立筛选20%。两名审阅者使用经过标准化预测试的数据提取表独立提取数据。对数据进行描述性分析。
在检索到的7952条记录中,16项研究符合纳入标准。这些研究涉及糖尿病(n = 8)、高血压(n = 6)和中轴型脊柱关节炎(n = 2)管理的CPG。所有研究均为队列研究,但均未模拟目标试验。分析的参与者中位数为511(四分位间距350;10536),中位随访时间为9个月(四分位间距4;18)。四项研究明确报告了评估遵循影响的建议,九项精确界定了遵循情况,八项研究仅评估了替代结局。十三项研究考虑了混杂因素。13项研究在参与者选择方面存在严重或关键的偏倚风险。
对遵循临床实践指南的影响评估很少且不充分。未来的研究应采用严谨的研究设计和报告标准,以更可靠地洞察CPG遵循的影响。