Jan Shumaila, Ghoroi Chinmay, Saxena Dharmesh Chandra
Department of Food Engineering and Technology, Sant Longowal Institute of Engineering and Technology, Longowal, Punjab, India.
DryProTech Laboratory, Chemical Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Gandhinagar, Palaj, Gandhinagar, Gujarat, India.
J Sci Food Agric. 2018 Jan;98(2):667-673. doi: 10.1002/jsfa.8512. Epub 2017 Aug 8.
Flours are often unstable in relation to their flow performance, which is evident when a free-flowing material ceases to flow and the processing, handling, and production parameters depend on the inherent powder characteristics and their bulk behaviour. The present study was conducted to compare the flowability of basmati and non-basmati rice flour affecting bulk handling, which could be related to its particle size, shape and surface roughness (measured by atomic force microscopy) as well as bulk and shear properties, depending upon the processing conditions.
Particle size (171.1-171.9 μm) of both samples was not significantly different. However, the flowability of the non-basmati rice flour was significantly affected by its particle shape (circularity 0.487), surface roughness (124.23 nm) and compressibility (25.32%) in comparison to basmati rice flour (circularity 0.653, surface roughness 113.59 nm and compressibility 21.09%), making it more cohesive than basmati rice flour. Also, basic flow energy was significantly higher in non-basmati flour, thus requiring more energy (147.54 mJ) to flow than basmati rice flour (130.15 mJ).
Overall, flowability was analysed by applying three different pressures (3, 6 and 9 kPa), among which non-basmati rice flour was found to be less flowable (flow function coefficient (FFC) 2.33 at 9 kPa) in comparison to basmati (FFC 3.35 at 9 kPa), making bulk handling difficult. This study could be useful in designing processing equipment, hoppers and silos for rice flour handling. © 2017 Society of Chemical Industry.
