Konnert Candace, Speirs Calandra, Mori Camille
a University of Calgary , Calgary , Alberta , Canada.
Clin Gerontol. 2017 Oct-Dec;40(5):352-361. doi: 10.1080/07317115.2017.1338323. Epub 2017 Jun 6.
The purpose of this study was to investigate the daily diary method (DDM) for assessing family-staff conflicts in nursing homes, to provide descriptive information on conflict, and to examine the relationship between conflict and mood among family caregivers.
Participants were nine caregivers that experienced conflict with staff on an ongoing basis. They were contacted daily by telephone for 14 days and were asked (1) whether a conflict had occurred, (2) to describe the severity and type of conflict, and (3) to rate their positive and negative affect.
Compliance was excellent with no attrition, and there were only 2 missing data points over 126 potential observations. Conflicts occurred on 22% of the days, were rated as moderately severe, and were related to poor resident care, lack of information, and staff attitudes. Participants reported significantly lower positive affect (p < .05) and higher negative affect (p < .001) on conflict versus no-conflict days. Exit interviews indicated positive attitudes towards the DDM.
These results support the feasibility of the DDM for providing an in-depth understanding of family-staff conflict and its relationship to caregivers' mood.
The DDM would ideally be used as an outcome measure in studies that assess interventions that target high-conflict family-staff relationships.
本研究旨在探讨采用日常日记法(DDM)评估养老院中家属与工作人员之间的冲突,提供有关冲突的描述性信息,并检验家庭照顾者之间冲突与情绪的关系。
参与者为九名经常与工作人员发生冲突的照顾者。在14天内每天通过电话联系他们,并询问:(1)是否发生冲突;(2)描述冲突的严重程度和类型;(3)对其积极和消极情绪进行评分。
依从性极佳,无人员流失,在126个潜在观察数据中仅有2个缺失数据点。22%的日子里发生了冲突,冲突被评为中度严重,且与居民护理不佳、信息缺乏和工作人员态度有关。与无冲突日相比,参与者在冲突日报告的积极情绪显著较低(p <.05),消极情绪较高(p <.001)。离职访谈表明对日常日记法持积极态度。
这些结果支持日常日记法在深入了解家属与工作人员冲突及其与照顾者情绪关系方面的可行性。
在评估针对高冲突家属与工作人员关系的干预措施的研究中,日常日记法理想情况下应作为一种结果测量方法。