Suppr超能文献

脊髓性肌萎缩症患者对基因筛查的损伤体验、身份认同及态度

Impairment Experiences, Identity and Attitudes Towards Genetic Screening: the Views of People with Spinal Muscular Atrophy.

作者信息

Boardman Felicity K, Young Philip J, Griffiths Frances E

机构信息

Division of Health Sciences, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK.

School of Life Sciences, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK.

出版信息

J Genet Couns. 2018 Feb;27(1):69-84. doi: 10.1007/s10897-017-0122-7. Epub 2017 Jun 30.

Abstract

Developments in genetics are rapidly changing the capacity and scope of screening practices. However, people with genetic conditions have been under-represented in the literature exploring their implications. This mixed methods study explores the attitudes of people with Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA) towards three different population-level genetic screening programmes for SMA: pre-conception, prenatal and newborn screening. Drawing on qualitative interviews (n = 15) and a survey (n = 82), this study demonstrates that more severely affected individuals with early-onset symptoms (Type II SMA), are less likely to support screening and more likely to view SMA positively than those with milder, later onset and/or fluctuating symptoms (Types III/ IV SMA). Indeed, this clinically milder group were more likely to support all forms of screening and view SMA negatively. This paper highlights that screening is a complex issue for people with genetic conditions, and the nature of impairment experiences plays a critical role in shaping attitudes.

摘要

遗传学的发展正在迅速改变筛查实践的能力和范围。然而,在探讨其影响的文献中,患有遗传疾病的人所占比例一直较低。这项混合方法研究探讨了脊髓性肌萎缩症(SMA)患者对三种不同的SMA人群水平基因筛查项目的态度:孕前筛查、产前筛查和新生儿筛查。通过定性访谈(n = 15)和一项调查(n = 82),本研究表明,与症状较轻、发病较晚和/或症状波动的患者(III/IV型SMA)相比,症状早发的重症患者(II型SMA)支持筛查的可能性较小,对SMA持积极看法的可能性更大。事实上,临床症状较轻的这组患者更有可能支持所有形式的筛查,并对SMA持负面看法。本文强调,筛查对患有遗传疾病的人来说是一个复杂的问题,损伤经历的性质在塑造态度方面起着关键作用。

相似文献

6
A Review on Spinal Muscular Atrophy: Awareness, Knowledge, and Attitudes.脊髓性肌萎缩症综述:认知、知识与态度
J Genet Couns. 2016 Oct;25(5):892-900. doi: 10.1007/s10897-016-9955-8. Epub 2016 Apr 16.

引用本文的文献

7
Human genome editing and the identity politics of genetic disability.人类基因组编辑与遗传残疾的身份政治
J Community Genet. 2020 Apr;11(2):125-127. doi: 10.1007/s12687-019-00437-4. Epub 2019 Sep 6.

本文引用的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验