• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

超变焦波束形成技术对人工耳蜗使用者噪声环境下的益处。

Benefit of the UltraZoom beamforming technology in noise in cochlear implant users.

作者信息

Mosnier Isabelle, Mathias Nathalie, Flament Jonathan, Amar Dorith, Liagre-Callies Amelie, Borel Stephanie, Ambert-Dahan Emmanuèle, Sterkers Olivier, Bernardeschi Daniele

机构信息

Sorbonne Universités, Université Pierre et Marie Curie Paris 6, Inserm, Unité Réhabilitation chirurgicale mini-invasive et robotisée de l'audition, Paris, France.

AP-HP, Groupe Hospitalier Universitaire Pitié-Salpêtrière, Service ORL, Otologie, implants auditifs et chirurgie de la base du crâne, 47-83 Boulevard de l'Hôpital, 75651, Paris Cedex 13, France.

出版信息

Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2017 Sep;274(9):3335-3342. doi: 10.1007/s00405-017-4651-3. Epub 2017 Jun 29.

DOI:10.1007/s00405-017-4651-3
PMID:28664331
Abstract

The objectives of the study were to demonstrate the audiological and subjective benefits of the adaptive UltraZoom beamforming technology available in the Naída CI Q70 sound processor, in cochlear-implanted adults upgraded from a previous generation sound processor. Thirty-four adults aged between 21 and 89 years (mean 53 ± 19) were prospectively included. Nine subjects were unilaterally implanted, 11 bilaterally and 14 were bimodal users. The mean duration of cochlear implant use was 7 years (range 5-15 years). Subjects were tested in quiet with monosyllabic words and in noise with the adaptive French Matrix test in the best-aided conditions. The test setup contained a signal source in front of the subject and three noise sources at +/-90° and 180°. The noise was presented at a fixed level of 65 dB SPL and the level of speech signal was varied to obtain the speech reception threshold (SRT). During the upgrade visit, subjects were tested with the Harmony and with the Naída CI sound processors in omnidirectional microphone configuration. After a take-home phase of 2 months, tests were repeated with the Naída CI processor with and without UltraZoom. Subjective assessment of the sound quality in daily environments was recorded using the APHAB questionnaire. No difference in performance was observed in quiet between the two processors. The Matrix test in noise was possible in the 21 subjects with the better performance. No difference was observed between the two processors for performance in noise when using the omnidirectional microphone. At the follow-up session, the median SRT with the Naída CI processor with UltraZoom was -4 dB compared to -0.45 dB without UltraZoom. The use of UltraZoom improved the median SRT by 3.6 dB (p < 0.0001, Wilcoxon paired test). When looking at the APHAB outcome, improvement was observed for speech understanding in noisy environments (p < 0.01) and in aversive situations (p < 0.05) in the group of 21 subjects who were able to perform the Matrix test in noise and for speech understanding in noise (p < 0.05) in the group of 13 subjects with the poorest performance, who were not able to perform the Matrix test in noise. The use of UltraZoom beamforming technology, available on the new sound processor Naída CI, improves speech performance in difficult and realistic noisy conditions when the cochlear implant user needs to focus on the person speaking at the front. Using the APHAB questionnaire, a subjective benefit for listening in background noise was also observed in subjects with good performance as well as in those with poor performance. This study highlighted the importance of upgrading CI recipients to new technology and to include assessment in noise and subjective feedback evaluation as part of the process.

摘要

本研究的目的是证明奈达CI Q70声音处理器中可用的自适应超变焦波束形成技术,对于从先前一代声音处理器升级而来的成人人工耳蜗植入者在听力学和主观方面的益处。前瞻性纳入了34名年龄在21至89岁之间(平均53±19岁)的成年人。9名受试者为单侧植入,11名双侧植入,14名为双模式使用者。人工耳蜗使用的平均时长为7年(范围5 - 15年)。受试者在安静环境下使用单音节词进行测试,在噪声环境下使用自适应法语矩阵测试,测试条件为最佳助听条件。测试装置包括一个位于受试者前方的信号源和三个位于±90°和180°的噪声源。噪声以65 dB SPL的固定水平呈现,语音信号的水平则有所变化以获得言语接受阈值(SRT)。在升级访问期间,受试者分别使用Harmony和奈达CI声音处理器的全向麦克风配置进行测试。在为期2个月的带回家测试阶段后,再次使用奈达CI处理器在开启和关闭超变焦功能的情况下进行测试。使用APHAB问卷记录在日常环境中对声音质量的主观评估。在安静环境下,未观察到两种处理器在性能上的差异。在21名表现较好的受试者中,可以进行噪声环境下的矩阵测试。在使用全向麦克风时,未观察到两种处理器在噪声环境下的性能差异。在随访阶段,使用带有超变焦功能的奈达CI处理器时的SRT中位数为 - 4 dB,而不使用超变焦功能时为 - 0.45 dB。使用超变焦功能使SRT中位数提高了3.6 dB(p < 0.0001,Wilcoxon配对检验)。在能够进行噪声环境下矩阵测试的21名受试者组中,观察到在嘈杂环境中的言语理解(p < 0.01)和厌恶情境中的言语理解(p < 0.05)有所改善;在13名表现最差、无法进行噪声环境下矩阵测试的受试者组中,观察到在噪声中的言语理解(p < 0.05)有所改善。新的奈达CI声音处理器上可用的超变焦波束形成技术,在人工耳蜗植入者需要专注于前方说话者时,可改善在困难和现实嘈杂条件下的言语表现。使用APHAB问卷,在表现良好的受试者以及表现较差的受试者中,均观察到在背景噪声中聆听的主观益处。本研究强调了将人工耳蜗植入者升级到新技术的重要性,并将噪声评估和主观反馈评估纳入该过程。

相似文献

1
Benefit of the UltraZoom beamforming technology in noise in cochlear implant users.超变焦波束形成技术对人工耳蜗使用者噪声环境下的益处。
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2017 Sep;274(9):3335-3342. doi: 10.1007/s00405-017-4651-3. Epub 2017 Jun 29.
2
Speech reception threshold benefits in cochlear implant users with an adaptive beamformer in real life situations.在现实生活中,使用自适应波束形成器的人工耳蜗使用者的言语接受阈益处。
Cochlear Implants Int. 2015 Mar;16(2):69-76. doi: 10.1179/1754762814Y.0000000088. Epub 2014 Jul 3.
3
Effect of Microphone Configuration and Sound Source Location on Speech Recognition for Adult Cochlear Implant Users with Current-Generation Sound Processors.麦克风配置和声源位置对使用新一代电流型处理器的成人人工耳蜗植入者言语识别的影响。
J Am Acad Audiol. 2020 Sep;31(8):578-589. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1709449. Epub 2020 Apr 27.
4
Effect of Microphone Location and Beamforming Technology on Speech Recognition in Pediatric Cochlear Implant Recipients.麦克风位置和波束成形技术对儿童人工耳蜗植入者言语识别的影响。
J Am Acad Audiol. 2020 Jul;31(7):506-512. doi: 10.3766/jaaa.19025. Epub 2020 Sep 2.
5
Benefit of a commercially available cochlear implant processor with dual-microphone beamforming: a multi-center study.商业化的具备双麦克风波束成形功能的人工耳蜗处理器的优势:一项多中心研究。
Otol Neurotol. 2012 Jun;33(4):553-60. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0b013e31825367a5.
6
Hearing performance in single-sided deaf cochlear implant users after upgrade to a single-unit speech processor.升级为单通道言语处理器后单侧耳聋人工耳蜗使用者的听力表现
Otol Neurotol. 2015 Jan;36(1):51-60. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000000653.
7
Speech understanding in noise with the Roger Pen, Naida CI Q70 processor, and integrated Roger 17 receiver in a multi-talker network.在多说话者网络中,使用罗杰笔、奈达CI Q70处理器和集成式罗杰17接收器进行噪声环境下的言语理解。
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2016 May;273(5):1107-14. doi: 10.1007/s00405-015-3643-4. Epub 2015 May 16.
8
Evaluation of a New Algorithm to Optimize Audibility in Cochlear Implant Recipients.评估一种优化人工耳蜗植入者可听度的新算法。
Ear Hear. 2019 Jul/Aug;40(4):990-1000. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000680.
9
A multicentre clinical evaluation of paediatric cochlear implant users upgrading to the Nucleus(®) 6 system.对升级至Nucleus(®) 6系统的儿科人工耳蜗使用者的多中心临床评估。
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2016 Apr;83:193-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2016.02.004. Epub 2016 Feb 21.
10
Benefits of bilateral electrical stimulation with the nucleus cochlear implant in adults: 6-month postoperative results.成人人工耳蜗植入双侧电刺激的益处:术后6个月结果
Otol Neurotol. 2004 Nov;25(6):958-68. doi: 10.1097/00129492-200411000-00016.

引用本文的文献

1
Value of patient-reported outcome measures for evaluating the benefit of speech processor upgrading in patients with cochlear implants.患者报告结局测量值评估人工耳蜗植入患者言语处理器升级获益的价值。
HNO. 2024 Jan;72(Suppl 1):25-32. doi: 10.1007/s00106-023-01342-6. Epub 2023 Sep 1.
2
[Value of patient-reported outcome measures for evaluating the benefit of speech processor upgrading in patients with cochlear implants. German version].[患者报告结局量表在评估人工耳蜗植入患者言语处理器升级益处中的价值。德文版]
HNO. 2023 Sep;71(9):583-591. doi: 10.1007/s00106-023-01341-7. Epub 2023 Aug 4.
3
[Influence of directional microphones on listening effort in middle ear implant users].

本文引用的文献

1
Cochlear implant microphone location affects speech recognition in diffuse noise.人工耳蜗麦克风位置会影响在弥散噪声环境下的语音识别。
J Am Acad Audiol. 2015 Jan;26(1):51-8; quiz 109-10. doi: 10.3766/jaaa.26.1.6.
2
Advanced beamformers for cochlear implant users: acute measurement of speech perception in challenging listening conditions.用于人工耳蜗使用者的高级声束成形器:在具有挑战性的聆听条件下对言语感知能力的急性测量。
PLoS One. 2014 Apr 22;9(4):e95542. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0095542. eCollection 2014.
3
Benefits from upgrade to the CP810 sound processor for Nucleus 24 cochlear implant recipients.
[定向麦克风对中耳植入用户聆听努力的影响]
HNO. 2023 Jun;71(6):375-385. doi: 10.1007/s00106-022-01223-4. Epub 2022 Sep 26.
4
Speech understanding in diffuse steady noise in typically hearing and hard of hearing listeners.在典型听力和听力障碍者的稳定弥散噪声中言语理解。
PLoS One. 2022 Sep 14;17(9):e0274435. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0274435. eCollection 2022.
5
The COVID-19 pandemic and upgrades of CI speech processors for children: part II-hearing outcomes.COVID-19 大流行与儿童 CI 言语处理器升级:第二部分——听力结果。
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2022 Oct;279(10):4815-4823. doi: 10.1007/s00405-022-07324-8. Epub 2022 Mar 14.
6
Speech Intelligibility and Spatial Release From Masking Improvements Using Spatial Noise Reduction Algorithms in Bimodal Cochlear Implant Users.双耳植入式助听设备中空间降噪算法对语音可懂度和掩蔽释放空间的改善。
Trends Hear. 2021 Jan-Dec;25:23312165211005931. doi: 10.1177/23312165211005931.
7
Adult Users of the Oticon Medical Neuro Cochlear Implant System Benefit from Beamforming in the High Frequencies.使用奥迪康医疗神经耳蜗植入系统的成年用户在高频段受益于波束形成技术。
Audiol Res. 2021 Apr 16;11(2):179-191. doi: 10.3390/audiolres11020016.
8
Benefits in noise from sound processor upgrade in thirty-three cochlear implant users for more than 20 years.33 名接受人工耳蜗植入 20 多年的患者因声音处理器升级而受益于噪声减少。
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2021 Mar;278(3):827-831. doi: 10.1007/s00405-020-06144-y. Epub 2020 Jun 25.
9
Effect of Microphone Configuration and Sound Source Location on Speech Recognition for Adult Cochlear Implant Users with Current-Generation Sound Processors.麦克风配置和声源位置对使用新一代电流型处理器的成人人工耳蜗植入者言语识别的影响。
J Am Acad Audiol. 2020 Sep;31(8):578-589. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1709449. Epub 2020 Apr 27.
10
Effect of Microphone Location and Beamforming Technology on Speech Recognition in Pediatric Cochlear Implant Recipients.麦克风位置和波束成形技术对儿童人工耳蜗植入者言语识别的影响。
J Am Acad Audiol. 2020 Jul;31(7):506-512. doi: 10.3766/jaaa.19025. Epub 2020 Sep 2.
升级到 CP810 声音处理器为 Nucleus 24 人工耳蜗植入者带来的益处。
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2014 Jan;271(1):49-57. doi: 10.1007/s00405-013-2381-8. Epub 2013 Feb 14.
4
List equivalency of the AzBio sentence test in noise for listeners with normal-hearing sensitivity or cochlear implants.具有正常听力敏感度的听众或人工耳蜗植入者在噪声环境下的AzBio句子测试列表等效性。
J Am Acad Audiol. 2012 Jul-Aug;23(7):501-9. doi: 10.3766/jaaa.23.7.2.
5
An evidence-based systematic review of directional microphones and digital noise reduction hearing aids in school-age children with hearing loss.一项针对学龄期听力损失儿童使用定向麦克风和数字降噪助听器的循证系统评价。
Am J Audiol. 2012 Dec;21(2):295-312. doi: 10.1044/1059-0889(2012/12-0014). Epub 2012 Aug 2.
6
Combining directional microphone and single-channel noise reduction algorithms: a clinical evaluation in difficult listening conditions with cochlear implant users.结合指向性麦克风和单通道降噪算法:人工耳蜗使用者在困难聆听环境下的临床评估。
Ear Hear. 2012 Jul-Aug;33(4):e13-23. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e31824b9e21.
7
Comparison of three types of French speech-in-noise tests: a multi-center study.三种类型的法国语音噪声测试比较:一项多中心研究。
Int J Audiol. 2012 Mar;51(3):164-73. doi: 10.3109/14992027.2011.633568. Epub 2011 Nov 28.
8
Improvements in speech perception after the upgrade from the TEMPO+ to the OPUS 2 audio processor.从TEMPO+音频处理器升级到OPUS 2音频处理器后语音感知能力的改善。
ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec. 2012;74(1):6-11. doi: 10.1159/000333124. Epub 2011 Nov 16.
9
Evaluation of different signal processing options in unilateral and bilateral cochlear freedom implant recipients using R-Space background noise.使用R-Space背景噪声评估单侧和双侧人工耳蜗植入受者的不同信号处理选项。
J Am Acad Audiol. 2011 Feb;22(2):65-80. doi: 10.3766/jaaa.22.2.2.
10
Speech perception for adult cochlear implant recipients in a realistic background noise: effectiveness of preprocessing strategies and external options for improving speech recognition in noise.成人人工耳蜗植入者在现实背景噪声中的言语感知:预处理策略和改善噪声中言语识别的外部选项的有效性。
J Am Acad Audiol. 2010 Jul-Aug;21(7):441-51; quiz 487-8. doi: 10.3766/jaaa.21.7.3.