Kohn Christine G, Fermann Gregory J, Peacock W Frank, Wells Phil S, Baugh Christopher W, Ashton Veronica, Crivera Concetta, Schein Jeff R, Wildgoose Peter, Coleman Craig I
a University of Saint Joseph School of Pharmacy , Hartford , CT , USA.
b Department of Emergency Medicine , University of Cincinnati , Cincinnati , OH , USA.
Curr Med Res Opin. 2017 Sep;33(9):1697-1703. doi: 10.1080/03007995.2017.1349659. Epub 2017 Jul 17.
In the EINSTEIN-Pulmonary Embolism (PE) trial, subjects randomized to rivaroxaban versus enoxaparin bridging to vitamin K antagonist (VKA) therapy experienced a reduced index hospital length of stay (LOS). We sought to conduct a systematic review of real-world studies comparing LOS, costs and early outcomes among patients treated with rivaroxaban or parenterally bridged VKA in routine practice.
We searched Medline and Scopus from 1 January 2011 to 30 November 2016 to identify observational studies comparing acute PE patients anticoagulated with rivaroxaban or parenterally bridged VKA and reporting data on index hospital LOS, costs and/or early post-PE outcomes. Studies not using appropriate methods for minimizing confounding bias or not published in English were excluded.
Five studies met inclusion criteria. Rivaroxaban use was associated with decreased index hospital LOS (range: 1.36-1.70 days) and treatment costs (range: $1818-$2688) during an index stay compared to parenterally bridged warfarin. No differences in early readmission for recurrent thrombosis were noted between anticoagulation strategies. Readmission for major bleeding was rare in both cohorts. Similar reductions in LOS (range: 0.23-4.3 days) and costs (range: $251-$7094) were observed with rivaroxaban in studies restricted to patients deemed low risk for early complications by clinical gestalt or by a clinical- or claims-based risk stratification tool.
Regardless of patient predicted risk of post-PE complications, real-world studies suggest that rivaroxaban is associated with a reduced hospital LOS and costs versus parenterally bridged warfarin, without increasing readmission.
在“爱因斯坦-肺栓塞(PE)”试验中,随机接受利伐沙班治疗而非依诺肝素桥接维生素K拮抗剂(VKA)治疗的受试者,其住院时间缩短。我们试图对真实世界研究进行系统回顾,比较在常规实践中接受利伐沙班或胃肠外桥接VKA治疗的患者的住院时间、费用和早期结局。
我们检索了2011年1月1日至2016年11月30日期间的Medline和Scopus数据库,以识别比较接受利伐沙班或胃肠外桥接VKA抗凝治疗的急性PE患者,并报告住院时间、费用和/或PE后早期结局数据的观察性研究。未采用适当方法最小化混杂偏倚或未以英文发表的研究被排除。
五项研究符合纳入标准。与胃肠外桥接华法林相比,使用利伐沙班可使住院时间缩短(范围:1.36 - 1.70天),并降低住院期间的治疗费用(范围:1818美元 - 2688美元)。两种抗凝策略在复发性血栓形成的早期再入院方面无差异。两个队列中因大出血而再入院的情况均很少见。在仅限于通过临床判断或基于临床或索赔的风险分层工具被认为早期并发症风险较低的患者的研究中,使用利伐沙班也观察到了类似的住院时间缩短(范围:0.23 - 4.3天)和费用降低(范围:251美元 - 7094美元)。
无论患者PE后并发症的预测风险如何,真实世界研究表明,与胃肠外桥接华法林相比,利伐沙班可缩短住院时间并降低费用,且不会增加再入院率。