Kang Kyung-Won, Kim Woo-Young, Kim Tae-Hun, Shin Byung-Cheul, Jung So-Young, Kim Ae-Ran, Choi Sun-Mi
Department of Medical Research, Korea Institute of Oriental Medicine, Yuseong-gu, Daejeon, Korea.
Oriental Medical Clinic, Hanaro-Dongguk University, Seoul, Korea.
Integr Med Res. 2012 Dec;1(1):36-40. doi: 10.1016/j.imr.2012.09.004. Epub 2012 Oct 16.
The objectives of this study were to compare the efficacy of acupuncture among different types and to evaluate point-selective pain relief effects between selected adjacent or distant points in participants with temporomandibular joint disorders (TMDs).
Forty-two participants were randomly allocated to three groups: an adjacent point selection group (Trt, = 14), a distant point selection group (Con1, = 14), or a combination group (Con2, = 14). All three groups received a total of six acupuncture sessions (twice a week for 3 weeks), the outcomes being assessed pain intensity using a 10-cm visual analogue scale, and the palpation index of the muscle and temporomandibular joint every week of treatment and 4 weeks after the end of treatment.
The pain intensity was reduced in the Trt (34%), Con1 (31%), and Con2 (36%) groups after 3 weeks compared with each group's baseline, with no significant difference among the three groups ( = 0.5867). Similarly, the palpation index was decreased by 52% (Trt), 62% (Con1), and 50% (Con2) after 3 weeks of treatment, but no significant differences between groups were shown ( = 0.3289).
Our results suggest that point-selective effects among adjacent, distal, or a combination of acupoints are hardly associated with pain intensity or palpation index in participants with TMDs. Larger sample size trials are required to overcome the shortcomings of the study.
本研究的目的是比较不同类型针灸的疗效,并评估颞下颌关节紊乱症(TMDs)患者中所选相邻或远端穴位之间的穴位选择性疼痛缓解效果。
42名参与者被随机分为三组:相邻穴位选择组(Trt,n = 14)、远端穴位选择组(Con1,n = 14)或联合组(Con2,n = 14)。所有三组均接受总共六次针灸治疗(每周两次,共3周),使用10厘米视觉模拟量表评估疼痛强度,并在治疗的每周以及治疗结束后4周评估肌肉和颞下颌关节的触诊指数。
与每组的基线相比,3周后Trt组(34%)、Con1组(31%)和Con2组(36%)的疼痛强度均有所降低,三组之间无显著差异(P = 0.5867)。同样,治疗3周后,触诊指数分别下降了52%(Trt)、62%(Con1)和50%(Con2),但组间无显著差异(P = 0.3289)。
我们的结果表明,在TMDs患者中,相邻、远端或穴位组合的穴位选择性效应与疼痛强度或触诊指数几乎没有关联。需要更大样本量的试验来克服本研究的不足。