• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

急诊钝性腹部创伤患者对比增强超声的诊断准确性:系统评价和荟萃分析。

Diagnostic accuracy of contrast enhanced ultrasound in patients with blunt abdominal trauma presenting to the emergency department: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

机构信息

Department of emergency medicine, Sir Run-Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, 310016, China.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2017 Jun 30;7(1):4446. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-04779-2.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-017-04779-2
PMID:28667280
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5493732/
Abstract

We aimed to investigate the diagnostic accuracy of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in evaluating blunt abdominal trauma for patients presenting to the emergency department. Electronic search of Scopus and Pubmed was performed from inception to September 2016. Human studies investigating the diagnostic accuracy of CEUS in identifying abdominal solid organ injuries were included. Risk of bias was assessed using the QUADAS tool. A total of 10 studies were included in the study and 9 of them were included for meta-analysis. The log(DOR) values ranged from 3.80 (95% CI: 2.81-4.79) to 8.52 (95% CI: 4.58-12.47) in component studies. The combined log(DOR) was 6.56 (95% CI: 5.66-7.45). The Cochran's Q was 11.265 (p = 0.793 with 16 degrees of freedom), and the Higgins' I was 0%. The CEUS had a sensitivity of 0.981 (95% CI: 0.868-0.950) and a false positive rate of 0.018 (95% CI: 0.010-0.032) for identifying parenchymal injuries, with an AUC of 0.984. CEUS performed at emergency department had good diagnostic accuracy in identifying abdominal solid organ injuries. CEUS can be recommended in monitoring solid organ injuries, especially for patients managed with non-operative strategy.

摘要

我们旨在探讨对比增强超声(CEUS)在评估因腹部钝伤就诊于急诊科的患者中的诊断准确性。电子检索 Scopus 和 Pubmed 数据库,检索时间截至 2016 年 9 月。纳入研究 CEUS 诊断腹部实质脏器损伤的准确性的人类研究。使用 QUADAS 工具评估偏倚风险。共有 10 项研究纳入本研究,其中 9 项进行了荟萃分析。在单项研究中,log(DOR)值范围为 3.80(95%CI:2.81-4.79)至 8.52(95%CI:4.58-12.47)。合并的 log(DOR)值为 6.56(95%CI:5.66-7.45)。Cochran's Q 为 11.265(p=0.793,自由度为 16),Higgins' I 为 0%。CEUS 对实质脏器损伤的敏感性为 0.981(95%CI:0.868-0.950),假阳性率为 0.018(95%CI:0.010-0.032),AUC 为 0.984。CEUS 在急诊科诊断腹部实质脏器损伤具有良好的诊断准确性。CEUS 可用于监测实质脏器损伤,特别是对接受非手术治疗策略的患者。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/18d5/5493732/cba327a9d34e/41598_2017_4779_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/18d5/5493732/51cc8293fa71/41598_2017_4779_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/18d5/5493732/fba4adb78cfd/41598_2017_4779_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/18d5/5493732/7c6c343a54bb/41598_2017_4779_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/18d5/5493732/cba327a9d34e/41598_2017_4779_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/18d5/5493732/51cc8293fa71/41598_2017_4779_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/18d5/5493732/fba4adb78cfd/41598_2017_4779_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/18d5/5493732/7c6c343a54bb/41598_2017_4779_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/18d5/5493732/cba327a9d34e/41598_2017_4779_Fig4_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Diagnostic accuracy of contrast enhanced ultrasound in patients with blunt abdominal trauma presenting to the emergency department: a systematic review and meta-analysis.急诊钝性腹部创伤患者对比增强超声的诊断准确性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Sci Rep. 2017 Jun 30;7(1):4446. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-04779-2.
2
Accuracy of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in the identification and characterization of traumatic solid organ lesions in children: a retrospective comparison with baseline US and CE-MDCT.对比增强超声(CEUS)在儿童创伤性实性器官病变识别与特征描述中的准确性:与基线超声及对比增强多层螺旋CT的回顾性比较
Radiol Med. 2015 Nov;120(11):989-1001. doi: 10.1007/s11547-015-0535-z. Epub 2015 Mar 31.
3
Comparison between MRI and CEUS in the follow-up of patients with blunt abdominal trauma managed conservatively.磁共振成像(MRI)与超声造影(CEUS)在保守治疗的钝性腹部创伤患者随访中的比较。
Radiol Med. 2016 Jan;121(1):27-37. doi: 10.1007/s11547-015-0578-1. Epub 2015 Aug 8.
4
Contrast enhanced ultrasound for the evaluation of blunt pediatric abdominal trauma.超声造影在小儿腹部钝性创伤中的应用价值评估。
J Pediatr Surg. 2018 Mar;53(3):548-552. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2017.03.042. Epub 2017 Mar 20.
5
[Contrast-enhanced sonography for blunt force abdominal trauma].[对比增强超声在钝性腹部创伤中的应用]
Radiologe. 2011 Jun;51(6):475-82. doi: 10.1007/s00117-010-2103-9.
6
Is it time to re-think FAST? A systematic review and meta-analysis of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound (CEUS) and conventional ultrasound for initial assessment of abdominal trauma.是否需要重新考虑 FAST?对比增强超声(CEUS)和常规超声在腹部创伤初始评估中的系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMC Emerg Med. 2023 Jan 27;23(1):8. doi: 10.1186/s12873-023-00771-4.
7
Contrast-enhanced ultrasound in pediatric blunt abdominal trauma: a systematic review.超声造影在小儿钝性腹部创伤中的应用:系统评价。
J Ultrasound. 2022 Sep;25(3):419-427. doi: 10.1007/s40477-021-00623-6. Epub 2022 Jan 18.
8
Contrast-enhanced ultrasound versus MS-CT in blunt abdominal trauma.腹部钝性创伤中超声造影与多层螺旋CT的比较
Clin Hemorheol Microcirc. 2008;39(1-4):155-69.
9
Contrast-enhanced ultrasound for imaging blunt abdominal trauma - indications, description of the technique and imaging review.超声造影在钝性腹部创伤中的应用——适应证、技术描述和影像学评价。
Ultraschall Med. 2012 Feb;33(1):60-7. doi: 10.1055/s-0031-1273442. Epub 2012 Jan 24.
10
The use of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in blunt abdominal trauma: advantages and limitations.超声造影在钝性腹部创伤中的应用:优势与局限性。
Acta Radiol. 2014 Sep;55(7):776-84. doi: 10.1177/0284185113505517. Epub 2013 Sep 23.

引用本文的文献

1
Expanding Role of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound and Elastography in the Evaluation of Abdominal Pathologies in Children.超声造影和弹性成像在儿童腹部病变评估中的作用扩展
Diagnostics (Basel). 2025 Jul 1;15(13):1680. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics15131680.
2
Contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (CEUS) in the management of pediatric renal injuries: where are we now?超声造影(CEUS)在小儿肾损伤管理中的应用:我们目前处于什么阶段?
J Ultrasound. 2025 Mar 22. doi: 10.1007/s40477-025-01011-0.
3
Diagnostic performance of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in traumatic solid organ injuries in children: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

本文引用的文献

1
Pragmatic Trials.实用性试验
N Engl J Med. 2016 Aug 4;375(5):454-63. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra1510059.
2
Contrast-enhanced ultrasound of the spleen.脾脏的超声造影检查
Ultrasound. 2016 Feb;24(1):41-9. doi: 10.1177/1742271X15617214. Epub 2016 Jan 14.
3
A framework for analysis of research risks and benefits to participants in standard of care pragmatic clinical trials.一项针对标准治疗实用临床试验中参与者研究风险与益处的分析框架。
超声造影在儿童创伤性实体器官损伤中的诊断效能:一项系统评价和Meta分析
Pediatr Radiol. 2025 Feb;55(2):226-241. doi: 10.1007/s00247-024-06127-9. Epub 2024 Dec 13.
4
The Diagnosis and Management of Pediatric Blunt Abdominal Trauma-A Comprehensive Review.小儿钝性腹部创伤的诊断与管理——全面综述
Diagnostics (Basel). 2024 Oct 10;14(20):2257. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics14202257.
5
Management of Pediatric Solid Organ Injuries.小儿实体器官损伤的管理
Children (Basel). 2024 May 30;11(6):667. doi: 10.3390/children11060667.
6
Spread and feasibility of non-operative management (NOM) of traumatic splenic injuries in adults: a national survey.成人外伤性脾损伤非手术治疗(NOM)的传播和可行性:一项全国性调查。
Updates Surg. 2024 Jan;76(1):245-253. doi: 10.1007/s13304-023-01718-x. Epub 2023 Dec 16.
7
The value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in vascular injury from blunt abdominal trauma in solid organs: Comparison with multidetector computed tomography using angiography as the reference standard.对比增强超声在实质器官钝性腹部创伤血管损伤中的价值:与多排 CT 血管造影比较,以血管造影为参考标准。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2023 Jul 21;102(29):e34323. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000034323.
8
Is it time to re-think FAST? A systematic review and meta-analysis of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound (CEUS) and conventional ultrasound for initial assessment of abdominal trauma.是否需要重新考虑 FAST?对比增强超声(CEUS)和常规超声在腹部创伤初始评估中的系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMC Emerg Med. 2023 Jan 27;23(1):8. doi: 10.1186/s12873-023-00771-4.
9
The Technique and Advantages of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound in the Diagnosis and Follow-Up of Traumatic Abdomen Solid Organ Injuries.超声造影在创伤性腹部实性脏器损伤诊断及随访中的技术与优势
Diagnostics (Basel). 2022 Feb 8;12(2):435. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics12020435.
10
Contrast-enhanced ultrasound of blunt abdominal trauma in children.儿童钝性腹部创伤的超声造影检查。
Pediatr Radiol. 2021 Nov;51(12):2253-2269. doi: 10.1007/s00247-020-04869-w. Epub 2021 May 12.
Clin Trials. 2016 Dec;13(6):605-611. doi: 10.1177/1740774516656945. Epub 2016 Jun 30.
4
International guidelines for contrast-enhanced ultrasonography: ultrasound imaging in the new millennium.国际对比增强超声造影指南:新世纪的超声成像
Ultrasonography. 2016 Apr;35(2):89-103. doi: 10.14366/usg.15057. Epub 2015 Dec 23.
5
The need for pragmatic clinical trials in low and middle income settings - taking essential neonatal interventions delivered as part of inpatient care as an illustrative example.在低收入和中等收入环境中开展务实临床试验的必要性——以作为住院护理一部分提供的基本新生儿干预措施为例进行说明。
BMC Med. 2016 Jan 18;14:5. doi: 10.1186/s12916-016-0556-z.
6
Data management by using R: big data clinical research series.使用 R 进行数据管理:大数据临床研究系列。
Ann Transl Med. 2015 Nov;3(20):303. doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2305-5839.2015.11.26.
7
Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in blunt abdominal trauma.腹部钝性创伤中的超声造影(CEUS)
Br J Radiol. 2016;89(1061):20150823. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20150823. Epub 2016 Jan 8.
8
Blunt splenic trauma: Assessment, management and outcomes.钝性脾损伤:评估、处理及预后
Surgeon. 2016 Feb;14(1):52-8. doi: 10.1016/j.surge.2015.08.001. Epub 2015 Aug 30.
9
Comparison between MRI and CEUS in the follow-up of patients with blunt abdominal trauma managed conservatively.磁共振成像(MRI)与超声造影(CEUS)在保守治疗的钝性腹部创伤患者随访中的比较。
Radiol Med. 2016 Jan;121(1):27-37. doi: 10.1007/s11547-015-0578-1. Epub 2015 Aug 8.
10
Accuracy of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in the identification and characterization of traumatic solid organ lesions in children: a retrospective comparison with baseline US and CE-MDCT.对比增强超声(CEUS)在儿童创伤性实性器官病变识别与特征描述中的准确性:与基线超声及对比增强多层螺旋CT的回顾性比较
Radiol Med. 2015 Nov;120(11):989-1001. doi: 10.1007/s11547-015-0535-z. Epub 2015 Mar 31.